Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| McGill University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a validation study to evaluate efficacy of two neuroplasticity-based, computerized cognitive training programs to improve neurological and neuropsychological health in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate will evaluate the impact of speed training to change cholinergic signaling, cognitive performance, and functional abilities in patients with MCI, as evidenced by [18F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol (FEOBV) positron-emission tomography (PET) and standard measures of cognition and function.
The investigators will employ a prospective, double-blind, parallel-arm, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial in patients with clinically-defined mild cognitive impairment aged 65 and above with a baseline MoCA of 18-26 inclusive.
Approximately 84 participants will be consented to ensure the successful completion of at least 70 participants (post 20% attrition). Participants will then complete the Screening (V0) assessments to determine eligibility. Following inclusion, participants will complete the Baseline (V1) assessments, PET imaging and structural MRI scan; participants will then be randomized into either the speed-based brain training or an active control of visual non-speeded computerized games and will engage in approximately 35 hours of program use for the 10-week Intervention Period. Following the 10-week intervention, participants will complete a Post-Intervention (V2) assessment, and PET imaging to evaluate changes in cognitive function. Participants will then stop using their assigned program for 3 months and return for a Follow-up (V3) end-of-study assessment and PET imaging to evaluate the endurance of changes in cognition, function, and behavior in the absence of further program use.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed Training | Experimental | Computerized speed-based cognitive training requiring a total maximum of 70 treatment sessions, up to 7 sessions per week, 30 minutes per session. |
|
| Executive Function Training | Active Comparator | Computerized executive function cognitive training requiring a total maximum of 70 treatment sessions, up to 7 sessions per week, 30 minutes per session. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computerized speed-based cognitive training | Other | Thirty minutes of training on computerized exercises that targets visual processing speed, memory, attention and alertness. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Global cholinergic signaling using [18F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol (FEOBV) positron-emission tomography (PET) | FEOBV standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) in the global cortex ROI. Higher score is better. | at 3 months (post-intervention) |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Memory-based cholinergic signaling in hippocampus gyrus using [18F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol (FEOBV) positron-emission tomography (PET) | FEOBV-PET standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) hippocampus gyrus using Matched MNI-space region via Hammers Atlas. Higher score is better. | at 3 months (post-intervention) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Potential participant must be 65 years or older at the time of study screening.
Potential participant must have MCI as defined by:
Potential participant must have a study partner/informant defined as any acquaintance (e.g., family member, friend, neighbor, clinician) who has regular (at least monthly) interactions (in person or remote) with the participant.
If potential participant reports use of medications typically prescribed for dementia such as, but not limited to, Namenda, Memantine, Namzaric, Donepezil, Aricept, Rivastigmine, Exelon, Razadyne, Galantamine, Reminyl, Aducanumab, Leqembi or Lecanemab, Donanemab, the dose must be stable for at least 12 weeks prior to study enrollment.
Potential participant must demonstrate adequate decisional capacity, in the judgment of the investigator, and capable of to making an informed decision regarding their participation in this research study.
Potential participant must be likely able to complete all study activities and outcome measures in the judgment of the investigator.
Potential participant must have the visual, auditory, and motors capacity to use the computerized intervention in the judgment of the investigator.
Potential participant must be able to communicate in either English or French.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah-Jane Grant, MA | Contact | 415-539-3130 | sarah-jane.grant@positscience.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mouna Attarha, PhD | Posit Science Corporation | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital | Montreal | Quebec | H3A 2B4 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Computerized executive function cognitive training | Other | Thirty minutes of training on computerized exercises that target executive function. |
|
| Change in Memory-based cholinergic signaling in parahippocampal gyrus using [18F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol (FEOBV) positron-emission tomography (PET) |
FEOBV-PET standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) parahippocampal gyrus using Matched MNI-space region via Hammers Atlas. Higher score is better |
| at 3 months (post-intervention) |
| Change in NIH EXAMINER Executive Composite Score | The NIH EXAMINER is a computer based battery of executive function tests which yields a total or 'composite' score to represent global executive functioning. Higher score is better. | at 3 months (post-intervention) and at 6 months (follow-up) |
| Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score | The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale is a validated assessment for evaluating severity of dementia. Lower score is better. | at 3 months (post-intervention) and at 6 months (follow-up) |
| Change in Double Decision train-to-task Assessment Score | This is a computerized assessment that serves as a positive control for task learning. A single exposure duration (in milliseconds) required for users to achieve approximately 80% criterion accuracy in identification of central and peripheral targets. Higher score is better. | at 3 months (post-intervention) and at 6 months (follow-up) |
| Change in Eye-tracking Test | Eye movements will be measured to determine acetylcholinergic function over time. A series of oculomotor tasks will be presented sequentially on an iPad Pro for approximately 20 minutes. Each task consists of visual stimuli designed to elicit specific eye movements. The iPad's front-facing camera will record facial and eye movements during task performance. | at 3 months (post-intervention) and at 6 months (follow-up) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided