Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of NT 201 compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe platysma prominence. The study will be conducted in two periods: Main Period (MP) and Open label Extension Period (OLEX).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Period: NT 201 | Experimental | Participants will receive NT 201 IM injection, once on Day 1 of the MP. |
|
| Main Period: NT 201 Matching Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants will receive NT 201 matching placebo IM injection, once on Day 1 of the MP. |
|
| OLEX Period: NT 201 | Experimental | Participants will receive a reinjection of NT 201 IM injection, once on Day 1 of OLEX period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT 201 | Drug | Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin A (150 kiloDalton [kD], free of complexing proteins), powder for solution for injection. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or Grade 2 and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both the Investigator's Assessment and Participant's Self-Assessment Using the Merz Aesthetics Platysma Scale Dynamic (MAPSD) At Week 2 of MP | MAPSD is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using MAPSD at Week 2 of MP | MAPSD is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Disclosure Manager Merz Aesthetics | Contact | +1 984-301-3095 | Aesthetic.Trials@merz.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Merz Medical Expert | Merz Aesthetics GmbH | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Lyon | 69006 | France | ||
| Merz Investigative Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| NT 201 Placebo | Drug | NT 201 matching-placebo. |
|
| Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPSD at Week 2 of MP | MAPSD is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Achievement of at Least a +1 (Somewhat Satisfied) Score Using the Participant's Satisfaction Questionnaire at Week 2 of MP | Participants satisfaction questionnaire responses will be rated on a scale ranging from +3 (very satisfied) to -3 (very dissatisfied). A higher score indicates satisfaction. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both the Investigator's Assessment and Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPSD at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP | MAPSD is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement. | At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP |
| Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using MAPSD at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP | MAPSD is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement. | At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP |
| Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPSD at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP | MAPSD is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement. | At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP |
| Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)-Platysmal Bands at maximum contraction Based on the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP | GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the GAIS-Platysmal Bands at maximum contraction Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP | GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the GAIS-Platysmal Bands at Rest Based on the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP | GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the GAIS-Platysmal Bands at Rest Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP | GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score Using the GAIS-Lower Face Contour According to the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP | GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score Using the GAIS-Lower Face Contour According to the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP | GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement. | At Week 2 of MP |
| Recruiting |
| Munich |
| Bavaria |
| 80539 |
| Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Blankenfelde-Mahlow | Brandenburg | 15831 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Potsdam | Brandenburg | 14467 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Friedrichsdorf | Hesse | 61381 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Kassel | Hesse | 34117 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44793 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Düsseldorf | North Rhine-Westphalia | 40212 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Drensteinfurt | 48317 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Hamburg | 20146 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Hamburg | 29354 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Wuppertal | 42287 | Germany |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Krakow | Lesser Poland Voivodeship | 30-002 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Oświęcim | Lesser Poland Voivodeship | 32-600 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Lublin | Lublin Voivodeship | 20-607 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 00-716 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 01-142 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 02-482 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 02-953 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Bialystok | Podlaskie Voivodeship | 15-453 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Gdynia | Pomeranian Voivodeship | 81-537 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Warsaw | 02-962 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Lodz | Łódź Voivodeship | 90-436 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski | Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship | 27-400 | Poland |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Pamplona | Navarre | 31008 | Spain |
| Merz Investigative Site | Recruiting | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C545476 | incobotulinumtoxinA |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided