Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Total knee arthroplasty is a golden standard procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, up to 20% of the patients are not satisfied with the outcome. Recently, robotic-assisted TKAs have been developed to offer individual alignment and to achieve accuracy in positioning with more subtle soft-tissue handling, thus possibly leading into better outcome.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypnotize that, robotic-assisted TKA is superior to manual TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis in respect to functional outcome, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency.
Trial desing: The investigators will conduct a single-center, randomized, controlled, double blinded superiority trial of 24-months to compare robotic-assisted and manual total knee arthroplasty in respect to functional outcome, implant positioning, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency with up to 10 years follow-up for complications.
The principle outcome measure will be patient reported outcome measure (PROM) Oxford knee score (OKS) points (0-48 points) at two years after surgery. Minimal clinically important difference will be considered as 5 points. Other PROMS, patient satisfaction, short-term rehabilitation, implant positioning, knee range of motion, length of sick leave and cost efficiency will also be reported. Patients will be followed up to 10 years for complications (infection, manipulation and revisions).
This study will be conducted in Central Hospital of Satakunta (Satasairaala), Finland. The investigators will recruit 170 adult patients (aged 50-80), with end-stage (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV) primary osteoarhritis. Patients will be randomly assingned to either robotic-assisted or manual TKA. Patients will be blinded by the intervention method used. Personnel and investigators assessing the patients and interpreting the data will also be blinded to the surgical method.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty | Experimental | The intervention group will undergo MAKO assisted RATKA. The patients will have individualized alignment. Knee balance is achieved with bony cuts and implant positioning, to avoid soft tissue releases. A preoperative planning based on computed tomography (CT) scans is made and intraoperatively computer assisted gap balancing is performed based on the plan and patient's soft tissue envelope and native joint line. The precise pre-operative planning, balancing and alignment method has been described by Calliess T el al. |
|
| Manual total knee arthroplasty | Active Comparator | The control group will undergo manual jig-guided TKA, with bony cuts made to achieve neutral mechanical axis, and if necessary, knee balancing will be performed by soft tissue releases. Weight bearing semi-flexion radiographs and long leg radiographs are used for preoperative planning. Intramedullary guiding rod is used in femur to align the cuts in 6 to 7 degrees of valgus. Femoral component rotation is fixed to trans-epicondylar line. Tibia cuts are aligned with either intra- or extramedullary guiding rod according to the preference of the surgeon. Tibia component rotation is fixed to medial one-third of tibial tubercle. After bony cuts, knee balancing is performed with soft-tissue and ligament releases if necessary. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty | Device | In robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with the guidance of the robot according to CT-based plan. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oxford Knee score OKS at 24 months | Patient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 24 month. Scale from 0 (=worst) to 48 (=excellent) points Minimal clinically important difference considered as 5 points. | 24 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oxford Knee Score at 3 and 12 months | Patient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 3 and 12 months. Scale from 0 (=worst) to 48 (=excellent) points. Minimal clinically important difference considered as 5 points. | 3 and 12 months visits |
| Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 3, 12 and 24 months |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juha Kukkonen, dos MD | Contact | +358 45 177 7747 | juha.kukkonen@sata.fi | |
| Aleksi Annaniemi, PhD MD | Contact | +358 505117060 | aleksi.annaniemi@sata.fi |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Silja Voutilainen, MD, PhD | Helsinki University Central Hospital | Study Chair |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Manual total knee arthroplasty | Procedure | In manual total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with jig guides according to whole leg weight bearing x-ray planning. |
|
|
Patient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire KOOS points at 3, 12 and 24 months after the operation. Scale from 0 (=worst) to 100 (=excellent). |
| 3, 12 and 24 months |
| The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 3, 12 and 24 months. | Patient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire WOMAC score at 3, 12 and 24 months after the operation. Scale from 0 (= excellent) to 96 (= worst) points. | 3, 12 and 24 months |
| Patient satisfaction inquiry at 3, 12 and 24 months | Patient satisfaction question asked at 3, 12 and 24 months after the operation: If you could choose again, would you still go for the sugery? 0= no 1 = probably not 2= I don't know 4 = probably yes 5 = yes. | 3, 12 and 24 months |
| Working ability, lenght of the sick leave | Length of the sick leave after the surgery, measured as days. Asked from the patient and checked from the patient files. | up to 24 months |
| Working ability, part-time vs full-time | Asked from the patient at the 3, 12 and 24 months follow-ups visits. Has the operation changed your ability to work full-time or part-time? Options: a) yes my work changed from full-time to part-time after surgery b) no my work is as much full-time or part-time as it was before the surgey c) yes my work changed from full-time to part-time after surgery d) my work as part-time or full-time has changed from other reasons not related to the knee. | Asked at 3 month, 12 months and 24 months after the surgery |
| Working ability, physical demands of the job | Asked from the patient at the 3, 12 and 24 months follow-ups visits. Has the physical demands of your job changed after the operation because of the knee? Options: a) yes the physical demands of my job is now lower than it was before the surgery b) no my work is as physically demanding as it was before the surgery c) yes the physical demands of my job is now higher than it was before the surgery d) the physical demands of my job has changed from other reasons not related to the knee. | Asked at 3 month, 12 months and 24 months after the surgery |
| Life quality questionnaire 15 dimensions (15D) at 3, 12 and 24 months | Life quality questionnaire 15 dimensions at 3 follow up visits. Scale from 15 (=exellent) to 75 (=worst) points. | 3, 12 and 24 months |
| Pain at rest and during walking on visual analoque scale (VAS) | pain at rest and during walking on visual analoque scale (VAS) from 0 (=no pain) to 10 (=extreme pain) | First day after the operation and at 3, 12 and 24 months |
| Opioid usage | Opioid usage mg/day | Up to two weeks |
| Blood loss | Blood loss evaluated by the by measuring pre- and post-operative (first day after surgery) hemoglobin g/L. Difference between the pre-operative and post-operative Hemoglobin (g/L) values. | First day after the operation |
| Lenght of the hospital stay | Length of hospital stay measured in days. | Up to 1 week |
| Operation time | Time of the operation in hours and minutes checked form patient files. | Day of the surgery |
| Post-operative CRP | post-op CRP as a indirect soft-tissue damage measure | First day after the operation |
| Knee swelling | Knee swelling, knee diameter measured above the patella and compared to the unaffected size, the diameter difference in centimeters between the legs. Indirect soft-tissue damage measures | First day after the operation |
| Range of knee motion (ROM) | Range of knee motion measured with goniometry as degrees at the ward on first post-operative day and ant the 3, 12 and 24 months visits. | First day after the operation and at 3, 12 and 24 months visits |
| Radiological outcome measures, alingment | Knee alignment measured from post-operative weight bearing whole leg x-rays as degrees. Measured as the degrees between femoral mechanical axis line and tibial mechanical axis line. | Weight bearing whole leg x-rays taken 3 months post-operatively. |
| Radiological outcome measures, posterior condylar offset | Post-op knee x-ray taken at the first post-operative day; posterior condylar offset, measured as maximal thickness of the posterior condyle projecting posteriorly to a straight line drawn as the extension of the posterior femoral shaft cortex, measured in millimeters | post-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operation |
| Radiological outcome measures, Insall-salvati ratio | Measured from post-operative knee x-rays. Insall-salvati ratio: the length of the patellar tendon in millimeters divided by the length of the patella in millimeters. | post-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operation |
| Radiological outcome measures, Overhanging | Measured from post-operative knee x-rays. Overhanging of the tibial or femoral component from medial lateral, posterior or anterior side measured as millimeters. The length between the bony edge to the edge of the component. | post-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operation |
| Radiological outcome measures, Notching | Measured from post-operative knee x-rays. Notching of the anterior femoral cortex. The lenght in millimeters between the anterior femoral cortex and the anterior edge femoral component in sagittal x-ray. | post-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operation |
| Complications, revisons | Revisions meaning re-operation of the knee due any reason. Checked from the patient files at 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery. Measured as number of revisions | 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years |
| Complications, infections | Infections that recuire antibiotics or revision surgery. Checked from the patient files at 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery. Measured as number of infections | 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery |
| Complications, knee manipulation under anestesia due stiff knee | Need for knee manipulations under anesthesia due stiff knee. Measured as number of manipulations. Checked form the patient files at 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery | 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery. |
| Complications, re-admission | Unplanned post-operative re-admissions due to the knee operation. Measured as days at the ward. | up to 24 months |
| Complications, unplannet emergency unit visits | Unplanned post-operative visits to the hospital emergency unit due to the knee operation, number of visits | up to 24 months |
| Costs | Total cost of the treatment, measured as amount of money. | up to 24 months |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |