Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to explore the information provided to mothers about labor induction and its connection to their childbirth experience. In addition, the study examines how the use of social media may influence the birth experience among patients undergoing labor induction.
Subject undergoing planned induction of labor will be recruited. At recruitment the participants will be asked to answer a questionnaire. Follow-up questionnaires will be sent to the participants one week and three months after the induction.
The first questionnaire assesses how well the participants were informed about the induction. The following questionnaires will assess the childbirth experience and induction experience.
The main aim of the study is to investigate whether being being well informed about the induction of labor is related to better experience of childbirth. Moreover, the correlation between reported social media use and childbirth experience will be evaluated.
After obtaining full data from the first 50 subjects an interim analysis will be performed, to decide the final target sample size.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject undergoing planned induction of labor |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Childbirth experience | Childbirth experience assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 is the worst possible and 10 the best possible childbirth experience. | Three months after induction of labor |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Childbirth experience | Childbirth experience assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 is the worst possible and 10 the best possible childbirth experience. | One week after induction of labor |
| Experience of labor induction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pregnant subjects undergoing planned induction for various reasons.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Huhtala, M.D., Ph.D. | Contact | +35823130000 | misahu@utu.fi |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mikael Huhtala, M.D., Ph.D. | Turku University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turku University Hospital | Recruiting | Turku | Finland |
To ensure study subject anonymity the study data will not be published.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 is the worst possible and 10 the best possible labor induction experience.
| One week after induction of labor |
| Experience of labor induction | Assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 is the worst possible and 10 the best possible labor induction experience. | Three months after induction of labor |
| Did childbirth experience meet participant's expectations | Four points Likert scale with the following possible answers: 1) very poorly, 2) quite poorly, 3) quite well, 4) very well. | One week after induction of labor |