Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| self funded | Other Identifier | Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine, Cairo Univeristy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial aims to compare two bone augmentation techniques for patients with anterior horizontal maxillary bone defects:
Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Technique using S1 Bovine Bone Graft Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique (Khoury Technique). The study will evaluate the amount of bone gain and the quality of bone formation after six months using radiographic (CBCT) and histomorphometric analysis. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups and followed for six months post-surgery to assess bone regeneration, surgical outcomes, and potential complications.
This randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University. The study addresses the clinical challenge of horizontal maxillary bone defects, which complicate implant placement and require effective augmentation techniques.
Two techniques will be compared:
Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone: Using S1 Bovine Bone Graft mixed with autogenous bone chips in a 70:30 ratio.
Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique (Khoury): Using autogenous cortical bone shells harvested from the mandible combined with S1 Bovine Bone.
The primary outcome is horizontal bone gain assessed by CBCT immediately after surgery and at six months before implant placement. Secondary outcomes include histomorphometric analysis of bone core biopsies to evaluate the quality of bone regeneration.
Randomization will be performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio using computer-generated sequences. Patients will be blinded to the intervention, and follow-up will be conducted at 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively.
The trial aims to determine whether the less invasive sticky bone technique can achieve comparable or superior bone regeneration outcomes compared to the traditional bone shell method while reducing donor site morbidity and surgical complexity
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autogenous + Bovine Sticky Bone | Experimental | Participants in this group will undergo maxillary horizontal ridge augmentation using a mixture of autogenous bone chips and S1 Bovine Bone Graft in a 70:30 ratio, prepared as Sticky Bone in the area of the defect |
|
| Autogenous + Bovine Bone Shell Technique (Khoury) | Active Comparator | Participants in this group will undergo horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous cortical bone plates harvested from the mandibular ramus fixed to the recipient site, with S1 Bovine Bone Graft used to fill the gap between plates and the alveolar bone. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| anterior horizontal maxillary bone augmentation using autogenous and bovine sticky bone | Procedure | Participants in this group will undergo maxillary horizontal ridge augmentation using a mixture of autogenous bone chips and S1 Bovine Bone Graft in a 70:30 ratio. The graft will be prepared as Sticky Bone and applied to the defect site for augmentation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Alveolar ridge bone gain | The primary outcome measure will be the amount of horizontal bone gain at the augmented site measured in millimeters using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Measurements will be taken immediately after augmentation and at 6 months before implant placement. | Baseline (immediately post-surgery) 6 months after augmentation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of bone formation | Bone core biopsy will be obtained at the time of implant placement to assess the percentage of newly formed bone, residual graft material, and connective tissue using histomorphometric analysis. | Up to 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cairo University | Al Manyal | Giza Governorate | 12613 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39364817 | Background | Shaker AE, Salem AS, El-Farag SA, Abdel-Rahman FH, El-Kenawy MH. Comparison of Khoury's Bone Shell Technique vs Titanium-reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for 3D-bone Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Jun 1;25(6):518-526. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3704. | |
| 36278663 |
Not provided
Not provided
The decision to share individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been made. Data sharing will depend on institutional review board (IRB) approvals, institutional policies, and participant consent. If data sharing is approved in the future, detailed information about the process, access conditions, and timelines will be provided.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| anterior horizontal maxillary bone augmentation using autogenous and bovine bone shell technique (khoury) | Procedure | Participants in this group will undergo maxillary horizontal ridge augmentation using the Khoury Bone Shell Technique, combining autogenous bone blocks and Bovine Bone Graft to reconstruct the alveolar ridge. The graft will be fixed and stabilized to provide a rigid shell for bone regeneration. |
|
| Tony JB, Parthasarathy H, Tadepalli A, Ponnaiyan D, Alamoudi A, Kamil MA, Alzahrani KJ, Alsharif KF, Halawani IF, Alnfiai MM, Ramachandran L, Balaji TM, Patil S. CBCT Evaluation of Sticky Bone in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with and without Collagen Membrane-A Randomized Parallel Arm Clinical Trial. J Funct Biomater. 2022 Oct 19;13(4):194. doi: 10.3390/jfb13040194. |
| 39205712 | Background | Yazhini P K, Suresh N, Kaarthikeyan G. Subperiosteal Ridge Augmentation Technique Utilizing Sticky Bone: A Case Series. Cureus. 2024 Jul 29;16(7):e65641. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65641. eCollection 2024 Jul. |
| 34501399 | Background | Barbu HM, Iancu SA, Rapani A, Stacchi C. Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 31;10(17):3953. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173953. |
| 38786535 | Background | De Angelis P, Cavalcanti C, Manicone PF, Liguori MG, Rella E, De Rosa G, Palmieri A, D'Addona A. A Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration vs. the Shell Technique Using Xenogeneic Bone Blocks in Horizontal Bone Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 9;12(5):137. doi: 10.3390/dj12050137. |