Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Gilead Sciences | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label, single center study to evaluate implementation of a pharmacist-managed delivery of L4P in a community pharmacy setting and the impact of twice-yearly vs. quarterly PrEP visits on STI rates.
This is a prospective observational study enrolling 75 subjects into the cohort to report on the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacist-managed L4P in a community pharmacy setting. The study will be conducted as a longitudinal, observational, mixed methods evaluation of the operation of this service for 1 year using existing pharmacy clinic models and infrastructure. The investigators will also conduct a retrospective cohort study to assess the impact on PrEP visits every 3 months versus every 6 months. All subjects must meet all eligibility criteria to participate in the study. Subjects will have the opportunity to start or switch to commercially available L4P. PrEP initiation will be defined as subjects starting PrEP who have not taken PrEP for the previous 3 months. All FDA-approved PrEP products indicated for each individual will be offered, and each patient will have the opportunity to participate in the study. Patients interested in initiating will be offered the opportunity to enroll and provide informed consent. Initiation of L4P will be based on medical, laboratory, and coverage qualifications.
Patients on L4P will be managed by a pharmacist provider utilizing a CDTA based on the DHHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV and the FDA-approved label for lenacapavir. L4P will be administered on Day 1, Day 2 (oral loading dose only), and every six months thereafter. Subjects will be followed for 12 months, and electronic health record data will be collected retrospectively throughout the study duration. Subjects will be given a survey 4 to 6 weeks after initiation and at study end. Subjects will have the option to discontinue participation at any time for any reason, and standards of care for discontinuation will be followed. Participants who do not meet criteria for management under the CDTA (positive HIV screening, pregnancy, or other complicated health conditions) will be referred to an existing primary care provider or the clinic medical director for further management. Referrals for substance use treatment, mental health, and primary care services will also be provided. At the end of the study, each patient will complete a survey and be offered the option to continue commercially available L4P.
L4P will be administered by the pharmacist provider. A pharmacist training program will be created by the study team and completed by all pharmacists providing L4P services. Pharmacies are health care settings, and all safety measures will be followed for the administration of L4P. These measures include informed consent and counseling on risks versus benefits, post-injection observation, policies and procedures in place for emergency services and allergic reactions. Access to epinephrine and diphenhydramine will be onsite. All pharmacist providers will have CPR and blood-borne pathogen training. Pharmacists who enroll in the study and provide informed consent will be given a survey at study start and end. The pharmacist surveys will be validated psychometric assessments measuring implementation outcomes often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success: Acceptability of Intervention (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility Intervention Measure (FIM).
A pharmacy technician will assist with administrative tasks such as scheduling, billing, prior authorizations, benefit verification, and patient assistance programs. Specific attention will be given to overcoming billing barriers. Commercial drug product will be utilized in this study. To create a sustainable program after funding ceases, real-world reimbursement programs, such as insurance and patient assistance programs, will be used to reimburse pharmacist time for performing these clinical services and for the reimbursement of commercial drug product. Uninsured patients will have the opportunity to participate. The pharmacy technician will assist patients in enrolling in state and commercial drug assistance programs to cover service and medication costs.
The study intervention is divided into two aims. For Aim 1, the investigators will conduct a prospective observational study enrolling 75 subjects into the cohort to report on the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacist-managed L4P in a community pharmacy setting. This will be conducted as a longitudinal, observational, mixed methods evaluation of operating this service for 1 year. The primary objective is feasibility as measured by retention. Additional feasibility outcomes include adherence, persistence, and seroconversion collected through EHR review. Secondary outcomes include acceptability (as determined by subject and provider surveys), STI rates, HIV seroconversions, reasons for discontinuation, and pharmacist and patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators. In Aim 2, subjects enrolled in the L4P cohort will have the option of conducting STI testing every 6 months versus every 3 months. A retrospective matched cohort study will be conducted to assess differences in retention and STI positivity rates between groups. All participants will be able to undergo testing in between monitoring visits. The primary outcome measure will be adherence to PrEP medication as measured by the proportion of participants who successfully attend their PrEP monitoring visits over 12 months. Secondary outcomes include visit frequency and STI positivity rate. Visit frequency will be measured as the overall number of PrEP visits and in-between STI visits per person-year.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIM 1: lenacapavir for PrEP managed by pharmacists | Experimental | prospective observational study enrolling 75 subjects into the cohort to report on the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacist-managed L4P in a community pharmacy setting. This will be done as a longitudinal, observational, mixed methods study to report on experiences of operating this service for 1 year. |
|
| AIM 2: retrospective cohort study to assess the impact on PrEP visits every 3 months vs. every 6 mon | Experimental | The 75 subjects who provided informed consent will be retrospectively case control matched to a cohort of people for age, gender identity, insurance status, postal code, predictors of STI risk, number of partners, genders of partners, condomless sex, receptive anal sex. Adjustments will be made to matching ratio if all matches are not found. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenacapavir long-acting | Drug | Until recently, only oral formulations of PrEP were available. With the availability of long-acting PrEP injectables, new strategies will need to be developed to deliver this new treatment option. The availability of L4P offers an opportunity to expand PrEP access outside traditional healthcare settings. However, data on the feasibility and acceptability of L4P in community pharmacies is lacking. Community pharmacies are ideal for L4P due to their accessibility and the ability to utilize both pharmacy and medical billing for reimbursement of medication and clinical services, unlike traditional healthcare settings. Pharmacists are one of the most highly accessible healthcare professionals in the community. There are over 60,000 community pharmacies across the U.S. The study will evaluate implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability), real-world effectiveness, and whether L4P can be used for same day starts or treatment switches. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Retention Rate | Calculated by dividing the number of participants present in the study at 1 year by the number of individuals enrolled | 1 year |
| Adherence Rate | Collected as the proportion of injections that are successfully administered during each target injection window period over 1 year | 1 year |
| Persistence | Measured as the length of time a person remains on L4P for over 1 year | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient acceptability of a pharmacist managed L4P service. | Patient Acceptability will be measured by the HIV-PrevTSQs questionnaire at baseline (for those already on an FDA approved PrEP regimen within 3 months from enrollment), 4-6 weeks and 1 year and HIV-PrevTSQc at 1 year. It is a 6 point Likert scale questionnaire which higher scores indicating higher acceptability. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| L4P initiations | Number of L4P starts by end of 1 year | 1 year |
| Time to first injection | Time it takes to get from enrollment to first injection |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelley-Ross Pharmacy | Seattle | Washington | 98122 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37938875 | Background | Groot Bruinderink ML, Boyd A, Coyer L, Boers S, Blitz L, Brand JM, Gotz HM, Stip M, Woudstra J, Yap K, Vermey K, Matser A, Feddes AR, Jongen VW, Prins M, Hoornenborg E, van Harreveld F, Schim van der Loeff MF, Davidovich U. Online-Mediated HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Care and Reduced Monitoring Frequency for Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial (EZI-PrEP Study). JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 8;12:e51023. doi: 10.2196/51023. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Advancing team based care through collaborative practice agreements: a resource and implementation guide for adding pharmacists to the care team. Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U. | View source |
Not provided
Only de-identified individual participant data underlying the results will be shared upon reasonable request after publication.
after last patient, last visit for 1 year, for 1 year
Access will be granted following review of a written proposal and execution of a data use agreement
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 14, 2025 | Sep 29, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Sep 14, 2025 | Sep 29, 2025 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059039 | Standard of Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019984 | Quality Indicators, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
Not provided
Not provided
Aim 1 is a prospective observational study enrolling 75 subjects into the cohort to report on the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacist-managed L4P in a community pharmacy setting. Aim 2 is a retrospective matched cohort study to assess the differences in retention and STI positivity rates between groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Standard of Care (SOC) | Other | In aim 2, subjects enrolled in the L4P cohort will have the option of conducting STI testing every 6 months versus every 3 months. A retrospective matched cohort study will be conducted to assess the differences in retention and STI positivity rates between groups. All participants will be able to get tested in between monitoring visits. |
|
| Pharmacist Acceptability of a pharmacist managed L4P service | Assessed using the FIM, AIM, and IAM surveys at baseline and 1 year. These surveys are a 5 point Likert scale with a range of scores from 4-20. The higher the score, the more favorable the perceptions. | 1 year |
| Visit Frequency between people receiving PrEP visits every 3 months versus every 6 months. | Visit frequency will be measured as the overall number of PrEP visits and in-between STI visits per person year. | 1 year |
| STI Positivity Rates in 6-month versus 3-month PrEP monitoring visits. | Measured as the number of chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis diagnosed per 100 visits. | 1 year |
| 1 year |
| HIV seroconversions | Rate of HIV infections at the end of 1 year | 1 year |
| STI Rates | Rate of STI infections (chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis) at the end of 1 year | 1 year |
| Reasons for discontinuation | collect verbally or written reasons for early discontinuation | 1 year |
| Adverse Reactions | rates of adverse reactions at the end of 1 year | 1 year |
| Gilead Sciences, Inc. (n.d.). Yetztugo™ (lenacapavir) tablets for oral use: Prescribing information | View source |