Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective, longitudinal, single-arm interventional study of lung cancer screening.
Main hypothesis: The tomographic screening for lung cancer in a population with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease could leads to an increase in the proportion of false-positive cases resulting in unnecessary medical procedures, which represents a waste of resources and a risk for patients.
Main objective: To assess whether the percentage of false-positive cases with indication of biopsy after lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in high-risk smokers in a population with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease will be within the expected range according to other studies in the literature.
As there is robust evidence of the effectiveness of screening in reducing mortality from lung cancer, we expect the project to bring benefits to patients treated for image-detected lung cancer in the project, with reduced staging and a shorter time between diagnosis and treatment. Therefore , although the focus is on the safety of screening, the project will also monitor the cancer detection rate, which is a surrogate endpoint of effectiveness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| • Proportion of negative cases on screening according to the Lung-RADS classification. | Tomographic screening for lung cancer in a population with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease may increase the proportion of false-positive cases, leading to unnecessary medical procedures, resource waste, and patient risk. This epidemiological scenario may also result in an increase in cases classified as benign or probably benign in screening. | Last 10 years |
| • Proportion of false-positives. | Tomographic screening for lung cancer in a population with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease may increase the proportion of false-positive cases, leading to unnecessary medical procedures, resource waste, and patient risk. This epidemiological scenario may also result in an increase in cases classified as benign or probably benign in screening. | Last 10 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| • Cancer detection rate. | Not Applicable (N/A). The findings of each outcome will be compared with results published in the scientific literature. | last 10 years |
| • Willingness to be screened (ie, proportion of eligible patients actually signing up for the study) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
In order, to be eligible for the study, patients must fulfill all the following inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
In order, to be exclude for the study, patients must at least one of the following exclusion criteria:
Contraindications to the screening examination: (claustrophobic or weighing more than 130 kgs).
Inability to climb 3 stair steps non-stop (36 steps).
Disabling dyspnea
Symptomatic (with signs and symptoms suspicious of breast cancer lung, namely):
Not provided
Not provided
The population of this study will be adult patients, both sexes, a high-risk smoker selected from a population with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease. The smokers at high risk for developing lung cancer, in a population with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease made up of SUS users registered in the Smoking Cessation Program in the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center | Contact | 1-877-240-9479 | information.center@astrazeneca.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Arn Migowski Rocha dos Santos | Instituto Nacional de Câncer | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Rio de Janeiro | 20230-130 | Brazil |
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal Vivli.org. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Not provided
AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA/PhRMA Data-Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please refer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the anonymized individual patient-level data via secure research environment Vivli.org. A Signed Data Usage Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information.
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not Applicable (N/A). The findings of each outcome will be compared with results published in the scientific literature. |
| Last 10 years |
| • Percentage of adherence to screening - calculated by dividing the number of individuals screened with LDCT (numerator) by the number of eligible individuals invited to screen (denominator). | Not Applicable (N/A). The findings of each outcome will be compared with results published in the scientific literature. | Last 10 years |
| • Percentage of adherence to follow-up. | Not Applicable (N/A). The findings of each outcome will be compared with results published in the scientific literature. | Last 10 years |
| • Prevalence of granulomatous disease in screening positive cases | Not Applicable (N/A). The findings of each outcome will be compared with results published in the scientific literature. | Last 10 years |
| • Prevalence of incidental findings. | Not Applicable (N/A). The findings of each outcome will be compared with results published in the scientific literature. | Last 10 years |
| • Prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings that required follow-up. | Not Applicable (N/A). The findings of each outcome will be compared with results published in the scientific literature. | Last 10 years |
| D008171 |
| Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |