Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, we want to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a CAEH test in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma. We want to develop a CAEH test to differentiate patients with different types of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction from healthy volunteers and to evaluate whether the respiratory phenotype induced by cold air inhalation differs between subjects with asthma and healthy subjects. Furthermore, we want to evaluate whether the CAEH test is more robust over time compared to the EVH test. Previously, our lab has demonstrated that submaximal exercise at subfreezing temperatures in a climate chamber (-5°C) induces an acute respiratory response in patients with asthma and in healthy subjects who have been exposed to high PM10 (unpublished data). Finally, This study will serve as a preliminary study for a subsequent prospective study in which the results and optimized protocol obtained in this study will be used to further evaluate the feasibility of using this CAEH as a diagnostic tool in asthma compared to EIB (CLARINET2). The present study is required to develop a standardized CAEH test in a safe and feasible manner. This study will also help to identify appropriate endpoints (FEV1, multiple breath washout test, biomarkers…) of the subsequent studies.
In this study, we aim to develop a safe and feasible cold air (-15°C) eucapnic hyperventilation (CAEH) test protocol in which we can compare the lower airway responses between healthy volunteers and subjects with asthma. Consequently, we want to evaluate the effect of cold air inhalation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms, airway integrity, and local and systemic inflammation.
Primary endpoints
The primary endpoint of this study is to compare proportional change in FEV1, (% decrease) after a CAEH test in healthy volunteers and patients with mild to moderate asthma. Post-exposure will be calculated as a time-weighted average over the 30 min after the CAEH test. At each time point (pre-, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes post-exposure), FEV1 will be measured in triplicate.
Secondary endpoints
We want to evaluate whether and to what extent the inhalation of cold air during this CAEH test can induce changes in respiratory symptoms (including dyspnea, cough, mucus production, etc.), affects lower airway integrity (airway obstruction (FEV1/FVC), small airway dysfunction (FEF 25/75, lung ventilation inhomogeneity (LCI), bronchial hyperreactivity (PC20 AMP)) and whether it induces (local or systemic) inflammation (different biomarkers in sputum and blood, as defined in section 5.2).
These changes will be compared between healthy volunteers and predisposed subjects with mild to moderate asthma. The abovementioned responses and the proportional change in FEV1 after the CAEH test will be compared to a standard (21°C room air) eucapnic hyperventilation (EVH) test. Furthermore, we will compare the results obtained in this study to the results obtained in the ALASCAIR study of dr. Tatjana Decaesteker. Finally, the effects of the CAEH will be correlated to the amount of air pollution the subject was exposed to, in the days prior to the test (as this may have an effect on the responses to cold air inhalation in healthy volunteers, as found in the Alascair study (unpublished data)), by means of different questionnaires evaluating life style and exposure to air pollution (SF-36, AQLQ, ACQ, SQUASH,…).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers with negative histamine provocation challenge | Other | Healthy volunteers with negative histamine provocation challenge will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation |
|
| Healthy volunteers with positive histamine provocation challenge | Other | Healthy volunteers with positive histamine provocation challenge will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation |
|
| Patients with asthma | Other | Patients with asthma will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold air challenge | Device | This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportional change in FEV1 after hyperventilation challenge | The proportional change in FEV1 after hyperventilation challenges compared to baseline were measured. | After each hyperventilation challenge: pre, immediately, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes after the challenge |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in symptoms | We want to evaluate changes in respiratory symptoms after challenge. The degree of dyspnea and cough will be determined using BORG scale. This is a 0 to 10 scale. | From the first hyperventilation challenge until 1 day after the second |
| Lung function changes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Group specific:
Histamine positive healthy controls: histamine bronchial challenge test (< 8 mg/ml) at screening Healthy controls: histamine bronchial challenge test (≥ 8 mg/ml) at screening
Patients with asthma:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lieven Dupont | KU Leuven/UZ Leuven | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001249 | Asthma |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001982 | Bronchial Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Healthy volunteers will be compared to patients with astma
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
Changes in lung function (FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75, LCI, PEF...) were measured after hyperventilation challenge |
| After each hyperventilation challenge |
| Inflammatory parameters | Inflammation was assessed in sputum and blood. Cytokines, allergic response, cellular response, DAMPs and measures of epithelial integrity were assessed. Differential cell count will be performed on sputum samples, determining eosinophilic (> 3% eosinophils), neutrophilic (> 61% neutrophils), pauci-granulocytic (< 3% eosinophilic, < 61% neutrophils) and mixed granulocytic (> 3% eosinophilic, > 61% neutrophils). Cytokines will be determined in sputum supernatant with a U-plex assay. Airway inflammation is determined with FeNO. < 25 ppm = eosinophilic inflammation less likely, between 25 - 50 ppm = need further interpretation with additional information and > 50 ppm = indication of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Systemic inflammation will be measured in serum using U-plex assay. allergic response is measured with skin prick automated test on 10 allergens and in serum with total IgE. | At baseline and after each hyperventilation challenge |
| D012130 |
| Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |