Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1427/ĐHYD-HĐĐĐ | Other Identifier | University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Gingival enlargement is a common complication in orthodontic patients, often resulting from plaque accumulation and chronic inflammatory response during fixed appliance therapy. Surgical gingivectomy is frequently required to restore gingival contour, improve esthetics, and facilitate oral hygiene. Traditionally, gingivectomy is performed using a scalpel, but laser-assisted techniques have recently gained popularity due to their potential benefits, including reduced bleeding, postoperative discomfort, and faster healing.
This randomized split-mouth clinical trial aims to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes of gingivectomy performed with a diode laser versus conventional scalpel surgery in orthodontic patients presenting with gingival enlargement. Clinical parameters, microbial profiles, and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and at multiple postoperative intervals to assess the effectiveness and advantages of each technique.
Gingival enlargement is a frequent periodontal manifestation in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, primarily resulting from increased plaque retention and subsequent chronic inflammation. This condition can compromise esthetics, interfere with effective oral hygiene, and lead to periodontal complications if left untreated. Gingivectomy is the treatment of choice for removing excess gingival tissue and reestablishing physiological gingival contours. Conventional scalpel gingivectomy has been widely used; however, the advent of laser technology, particularly diode lasers, has provided an alternative surgical approach with potential clinical advantages, including better hemostasis, reduced intraoperative discomfort, faster wound healing, and less postoperative pain.
This study is designed as a randomized split-mouth clinical trial to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes of gingivectomy performed using a scalpel versus a diode laser in orthodontic patients with gingival enlargement. Eligible participants will be recruited from the Orthodontics Department of the Ho Chi Minh City National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology. Each patient will undergo gingivectomy on two contralateral quadrants: one quadrant treated with conventional scalpel surgery (control side) and the other with diode laser surgery (test side). The allocation of quadrants will be randomized.
Clinical parameters including Plaque Index (PlI), Gingival Index (GI), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), Gingival Margin Position (GMP), and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) will be recorded at baseline and at multiple postoperative intervals. Subgingival plaque samples will be collected for microbiological analysis using real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to evaluate the presence and levels of periodontopathogenic bacteria. Patient-reported outcomes such as postoperative pain will also be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS).
All surgical procedures will be performed by the same calibrated operator to minimize variability. Standardized oral hygiene instructions will be provided to all participants throughout the study period. The collected data will be analyzed to determine differences in clinical healing, microbial changes, and patient comfort between the two treatment modalities. The findings are expected to provide evidence-based insights into the advantages and limitations of diode laser gingivectomy compared with the traditional scalpel technique in orthodontic patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scalpel Gingivectomy | Experimental | Conventional gingivectomy performed using a surgical scalpel. Gingival overgrowth was excised using standard surgical technique under local anesthesia. |
|
| Diode Laser Gingivectomy | Experimental | Gingivectomy performed using a diode laser. Laser parameters were set according to manufacturer's recommendations. No sutures required. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scalpel Gingivectomy | Procedure | Conventional gingivectomy performed using a surgical scalpel. Gingival overgrowth was excised using standard surgical technique under local anesthesia. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gingival margin position | Reduction in Gingival Overgrowth Index | 1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) Reduction | Changes in probing pocket depth at baseline and follow-up to assess periodontal healing response. | 1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy |
| Reduction in Gingival Index (GI) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen | University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City - Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology | Ho Chi Minh City | Ho Chi Minh | 700000 | Vietnam |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Newman and Carranza's Clinical Periodontology and Implantology. 14th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier / Saunders; 2023. | ||
| 14158464 | Result | SILNESS J, LOE H. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968. No abstract available. | |
| Result | Krishnan V, Ambili R, Davidovitch Z, Murphy NC. Gingiva and Orthodontic Treatment. Semin Orthod. 2007;13(4):257-271. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2007.08.007. | ||
| 17975951 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City | View source |
Not provided
The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study is conducted as part of a postgraduate thesis with a limited scope and without a formal data sharing agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005885 | Gingival Hyperplasia |
| D019214 | Gingival Overgrowth |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, split-mouth clinical trial using a crossover design. Each participant received both interventions (scalpel gingivectomy and diode laser gingivectomy) at different sites within the same arch.
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the nature of the interventions, masking of participants and operators was not feasible. Outcome assessors were blinded to the type of intervention performed at each site.
| Diode laser Gingivectomy | Procedure | Gingivectomy performed using a diode laser. Laser parameters were set according to manufacturer's recommendations. No sutures required. |
|
Changes in gingival inflammation as assessed by the Löe and Silness Gingival Index at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
| 1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy |
| Reduction in Plaque Index (PlI) | Changes in plaque accumulation as measured by the Silness and Löe Plaque Index at baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment. | 1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy |
| Reduction in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) | Changes in bleeding on probing percentage recorded at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after treatment to evaluate periodontal health response. | 1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy |
| Microbiological changes in subgingival plaque | hanges in subgingival bacterial composition (e.g., total bacterial load, presence of periodontal pathogens) between baseline, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. | 1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy |
| Postoperative pain score | Patient-reported pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to compare postoperative discomfort between treatment groups. | 1 day, 3 days and 7 days after gingivectomy |
| Post-surgical bleeding | Assessment of postoperative bleeding severity and duration based on clinical observation and patient reports, to compare healing response between scalpel and diode laser techniques. | 1 day, 3 days and 7 days post-surgery |
| Result |
| Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Bertrand MF, Merigo E, Nammour S, Vescovi P. Nd:YAG and diode laser in the surgical management of soft tissues related to orthodontic treatment. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Oct;25(5):381-92. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.2068. |
| 37738371 | Result | Maboudi A, Fekrazad R, Shiva A, Salehabadi N, Moosazadeh M, Ehsani H, Yazdani O. Gingivectomy with Diode Laser Versus the Conventional Scalpel Surgery and Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy in Treatment of Orthodontic Treatment-Induced Gingival Enlargement: A Systematic Review. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 Sep;41(9):449-459. doi: 10.1089/photob.2023.0060. |
| 31111882 | Result | Lione R, Pavoni C, Noviello A, Clementini M, Danesi C, Cozza P. Conventional versus laser gingivectomy in the management of gingival enlargement during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jan 27;42(1):78-85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz032. |
| 23186371 | Result | Zanatta FB, Ardenghi TM, Antoniazzi RP, Pinto TM, Rosing CK. Association between gingival bleeding and gingival enlargement and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of subjects under fixed orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2012 Nov 27;12:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-53. |
| 21724088 | Result | Gong Y, Lu J, Ding X. Clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic factors of orthodontic treatment-induced gingival enlargement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jul;140(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.033. |