Catheter Ablation Versus Standard Conventional Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction - A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-national Study Using Two Systems for Rhythm Monitoring
Catheter Ablation Versus Standard Conventional Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction - A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-national Study Using Two Systems for Rhythm Monitoring
The clinical equipoise in the treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in patients with Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction/Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) reflects the scarcity of randomized trials on different treatment modalities. By generating high-quality, evidence-based, randomized data on the impact of treatment on hard outcomes, Catheter Ablation Versus Standard Conventional Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (CASTLE-HFpEF) will provide clinical decision-making guidance and help physicians in the management of patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF and AF.
The main hypothesis is that Catheter Ablation (CA) for AF is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF and AF compared to medical AF treatment strategies on top of optimal medical HF treatment. CASTLE-HFpEF aims to study these hard clinical outcomes in a randomized cohort of patients with AF and HFmrEF/HFpEF.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is highly prevalent and often coexists with atrial fibrillation (AF), but the optimal management strategy for AF in this population remains unclear. The CASTLE-HFpEF (CASTLE-AF II) trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study designed to evaluate whether catheter ablation of AF improves clinical outcomes compared with optimized medical therapy in patients with HFpEF.
Approximately 4,000 patients with HFpEF will undergo AF screening using an insertable cardiac monitor. Of these, 980 patients with newly diagnosed AF or AF detected during screening and with an AF burden > 1% will be randomized 1:1 to catheter ablation or guideline-directed medical therapy. All randomized patients will be followed for three years and monitored continuously for AF burden.
The primary endpoint is a hierarchical composite including all-cause mortality, stroke or transient ischemic attack, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and a clinically meaningful reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include total heart failure events, patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes, AF burden and rhythm control metrics, and echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function.
This study seeks to determine whether AF ablation improves clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with HFpEF and AF, and to define the role of rhythm control strategies in this population.
Inclusion Criteria:
≥18 years of age at screening visit.
Clinical signs and symptoms of HF (26).
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% within the past 12 months (most recent LVEF measurement)
Elevated NT-proBNP levels during screening or within 12 months prior to screening (most recent value; blood test):
Echocardiographic evidence of HFmrEF/HFpEF, with at least one of the following during screening or within the 12 months prior to screening:
Patients previously diagnosed with persistent AF since ≤4 months prior to screening with an indication for anticoagulation, OR Patients previously diagnosed with paroxysmal AF since ≤4 months prior to screening with an already known AF burden of ≥1% and/or an AF episode of ≥24 hours, with an indication for anticoagulation OR Patients with paroxysmal AF without known AF burden (diagnosed since ≤4 months prior to screening) or no previously diagnosed AF who are subsequently diagnosed with AF after receiving a single-lead electrocardiography (ECG) patch for 30 days. These patients should have an AF burden of ≥1% and/or an AF episode of ≥24 hours on the ECG patch (more details down below in section 8.1.1) and an indication for anticoagulation.
Stable optimal medical therapy for HFmrEF/HFpEF for at least 4 weeks (diuretics & SGLT2 inhibitors unless contraindicated; angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors & mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as deemed appropriate by the treating physician; Amiodarone and Beta-blockers are not considered for defining heart failure therapy).
Signed written informed consent obtained from the participant or participant's legal representative and ability for participant to comply with the requirements of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will be excluded from the study for any of the following reasons:
ksameer@tulane.edu504-988-3062
hfeng6@tulane.edu310-666-7248