Short Course or Long Course Radiotherapy as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer : A Prospective, Open Label, Single Institution, Randomized, Parallel Arm Comparative Study
Short Course or Long Course Radiotherapy as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer : A Prospective, Open Label, Single Institution, Randomized, Parallel Arm Comparative Study
This study compares two standard radiotherapy approaches (short-course vs. long-course) given before surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The goal is to see which treatment is more effective and better tolerated.
The SHOOL study is a single-institution, open-label, randomized prospective study designed to evaluate and compare two internationally accepted total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). These strategies differ primarily in their radiotherapy schedule and include:
Arm A: Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT; 25 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week), followed by consolidation chemotherapy and surgery
Arm B: Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT; 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent Capecitabine over 5-5.5 weeks), followed by consolidation chemotherapy and surgery The study acronym "SHOOL" reflects the clinical dilemma of whether SHOrt-course Or Long-course radiotherapy offers better or more practical outcomes when delivered within a TNT framework.
This prospective study aims to explore how these two strategies compare in terms of tumour response (as measured by pathological complete response, pCR), toxicity, treatment compliance, feasibility, quality of life, and local recurrence rates at 3 and 5 years. Given that both arms represent evolving standards of care, this study is designed to generate real-world data that can guide institutional decision-making and inform future definitive trials.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
drshivendraonco@gmail.com919818975024