Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Wound assessment is critical for developing effective treatment strategies, yet there is a scarcity of research on the assessment accuracy of clinical practitioners. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March to April 2025. It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, who evaluated 8 standardized wound cases. A total of 553 valid responses were collected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| wound care group | It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The weighted overall accuracy of wound assessments | Compare the assessment answers given by wound specialist to determine the accuracy rate of the assessment of the wound practitioners surveyed | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The average accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate) | An assessment response was scored as correct if it was consistent with the standard answer. Calculate the accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate) . | Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 553 valid responses were collected
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peking University Third Hospital | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100191 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29947700 | Result | Samaniego-Ruiz MJ, Llatas FP, Jimenez OS. Assessment of chronic wounds in adults: an integrative review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018 Jun 25;52:e03315. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2016050903315. English, Spanish. | |
| 21226781 | Result | Koschwanez HE, Broadbent E. The use of wound healing assessment methods in psychological studies: a review and recommendations. Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Feb;16(Pt 1):1-32. doi: 10.1348/135910710X524633. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| The average the accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis) |
An assessment response was scored as correct if it was consistent with the standard answer. Calculated the average accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis) |
| Baseline |