Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to validate the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure (BP) estimates obtained over 24 hours using a PPG-based chest-patch device compared to the gold standard ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) method using an upper arm cuff-based oscillometric BP device, in both hypertensive and normotensive individuals referred by their provider to undergo a 24-hours ABPM for clinical indication. The Awake/Asleep test, which is the primary test recommended for automated wearable cuffless BP devices that are cuff-calibrated (based on the 2023 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) recommendations for the validation of cuffless blood pressure measuring devices), will be conducted in this study. The secondary aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and convenience of the PPG-based device.
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy, validity, and efficacy of the Biobeat PPG-based cuffless chest-worn monitor for continuous and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring compared with a standard cuff-based ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM). The study will follow the 2023 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) protocol for validating cuffless BP devices. The Biobeat device is a single-use, wireless, noninvasive patch applied to the chest that continuously measures blood pressure and other vital signs using photoplethysmography (PPG) technology.
The trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm validation study in adults undergoing 24-hour ABPM for any clinical indication. Participants will simultaneously wear both the Biobeat device and a standard ABPM for 24 hours. The Biobeat device will be calibrated with three reference cuff measurements at the start of monitoring. Data from both devices will be compared across awake, asleep, and total 24-hour periods to determine agreement in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
The primary objective is to demonstrate equivalence between the Biobeat PPG-based system and standard ABPM, with accuracy defined as a mean difference ≤5 mmHg and standard deviation ≤8 mmHg. Secondary endpoints include assessment of device performance across different blood pressure ranges and demographic subgroups, as well as participant comfort and usability. The study represents minimal risk to participants; the only potential adverse effect is mild skin irritation from the adhesive patch.
Successful validation will confirm that the Biobeat cuffless PPG-based device provides accurate, reliable 24-hour blood pressure monitoring comparable to existing ABPM systems, supporting its use as a comfortable, patient-friendly alternative for both clinical and ambulatory settings.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device: Non-invasive monitoring | Experimental | The study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, single arm, validation study that follows the 2023 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) recommendations for the validation of cuffless blood pressure measuring devices.27 There is no primary hypothesis. The study will validate 24-hours blood pressure monitoring using the investigational FDA-cleared device by comparing the level of agreement with parallel measurements obtained by the gold-standard upper arm. The Awake/Asleep test is the first and primary test recommended for this type of device to assess validity. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model BB-613WP | Device | During the study period, participants will undergo standard ABPM monitoring per clinical indication and wear a PPG-based monitor |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Endpoint | The accuracy and reliability of the PPG-based chest-patch device will be evaluated by comparing its blood pressure measurements with those obtained through the gold-standard upper arm cuff oscillometric ABPM method. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure values will be assessed. | 24 hours monitoring |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary Endpoint | Comparison of the compliance and completeness of the 2 measurement methods. The investigators will report the percentage of participants with at least 30% missed data (defining non-compliance or incomplete study). | 24 hours |
| Secondary Endpoint |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Other Endpoints (exploratory analyses) | Subgroup analysis based on sex: Sensitivity analyses will assess the agreement between systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (in mmHg) obtained from the Biobeat wearable monitor and the ABPM. Agreement will be evaluated using descriptive statistics and visual methods (e.g., Bland-Altman plots). No formal statistical subgroup comparisons will be performed | 24 hours |
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruth Caspi-Molad, M.S.c | Contact | +972546969474 | ruthie.caspi@bio-beat.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ziad Zoghby, M.D., M.B.A. | Mayo Clinic College of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiology, P.C. | Recruiting | Birmingham | Alabama | 35211 | United States |
This is proprietary company information.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Convenience of the device (participants' questionnaire) will be assessed. Participants will rate the experience on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating a higher satisfaction score for the following questions:
|
| 24 hours |
| Other Endpoints (exploratory analyses) | Subgroup analysis based on skin tone: Sensitivity analyses will assess the agreement between systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (in mmHg) obtained from the Biobeat wearable monitor and the ABPM. Agreement will be evaluated using descriptive statistics and visual methods (e.g., Bland-Altman plots). No formal statistical subgroup comparisons will be performed | 24 hours |
| Other Endpoints (exploratory analyses) | Subgroup analysis based on hypertension diagnosis (positive or negative) diagnosed by standard arm-based oscillometric ABPM: Sensitivity analyses will assess the agreement between systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (in mmHg) obtained from the Biobeat wearable monitor and the ABPM. Agreement will be evaluated using descriptive statistics and visual methods (e.g., Bland-Altman plots). No formal statistical subgroup comparisons will be performed | 24 hours |
| Other Endpoints (exploratory analyses) | Subgroup analysis based on participants with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter: Sensitivity analyses will assess the agreement between systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (in mmHg) obtained from the Biobeat wearable monitor and the ABPM. Agreement will be evaluated using descriptive statistics and visual methods (e.g., Bland-Altman plots). No formal statistical subgroup comparisons will be performed | 24 hours |
| Other Endpoints (exploratory analyses) | Subgroup analysis based on participants with pacemaker: Sensitivity analyses will assess the agreement between systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (in mmHg) obtained from the Biobeat wearable monitor and the ABPM. Agreement will be evaluated using descriptive statistics and visual methods (e.g., Bland-Altman plots). No formal statistical subgroup comparisons will be performed | 24 hours |
| Other Endpoints (exploratory analyses) | Subgroup analysis based on day vs. night analysis: Sensitivity analyses will assess the agreement between systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (in mmHg) obtained from the Biobeat wearable monitor and the ABPM. Agreement will be evaluated using descriptive statistics and visual methods (e.g., Bland-Altman plots). No formal statistical subgroup comparisons will be performed. | 24 hours |
| Mayo Clinic | Recruiting | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85259 | United States |
|
| Mayo Clinic | Recruiting | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
|
| U Health-University of Miami Health System | Recruiting | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
|
| Mayo Clinic | Recruiting | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
|
| HaEmek Hospital | Recruiting | Afula | 1834111 | Israel |
|
| The Holy Family Hospital Nazareth | Recruiting | Nazareth | 1641100 | Israel |
|
| Sheba Medical Center | Recruiting | Ramat Gan | Israel |
|
| Maccabi Healthcare | Recruiting | Tel Aviv | Israel |
|
| Instituto Auxologico Italiano | Not yet recruiting | Milan | Italy |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D006973 | Hypertension |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided