Effectiveness of Complete Decongestive-versus Non-pneumattic- Compression Therapy in Patients With Post-mastectomy Lymphedema
Effectiveness of Complete Decongestive-versus Non-pneumattic- Compression Therapy in Patients With Post-mastectomy Lymphedema
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of Complete Decongestive Therapy and Non-Pneumatic Compression Therapy, both combined with routine physical therapy, in reducing pain and edema volume, improving range of motion, respiratory function, inflammatory markers, and overall quality of life in patients with post-mastectomy lymphedema.
Post-mastectomy lymphedema (PML) is a chronic, progressive, and disabling complication affecting breast cancer survivors due to disruption of lymphatic drainage following surgery or radiotherapy. It leads to swelling, pain, restricted range of motion, recurrent infections, and reduced quality of life.
Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) - a multimodal approach involving manual lymphatic drainage, compression bandaging, skin care, and exercise - is currently the gold standard for lymphedema management. However, CDT is time-consuming, therapist-dependent, and often poorly tolerated or inaccessible for long-term self-management.
Non-Pneumatic Compression Therapy (NPCD) is a newer, portable, and wearable device that provides gradient sequential compression while allowing mobility and daily activity during treatment. It potentially improves adherence, comfort, and patient satisfaction.
Limited comparative research exists evaluating the relative effectiveness of CDT and NPCD in post-mastectomy lymphedema. This study aims to fill this gap and determine which approach produces superior clinical and functional outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
fatima.sahar0212@gmail.com+923371683000