Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was planned using a randomised controlled experimental design to determine the effectiveness of digital game-based teaching in the development of ethical sensitivity and ethical decision-making processes among nursing students.
The most significant contribution this study will make to the literature is its systematic demonstration of the effects of a digital game-based teaching method on the development of ethical sensitivity and ethical decision-making processes in the context of nursing education. Currently, ethics education is mostly conducted using traditional methods, and it is known that students experience difficulties in transferring what they learn in theoretical education to practice. This study makes a unique contribution by demonstrating that digital games can support students' ethical thinking and decision-making skills by offering interactive and experience-based learning opportunities. Furthermore, the study aims to expand the limited literature on the use of digital game-based teaching in ethics education in nursing and to provide evidence-based data on the integration of technological innovations in ethics education. In this respect, the research is of a nature that will strengthen the pedagogical foundations of nursing education and pioneer the development of student-centred and innovative teaching strategies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Both the experimental and comparison groups will receive a reminder lecture from the researcher on ethical principles and codes prior to the applications. Participants in the experimental group will simultaneously play digital games and participate in classroom group work after the reminder lesson. |
|
| Comparison | Other | They will only participate in in-class group work. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital game | Other | Digital Game: The developed digital game aims to enhance medical students' ethical awareness and decision-making skills. The digital game first provides students with reminders about ethical principles. The game covers a four-week process, focusing on a specific ethical principle each week. Each weekly module presents two cases supported by animated visuals written by the researcher, reviewed by experts, and created by the software company. After watching and reading the cases, students answer related questions. The modules and principles covered are as follows: Week 1 (Do No Harm/Beneficence): Cases related to treatment refusal and palliative care compliance. Week 2 (Autonomy/Respect): Cases related to organ donation decisions and chemotherapy refusal. Week 3 (Justice/Equity): Cases related to resource (air mattress) allocation and patient prioritisation. Week 4 (Confidentiality/Privacy): Cases related to HIV diagnosis confidentiality and psychiatric service confidentiality. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adapted Ethical Sensitivity Scale for Nursing Students | This scale determines the ethical sensitivity levels of nursing students. The 7-point Likert-type scale (1=Strongly disagree, 7=Strongly agree) consists of 30 items and six subscales. Items 8, 24, and 29 are reverse-scored. The total score ranges from 30 to 210; a high score indicates high ethical sensitivity. Item averages are evaluated as 7-5.9 (very important), 5.8-5 (important), 4.9-3.1 (neutral), and below 3.1 (unimportant). | 3 times; a week before implementation, a week after implementation, 2 months after implementation |
| The Ethical Dilemma Test in Nursing | The scale developed under the name 'Nursing Dilemma Test' aims to identify ethical issues in nursing and consists of six scenarios. Each scenario has three sections (A, B, C): Section A (Action): Measures the decision to be made in the face of an ethical dilemma (to act/not to act/to be undecided). Section B (Thinking Style): Determines the 'Principled Thinking' (NPT - importance given to ethical principles) and 'Practical Thinking' (PT - importance given to environmental factors) scores by ranking six statements based on Kohlberg's theory. Section C (Familiarity): Calculates the 'familiarity' score by questioning the case experience. Scoring: NPT Score: ranges from 18 to 66. PT Score: ranges from 6 to 36. Familiarity Score: 6-17 (familiar), 18-30 (unfamiliar). Reliability (Turkish Version): Cronbach's Alpha: NPT (0.59), PT (0.50). Test-Retest: NPT (0.77), PT (0.73). | 3 times; a week before implementation, a week after implementation, 2 months after implementation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale | This scale assesses students' satisfaction with education and their attitudes towards self-confidence in learning. The 5-point Likert-type scale (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree), consisting of 13 items in total, has two subscales: Satisfaction with Learning (5 items) Self-Confidence (8 items) Items are reverse-coded. The total score ranges from 13 to 65; a high score indicates high satisfaction and self-confidence. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the original scale were found to be Satisfaction (0.94) and Self-Confidence (0.87). The Cronbach's alpha values for the Turkish form were found to be Satisfaction (0.89), Self-Confidence (0.83), and Scale Total (0.90). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Students must:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Furkan Keles, PhD Student | Contact | +90 507 491 77 96 | FurkanS_1996@hotmail.com | |
| Funda Büyükyılmaz, Prof. Dr. | Contact | +90 505 454 92 16 | funda.buyukyilmaz@iuc.edu.tr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Furkan Keles, PhD Student | Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa | Principal Investigator |
| Funda Büyükyılmaz, Prof. Dr. | Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of two groups, comprising one experimental group and one control group
Not provided
Not provided
Participants do not know which group they will be in.
|
| In-class group work | Other | Face-to-face case analysis will be conducted over 4 weeks. These sessions are scheduled outside the course programme, once a week for 40 minutes. A total of 4 cases, each relating to an ethical principle, will be given to students in printed form at the beginning of each session, and they will be asked to analyse them simultaneously. Before the exercises, students will be explained how to analyse the cases. |
|
| Once; a week after implementation |