Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being done to understand how well a medical device called OSMONAR Nasal Gel works and how safe it is for people who suffer from a dry nose.
A dry nose can cause discomfort, crusting, irritation, and breathing difficulties. There are not many effective treatments available. This study may help doctors find a new and safe option for people with this condition.
About 60 adults with symptoms of dry nose will take part.
Each participant will use the assigned product for 14 days applying it twice a day as follows:
Each participant will have three visits:
At each visit, the study doctor will:
The study will look at:
This study was planned, organized, and performed autonomously as a non-profit study without any external support by the principal investigator of the Otorhinolaryngology Department at Giovanni Paolo II Hospital in Lamezia Terme.
The results of the study will help doctors learn whether OSMONAR Nasal Gel can be a safe and effective treatment for people with dry nose and whether it works better than saline solution:
Nasal dryness is a frequent condition caused by mucosal atrophy, chronic irritation, infections, environmental factors, or systemic diseases such as Sjögren's syndrome. Symptoms may include crusting, nasal obstruction, irritation, and breathing discomfort. Management typically involves eliminating triggering factors, maintaining hydration, humidifying the environment, and using topical agents such as saline solutions, oils, or hyaluronic-acid-based products.
This study evaluates the performance and safety of OSMONAR Nasal Gel, a medical device containing pyrohyaluronate (PCA) and hyaluronic acid (HA). The product is designed to hydrate the nasal mucosa, form a protective film against external irritants, and support mucosal repair. The aim is to determine whether OSMONAR can improve symptoms associated with dry nose more effectively than saline solution.
A total of 60 adults with dry nose syndrome will be randomized into two groups:
The study is randomized and single-blind and includes three visits: baseline (Day 0), interim (Day 7), and final evaluation (Day 14). At each visit, participants will rate nasal dryness using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, nasal crusting, obstruction, and respiratory discomfort will be assessed by Investigator using fiber-optic rhinoscopy. Safety will be evaluated by monitoring adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSMONAR Nasal Gel | Experimental | Medical Device Class IIa |
|
| Isotonic saline solution | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmonar | Device | one application per nostril twice daily (in the morning and in the evening) administered for 14 consecutive days |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective nasal dryness | The change in subjective nasal dryness, as evaluated by the patient using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score ranging from 0 (no nasal dryness) to 10 (maximum level of nasal dryness), will be assessed from baseline to final visit (day 14). The mean values will be compared between the two treatment groups | 14 days |
| Incidence of adverse events | The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and serious adverse device effects (SADEs) will be collected by Investigators, compared between the two groups, and analyzed with the incidence in standard population | 14 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of nasal crusts | Percentage of subjects with nasal crusts evaluated by fiber-optic rhinoscopy at baseline and at Final Visit (day 14). The decrease in % will be compared between the two treatment groups | 14 days |
| Presence of nasal obstruction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the components of the OSMONAR or of saline solution; 4. Lesions/infections in the nasal area;
5. Use of preparations that may influence the study outcome within the last 2 weeks prior to baseline and during the study (e.g. antibiotics, corticosteroids etc.);
6. History or presence of any other clinically significant known (self-reported) condition /disorder, which per investigator's judgement could interfere with the results of the study or the safety of the subject;
7. Pregnancy, nursing or within first 3 months post-partum;
8. History of or current abuse of drugs, alcohol or medication;
9. Participation in another study during the last 30 days prior to baseline.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michele Grasso, Dr. | Presidio Ospedaliero di Lamezia Terme Giovanni Paolo II | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Otolaryngology - Presidio Ospedaliero di Lamezia Terme Giovanni Paolo II | Lamezia Terme | CZ | 88046 | Italy |
The individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication
IPD will be available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request after the result publication.
Other researchers will receive the IPD upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Not provided
Not provided
randomized single-blind design
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Other | one application per nostril twice daily (in the morning and in the evening) administered for 14 consecutive days |
|
Percentage of subjects with nasal obstruction evaluated by fiber-optic rhinoscopy at baseline and at Final Visit (day 14). The decrease in % will be compared between the two treatment groups |
| 14 days |
| Presence of respiratory discomfort | Percentage of subjects with respiratory discomfort evaluated by fiber-optic rhinoscopy at baseline and at Final Visit (day 14). The decrease in % will be compared between the two treatment groups | 14 days |