Prospective Evaluation of Silk Fibroin Versus 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Incision Dressings Following ACL Reconstruction
Prospective Evaluation of Silk Fibroin Versus 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Incision Dressings Following ACL Reconstruction
The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of early postoperative skin complications including allergic contact dermatitis, blistering, and erythema between silk fibroin incision dressings and cyanoacrylate closure in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial conducted at a single academic medical center comparing a silk fibroin adhesive incision dressing (SYLKE) to a cyanoacrylate-based skin closure system (Dermabond or Prineo) in patients undergoing primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Participants are randomized 1:1 using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by operating surgeon. Wound closure is standardized across all participants prior to dressing application, ensuring that deep and dermal closure are identical between groups and independent of allocation.
The primary outcome is the incidence of early postoperative skin complications, including allergic contact dermatitis, blistering, erythema, and other incision-related complications, assessed at the first postoperative visit (7-14 days). Secondary outcomes include patient-reported comfort, itch, incision-site pain, satisfaction, and rehabilitation interference at approximately 30 days; dressing-related complications requiring clinical intervention through 30 days, captured via blinded electronic medical record review; and scar quality at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS v2.0), with the observer component scored by one unblinded clinical assessor and two fully blinded independent raters.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: