Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized clinical trial aims to compare two different methods of caries removal in primary molars: the chemomechanical technique using Cariclast gel and the conventional rotary drilling method. The study will evaluate and compare the pain perception, patient acceptance, and operative time associated with both techniques in children aged 5-7years.
Dental caries is one of the most common chronic diseases in children, and the management of carious lesions in primary teeth should be both effective and minimally invasive. Traditional caries removal using rotary instruments is associated with discomfort and anxiety among pediatric patients.
Chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents such as Cariclast have been developed as a more conservative and less traumatic alternative. Cariclast works by softening the infected dentin chemically, allowing its gentle removal without pain or vibration.
This randomized controlled clinical trial will compare Cariclast with the conventional rotary drilling method regarding:
Pain perception assessed using the FLACC scale.
Patient acceptance evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Operative time required to complete the caries removal procedure.
All procedures will be performed on cooperative children with occlusal caries in primary molars, without pulpal involvement, attending the Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| cariclast group | Experimental | Participants in this arm will undergo chemomechanical caries removal using Cariclast gel (sodium hypochlorite-based CMCR agent). The gel will be applied on the carious lesion according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by gentle removal of the softened dentin using hand excavators. |
|
| Conventional Mechanical Caries Removal | Active Comparator | Participants in this arm will undergo conventional mechanical caries removal using a high-speed rotary handpiece under adequate water cooling. The procedure will follow standard clinical principles for removing infected dentin while maintaining a conservative approach to preserve sound tooth structure in primary molars. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cares removal using cariclast gel | Procedure | Chemomechanical caries removal using Cariclast gel applied to soften infected dentin, followed by gentle excavation with hand instruments. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Perception During Caries Removal | Pain perception will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Before starting caries removal, the child will be briefly shown the six facial expressions and given age-appropriate instructions to ensure proper understanding of how to express discomfort. During the procedure, immediately at the moment of peak stimulation, the child will be asked to point to the face that best reflects their pain experience. The selected score (ranging from 0 to 10) will be recorded as an objective standardized measure of procedural pain. | During the caries removal procedure (immediate intraoperative assessment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Child Acceptance of the Caries Removal Technique | Patient acceptance will be measured immediately after completion of the caries removal procedure using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale consists of a 100-mm horizontal line with descriptors at each end indicating the extremes of comfort, ranging from "no discomfort" to "worst possible discomfort." Each child will be asked to mark a point on the line that best represents their overall comfort during the procedure. The distance in millimeters from the "no discomfort" anchor to the child's mark will be measured to quantify the level of acceptance. Higher scores indicate lower acceptance of the technique. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Children:
Tooth:
Exclusion Criteria:
Children:
Teeth:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| noran mohamed kamel, bechelor | Contact | 011464949811 | mnourr211@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| randa youssef abdelgawad, professor | Cairo University | Study Director |
| rana sobhy saeed | Cairo University | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38755991 | Result | Gupta N, Marwah N, Nigam A, Vishwanathaiah S, Alessa N, Almeslet A, Alhakami K, Dawood T, Masha FM, Maganur PC. Evaluation of Papacarie(R), Carie-Care, BRIX3000 and conventional hand instrumentation for caries removal in primary teeth: a randomized control study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;48(3):131-138. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.066. Epub 2024 May 3. | |
| Result | Nagaveni, N. B., Radhika, N. B., Satisha, T. S., Ashwini, K. S., Sridhar, N., & Gupta, S. (2016). Efficacy of new chemomechanical caries removal agent compared with conventional method in primary teeth: An in vivo study. International Journal of Oral Health Sciences, 6(2), 52-58. doi: 10.4103/2231-6027.199986 | ||
| 33114249 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Conventional Mechanical Caries Removal | Procedure | Conventional mechanical caries removal performed using a high-speed rotary handpiece under adequate water cooling, following standard clinical principles for primary molars. |
|
| Immediately after the procedure |
| Result |
| Cardoso M, Coelho A, Lima R, Amaro I, Paula A, Marto CM, Sousa J, Spagnuolo G, Marques Ferreira M, Carrilho E. Efficacy and Patient's Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal-a Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 23;9(11):3407. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113407. |
| 23960549 | Result | Al Agili DE. A systematic review of population-based dental caries studies among children in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2013 Jan;25(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 10. |
| 12673435 | Result | Chaussain-Miller C, Decup F, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Gillet D, Guigand M, Kaleka R, Laboux O, Lafont J, Medioni E, Serfaty R, Toumelin-Chemla F, Tubiana J, Lasfargues JJ. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system. Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Mar;7(1):32-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0196-5. Epub 2003 Feb 20. |
| 20297701 | Result | Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Winter;34(2):117-23. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.34.2.f312p36g18463716. |