Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if 10% Lidocaine spray can reduce local pain caused by intravenous (IV) intubation among women. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
Intravenous (IV) cannulation is a technique in which a cannula is placed inside a vein through the patient's skin. It is the most commonly performed procedure in clinical settings. Nevertheless, it is also the second most painful procedure that significantly elevates a patient's anxiety levels. IV is required for every patient before their operation. Managing this pre-operative pain has been listed as an indicator of the quality of anesthesia. As such, various interventions have been conducted to reduce the pain caused by intravenous intubation among patients. Non-pharmacological approaches to reduce this pain include using the flash of light to distract patients, cough tricks, Valsalva manoeuvers, and vapor coolant spray, essential oil . Pharmacological approaches for reducing local pain caused by IV include Lidocaine cream/patch/spray, EMLA (mixture of Lidocaine and Prilocain), diclofenac transdermal, and Piroxicam gel . However, none of these methods exhibited a clear superiority over the others. There is no clear consensus about which method is the best option to relieve pain induced by IV. Among pharmacological approaches, using Lidocaine provides some promising results in reducing pain related to IV insertion. Among the different dosage forms, Lidocaine spray is the most convenient with a fast effect. It is quickly absorption within 1 to 5 minutes. However, inconsistent results have been reported regarding this application . Notably, previous trials conducted in different populations, ages, settings, and needle sizes somewhat cause bias in the results. As such, more trials with rigorous design should be implemented to provide strong evidence to support the role of Lidocaine spray in reducing local paint caused by IV intubation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Lidocaine spray on relieving local pain caused by intravenous intubation. To ensure a homogeneous population, we chose the participants who were women before their Cesarean section delivery (C-section).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 2 | Placebo Comparator | Participants will be given three sprays sterilized saline solution 3 minutes before the interventionist performed the insertion of a catheter into their vein |
|
| Group 3 | No Intervention | Non intervention will be perform rather than usual care | |
| Intervention | Experimental | Participants will be given three sprays of 10% Lidocaine (Lidocaine 10% pump spray, Egis) 3 minutes before the interventionist performed the insertion of a catheter into their vein |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lidocain spray | Drug | Applying 3 spray of 10% Lidocaine to the IV insertion site in women before their C-section |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain score | The Pain score will be measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). This is a validated, subjective measure of pain. It is typically a 10-cm line, used to assess a person's perception of pain, discomfort, or other subjective feelings by having them mark a point on the line that best represents their experience. It ranged from 0 to 10, with 0 meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "worst pain ever". The greater score, indicate greater pain. | After the nurse insert the IV into the participants |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse event | Side effects cause by Lidocaine | List any side effect of Lidocaine reported by participant or observed by PI within 2 hours after the IV has been inserted |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
• Participants who were emergency cases for going to a C-section delivery
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huong TX Hoang, Dr | Contact | +84982501850 | huong.hoangthixuan@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn | |
| Anh Pham, Master | Contact | +8483866313 | lequynhtrang142@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Huong Hoang, PhD | Phenikaa University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30420917 | Background | Luangtangvarodom W, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Pattaraarchachai J, Bhamarapravatana K, Suwannarurk K. The Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray in Pain Relief during Outpatient-Based Endometrial Sampling: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pain Res Treat. 2018 Oct 21;2018:1238627. doi: 10.1155/2018/1238627. eCollection 2018. | |
| 28285862 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 25, 2025 | Sep 30, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sterilized saline solution | Combination Product | Participants will be given three sprays sterilized saline solution 3 minutes before the interventionist performed the insertion of a catheter into their vein |
|
| Dalvandi A, Ranjbar H, Hatamizadeh M, Rahgoi A, Bernstein C. Comparing the effectiveness of vapocoolant spray and lidocaine/procaine cream in reducing pain of intravenous cannulation: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1064-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.039. Epub 2017 Feb 27. |
| 35502334 | Background | Kartufan FF. Padded Dressing with Lidocaine HCL for Reducing Pain during Intravenous Cannulation in Adult Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Apr 23;2022:6128557. doi: 10.1155/2022/6128557. eCollection 2022. |
| 28799984 | Background | Datema J, Veldhuis J, Bekhof J. Lidocaine spray as a local analgesic for intravenous cannulation: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(1):24-28. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000496. |
| 16507182 | Background | Basaranoglu G, Basaranoglu M, Erden V, Delatioglu H, Pekel AF, Saitoglu L. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvres on venepuncture pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jul;23(7):591-3. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000160. Epub 2006 Mar 1. |
| 33712356 | Background | Alan N, Khorshid L. Evaluation of Efficacy of Valsalva Maneuver During Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation on Pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2022 Apr;23(2):220-224. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Mar 9. |
| 23985532 | Background | Hocking G, Weightman WM, Smith C, Gibbs NM, Sherrard K. Measuring the quality of anaesthesia from a patient's perspective: development, validation, and implementation of a short questionnaire. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Dec;111(6):979-89. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet284. Epub 2013 Aug 28. |
| 25624538 | Background | Goudra BG, Galvin E, Singh PM, Lions J. Effect of site selection on pain of intravenous cannula insertion: A prospective randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Nov-Dec;58(6):732-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.147166. |
| 22981661 | Background | Sebbane M, Claret PG, Lefebvre S, Mercier G, Rubenovitch J, Jreige R, Eledjam JJ, de La Coussaye JE. Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.051. Epub 2012 Sep 13. |