Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| D43TW009759 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| HS5348ES | Other Identifier | Uganda National Council for Science and Technology | |
| Mak-SOMREC-2023-775 | Other Identifier | Makerere University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee | |
| RG1125359 | Other Identifier | Fred Hutch Cancer Center Institutional Review Board |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Varian Medical Systems | INDUSTRY |
| Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This phase II trial compares the effect of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) when given in combination with cisplatin and brachytherapy in patients with stage IB3, II, or III cervical cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. CFRT delivers the total dose of radiation over the amount of time according to standard practice. HFRT delivers higher doses of radiation therapy over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects. HFRT shortens treatment duration and may reduce costs and may improve the completion rates. Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Brachytherapy, also known as internal radiation therapy, uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. HFRT may be safe, tolerable, and/or as effective as CFRT when given in combination with cisplatin and brachytherapy in treating patients with stage IB3, II or III cervical cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine the safety, and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 16 fractions) compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) in women with locally advanced cervical cancer in Uganda.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the incidence of grade 3+ gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity at 1- and 2-years post-treatment with hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 16 fractions) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) in women with cervical cancer in Uganda.
II. To evaluate and compare local control and cervical cancer-specific survival rates at 1 and 2 year after hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 16 fractions) versus conventional radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions).
III. To determine the association between stage-adjusted mean squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) at 1-month post-treatment with the progression-free survival at 1- and 2- years post-treatment with hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 16 fractions) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions).
IV. To compare the costs of healthcare to patients with cervical cancer treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 16 fractions) versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions).
V. To evaluate patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 16 fractions) versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I (INTERVENTION): Patients undergo HFRT once daily (QD), Monday-Friday, for 5 fractions weekly for 16 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Starting on day 1 of radiation therapy, patients receive cisplatin infusion over 1 hour once weekly (QW) during radiation therapy. Starting by week 4, patients may also undergo high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy twice weekly for a total of 4 doses. Patients ineligible for brachytherapy undergo a sequential external beam boost. Additionally, patients undergo computed tomography (CT) and blood sample collection throughout the study.
ARM II (CONTROL): Patients undergo CFRT QD, Monday-Friday, for 5 fractions weekly for up to 25 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Starting on day 1 of radiation therapy, patients receive cisplatin infusion over 1 hour QW during radiation therapy. Starting by week 4, patients may also undergo HDR brachytherapy twice weekly for a total of 4 doses. Patients ineligible for brachytherapy undergo a sequential external beam boost. Additionally, patients undergo CT and blood sample collection throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30, 90, 180, 360, 540, and 720 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (HFRT) | Experimental | Patients undergo HFRT QD, Monday-Friday, for 5 fractions weekly for 16 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Starting on day 1 of radiation therapy, patients receive cisplatin infusion over 1 hour QW during radiation therapy. Starting by week 4, patients may also undergo HDR brachytherapy twice weekly for a total of 4 doses. Patients ineligible for brachytherapy undergo a sequential external beam boost. Additionally, patients undergo CT and blood sample collection throughout the study. |
|
| Arm II (CFRT) | Active Comparator | Patients undergo CFRT QD, Monday-Friday, for 5 fractions weekly for up to 25 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Starting on day 1 of radiation therapy, patients receive cisplatin infusion over 1 hour QW during radiation therapy. Starting by week 4, patients may also undergo HDR brachytherapy twice weekly for a total of 4 doses. Patients ineligible for brachytherapy undergo a sequential external beam boost. Additionally, patients undergo CT and blood sample collection throughout the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy | Radiation | Undergoing HFRT - The prescription dose will be 40 Gy in 16 fractions (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the entire pelvis, with concurrent integrated nodal boost at 3.0 Gy per fraction (48 Gy) to involved (positive) pelvic nodes, delivered once a day, Monday through Friday, 5 fractions per week, using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of adverse events (AEs) | It will be categorized into 5 grades. The Conchran-Mantel-Haenszel test will be used to compare differences in the grades of AEs between patients who will receive hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy by stratifying for HIV status. A p-value of < 5% will be regarded as significant. | Up to 90 days post-treatment |
| Incidence of grade 3 or greater radiotherapy-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary AEs | Will compare the proportion of patients between the hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventional fractionated radiotherapy using a risk difference approach, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in proportion will be estimated using the Farrington-Manning test. Non-inferiority will be determined when the upper bound of a two-sided 95% CI is less than 10%. | At 1 and 2 years post-treatment |
| Local control (complete remission, stable disease, and partial response) rate | Will be compared using means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Differences in local control for each treatment group and the 95% CI will be calculated using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Data on tumor sizes that are normally distributed will be presented as means and standard deviations with 95% CI. The log-rank test will be used to compare the local control rates. The mean difference between groups will be calculated using an independent T-test for normally distributed data. Will compare the proportion between arms using a risk difference approach and the 95% CI, the difference in proportion will be estimated using the Farrington-Manning test. Non-inferiority will be determined when the upper bound of a two-sided 95% Confidence interval is less than 10%. | At 1 and 2 years post-treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical cancer-specific survival | Will be estimated for both groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Non-inferiority will be declared when the upper bound of the two-sided 95% CI hazard ratio is less than 1.1. Multivariable Regression analysis will be used to estimate the association between the treatment arm and local control while adjusting for potential confounders such as age, stage, and hemoglobin level. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) | It will be assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A "positive biochemical response" is defined as a decrease in SCC-Ag levels after treatment, whereas a "negative biochemical response" is defined as an increase in SCC-Ag levels after treatment based on an increase in SCC-Ag values exceeding 1 ng/mL. Will be presented as means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges. Differences in SCC-Ag levels at the end of treatment between groups and the 95% CI will be calculated. A multivariable linear regression model will be used to adjust SCC-Ag levels for the cancer stage. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solomon Kibudde, MBChB, MMed. | Contact | +256773004608 | solomon.kibudde@uci.or.ug |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Solomon Kibudde, MBChB, MMed. | Uganda Cancer Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uganda Cancer Institute | Recruiting | Kampala | Kampala | 256 | Uganda |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label phase II randomized non-inferiority trial with a parallel group design. One hundred and twenty participants will be randomized 1:1 into two arms - conventional fractionated radiotherapy or hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Not provided
Not provided
This study does not provide for blinding of participants or providers due to the significant differences between the study intervention and control in terms of the duration of treatment, three weeks compared to five weeks of external beam radiotherapy. However, information bias will be minimized by ensuring that data collectors (research staff) are not directly involved in the delivery of treatment for study patients
Not provided
|
|
| Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy | Radiation | Undergoing CFRT |
|
|
| Cisplatin | Drug | Undergoing Cisplatin |
|
|
| High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy | Radiation | Undergoing HDR Brachytherapy |
|
|
| External Beam Radiotherapy Boost | Radiation | Undergoing external beam radiotherapy boost |
|
|
| Computed Tomography | Procedure | Undergoing CT scan |
|
|
| Biospecimen Collection | Procedure | Undergoing blood sample collection |
|
|
| Questionnaire and Physical Exam | Other | Ancillary Studies |
|
|
| At 1 and 2 years post-treatment |
| Progression-free survival (PFS) | Will be computed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves, describing the median PFS and its 95% CI. | From randomization to the date of first recurrence or progression of disease or death, assessed up to 2 years |
| At baseline, at 4 weeks post-treatment |
| Association of SCC-Ag levels and PFS | The Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients will be used to estimate the association between stage-adjusted SCC-Ag levels and PFS. Cox proportional hazards regression models will be used to determine the correlation between stage-adjusted SCC-Ag levels and PFS. | Up to 1 and 2 years post-treatment |
| Health-related quality of life (costs of healthcare) | The total cost per patient, the differences between the costs in the two arms, and the 95% CI will be calculated. The volume of resources and costs will mainly be reported as mean values with standard deviations and mean differences with 95% CI using an independent student t-test. All analysis will be conducted using Stata version 16.0. | Up to 2 years post-treatment |
| Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life | Will be calculated, and reported in mean scores, with standard deviation and/or 95% CI. The mean score will be compared between arms with Welch's t-test. | Up to 2 years post-treatment |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002583 | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014594 | Uterine Neoplasms |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D002577 | Uterine Cervical Diseases |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069473 | Radiation Dose Hypofractionation |
| D002945 | Cisplatin |
| D010984 | Platinum |
| D001918 | Brachytherapy |
| D001800 | Blood Specimen Collection |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| D012149 | Restraint, Physical |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019583 | Dose Fractionation, Radiation |
| D011879 | Radiotherapy Dosage |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017672 | Nitrogen Compounds |
| D017671 | Platinum Compounds |
| D019216 | Metals, Heavy |
| D004602 | Elements |
| D028561 | Transition Elements |
| D008670 | Metals |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D011677 | Punctures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |
| D032763 | Behavior Control |
| D007103 | Immobilization |
Not provided
Not provided