Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study examined the effects of a tactical training program based on critical thinking (TPCT) on the tactical efficiency and decision-making performance of university futsal players. The intervention was designed to strengthen players' ability to interpret the dynamics of play, anticipate opponents' actions, and generate adaptive tactical responses under competitive conditions.
The program followed a socio-constructivist framework, promoting learning through problem solving and interaction among teammates. Training sessions combined representative game situations, reflective questioning, and guided tactical discussions.
A single-group pre-post design was implemented. Thirteen university players participated voluntarily after providing informed consent and receiving approval from the institutional ethics committee. Data were collected before and after the intervention to assess individual and collective tactical performance, goal effectiveness, and time of ball possession.
The study aimed to provide evidence on the educational and performance impact of a critical thinking-based tactical approach in futsal, contributing to contemporary models of athlete development and pedagogical innovation in team sports.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPCT | Experimental | This arm includes a single cohort of university futsal players who receive a critical thinking-based tactical training program (TPCT). The intervention is delivered during regular team training over multiple weeks through structured sessions that combine dynamic warm-up, representative small-sided games, and futsal-specific tactical scenarios. Each session uses guided discovery and reflective questioning to promote tactical awareness, anticipation, and collective decision-making. Task constraints, game formats, and intensity are progressively adjusted to increase tactical complexity and physiological load during the main training blocks. All enrolled participants receive the same intervention, and each player serves as his own control through pre- and post-intervention assessments. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tactical Program Critical Thinking | Other | The intervention is a futsal-specific tactical training program structured around critical thinking (TPCT). Across multiple weeks, players complete representative small-sided and conditioned games framed by brief tactical problems (for example, creating numerical superiority or protecting central lanes). During tasks, the coach uses guided discovery and structured questioning to promote reading of key cues, generation and comparison of options, justification of decisions using principles of play, and anticipation of opponents' and teammates' actions. Task constraints and intensity are progressively adjusted, and each session ends with a brief collective reflection. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in execution time during futsal-specific tactical test | Time (seconds) required for each player to complete a standardized futsal-specific tactical test involving ball control, passing, movement, and finishing actions in a predefined sequence. The test is administered individually under stable conditions. The primary endpoint is the change in execution time from pre- to post-intervention; lower times indicate better tactical-motor efficiency and faster resolution of the game situation. | Time Frame: Baseline (up to 7 days before the first TPCT session) and post-intervention (up to 7 days after the final TPCT session), up to 7 weeks in total |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in number of goals scored during futsal-specific tactical test | Number of goals scored by each player during a standardized futsal-specific tactical test, performed under the same conditions at baseline and post-intervention. The test requires completing a predefined sequence of actions (ball control, passing and finishing) with a fixed number of shooting opportunities. The secondary endpoint is the change in goals scored from pre- to post-intervention; higher values indicate better offensive effectiveness during the test. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participation is not restricted based on self-identified gender. Eligibility is defined by biological sex and membership in the university futsal team according to the study inclusion criteria, without additional limitations based on gender identity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universidad de San Buenaventura - Medellín | Medellín | Antioquia | 054080 | Colombia |
The plan for sharing individual participant data (IPD) has not been finalized. The study involves a small, identifiable sample of university athletes from a single team, which increases the risk of re-identification even after de-identification procedures. Before any IPD can be shared, the research team must review the informed consent documentation, institutional policies, and ethics committee recommendations to determine whether controlled access to an anonymized dataset is appropriate. If IPD sharing is implemented in the future, conditions for access, type of data shared, and repository details will be specified in an updated record and in subsequent publications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Single-group, pre-post interventional model. A single cohort of university futsal players receives the critical thinking-based tactical training program, with all participants exposed to the same sequence of training sessions. Tactical and performance outcomes are assessed before and after the intervention, and each participant serves as his own control. No randomization or parallel comparison group is used.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Time Frame: Baseline (up to 7 days before the first TPCT session) and post-intervention (up to 7 days after the final TPCT session), up to 7 weeks in total |
| Change in the quality of collective tactical discourse during TPCT sessions | Change in the quality of collective tactical discourse during TPCT sessions, analysed from two audio-recorded group discussions (early and late intervention). Transcripts are segmented into turns of talk or thematic fragments and coded with a 10-indicator analytic rubric (0-3 scale) derived from the TPCT (e.g., clarity of objective, contextual specificity, anticipation, counter-argumentation, integration of perspectives, metacognition). Session-level scores and deltas (late-early) are computed, and emergent themes (for example time management, responsibility, commitment) are described to complement quantitative performance outcomes. | Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 7 of the TPCT programme (early and late intervention sessions; approximately 6-7 weeks) |