Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Delaware State University | UNKNOWN |
| VA New Jersey Health Care System | FED |
| Louis Stokes VA Medical Center | FED |
| South Texas Veterans Health Care System |
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to see if a mobile-delivered mental health program called Toivoa-002, which combines digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with personal coaching, can effectively reduce depression in adults with hearing or mobility disabilities. The study aims to answer whether this dual-intervention digital service is more effective at lowering depression symptoms over an 8-week period than a "sham" digital program that is developed to look similar but does not contain active therapeutic content. The investigators hypothesize that participants who use the Toivoa-002 program will show significantly greater reductions in depression compared to those using the sham program, and that these mental health benefits will last through a 12-week follow-up. Adults within the disability community frequently encounter unique environmental and societal barriers - such as limited physical accessibility, transportation challenges, and workplace inflexibility - that can directly drive or worsen depression. By offering a fully remote and accessible mobile tool, this study seeks to determine if a digital health service can deliver scalable, effective depression relief tailored to the lived experiences of people with disabilities.
This pivotal, two-arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) will assess the efficacy of Toivoa-002, a mobile-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program tailored for people with disabilities, combined with National Board for Health and Wellness Coaching (NBHWC)-certified coaching, in reducing depression symptoms compared to a sham digital program.
Recruitment will focus on adults with hearing or mobility disabilities, chosen to represent the broader U.S. disability community due to shared barriers to social participation, high prevalence of depression, and common co-morbidities. Depression in these populations often stems from environmental and societal barriers, such as limited accessibility, transportation challenges, and workplace inflexibility, rather than the medical condition alone.
Participants will be randomized to either intervention or control group.
The primary endpoint is change in evaluator-administered Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) from baseline to Week 8. Secondary endpoints include durability of effect at Week 12, Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Weeks 8 and 12, and proportion achieving a clinically meaningful response. Exploratory endpoints assess changes in anxiety (HAM-A) and self-reported depression (PHQ-9) at Week 8.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-treatment, end of treatment (Week 8), and follow-up (Week 12). Self-report measures (PHQ-9, GAD-7) will be collected at baseline and biweekly during the intervention.
Recruitment will occur at up to 10 geographically dispersed U.S. sites, including Veterans Affairs healthcare facilities and academic institutions, using outreach through specialty clinics, events, and online platforms. The trial aims to enroll a diverse participant population without restrictions on gender, race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.
The study is designed to generate evidence on the effectiveness and durability of a dual-intervention approach, digital CBT plus coaching, for depression reduction in people with disabilities, with potential implications for scalable, accessible mental health care delivery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toivoa-002 Digital CBT + NBHWC Coaching | Active Comparator | Participants in this arm receive a dual mental health treatment via a secure mobile app, including 8 psychoeducational modules and weekly one-on-one sessions with a National Board for Health & Wellness Coaching (NBHWC)-certified coach. Modules focus on goal-setting, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, and interpersonal skill-building, with interactive exercises and opportunities for reinforcement. While the program is structured for one module per week over 8 consecutive weeks, participants may engage more flexibly in as little as 5-minute increments. ALL INVITED PARTICIPANTS: Following baseline assessments, study participants will be randomized by the site administrator and then invited to join either the Toivoa-002 (therapy) or sham (control) through a meeting invitation. The invitation will include instructions to download and register for the app, and contact information for their coach or assessor. |
|
| General Health Education + Interactive Quizzes | Sham Comparator | Participants randomized to the sham comparator receive an 8-week digital program featuring general health and wellness information with interactive quizzes. This content is not related to depression treatment or CBT techniques. The arm is designed to mirror the Toivoa-001 arm in duration and engagement, ensuring parity in attention without therapeutic intent. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham Digital Program - General health education and interactive quizzes unrelated to depression or CBT. | Device | General health and wellness information with interactive quizzes. This content is not related to depression treatment or CBT techniques. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Evaluator-Administered Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) from Baseline to Week 8. | The analysis of the primary endpoint, i.e., change in HAM-D @ Week 8, will be based on a MMRM (mixed model of repeated measures) in the enrolled population, where site & participant are random effects & assessment (Week 4 versus Week 8) & randomization arm (Toivoa-002 vs Sham) & the assessment-by-arm interaction are fixed effects. Additionally, the baseline assessment will be included as a fixed effect covariate. The model will include up to 2 outcomes per participant (change @ Week 4 & change @ Week 8). The hypothesis of equal mean change will be evaluated based on the t-test corresponding to the difference in least square means at Week 8, where both the point estimate & the variance of the difference in least square means will be estimated using multiple imputation. Details regarding the number of multiple imputation datasets, the method of obtaining a combined point estimate and variance from the MMRM evaluations of the multiple imputation datasets will be pre-specified in the plan | Change in evaluator-administered Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) between baseline and Week 8. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) at Week 12, Clinical Global Impression for Improvement (CGI- I) at Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12, and proportion of participants achieving clinically meaningful response at Week 8 on HAM-D. | (1) Change in Evaluator-administered Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) at Week 12 (4 weeks after completion of Toivoa modules) (2) Evaluator Administered Clinical Global Impression for Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 4 and end of therapy at Week 8. (3) Evaluator Administered Clinical Global Impression for Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 (4 weeks after completion of therapy). (4) Proportion achieving a clinically meaningful HAM-D reduction at Week 8. All secondary endpoints will be evaluated using the enrolled population. The durability of the HAM-D effect will be analyzed with an MMRM that is identical to the model in the primary analysis with the exception that it will include the change at Week 12, such that there are up to 3 observations per participant. The hypothesis will be tested based on the t-test for the difference in least squares means at Week 12 rather than Week 8. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Baseline to Week 8 | 1) Change in Evaluator-administered Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) from baseline to Week 8. (2) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from baseline to Week 8. The analysis of change in anxiety will be evaluated with an MMRM that is identical to the primary analysis, with the exception that the outcome will be change in HAM-A rather than change in HAM-D. Similarly, the analysis of change in PHQ-9 will be evaluated with an MMRM that is identical to the primary analysis, with the exception that the outcome will be change in PHQ-9 rather than change in HAM-D. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Randa | Contact | 612-237-5896 | lranda@toivoa.us |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware State University | Dover | Delaware | 19904 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25273302 | Background | Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;13(3):288-95. doi: 10.1002/wps.20151. | |
| 22163317 | Background | Chen LH, Lee WC. Two-way minimization: a novel treatment allocation method for small trials. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028604. Epub 2011 Dec 7. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| American Psychological Association (2022), Healthcare Practitioner Survey | View source |
Not provided
This study will be conducted in accordance with the following publication and data sharing policies and regulations: Toivoaâ„¢ will share anonymized/de-identified clinical trial data and publish research outcomes in scientific journals, or present data at conferences. Considerations for ensuring confidentiality of these shared data are described in Section 10.1.2 and 10.1.3. We will implement a review process for clinical publications prior to submission for publication in journals or presentation at medical conferences. As Responsible Party, Toivoaâ„¢ will share information about this/these trial(s) via timely registration updates, and results reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov. The informed consent documents used for this/these trial(s) will include statements to inform participants that information about the trial will be posted in ClinicalTrials.gov.
As Responsible Party, Toivoaâ„¢ will make the Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), and Informed Consent Form (ICF) available beginning 6 months following formal FDA clearance of the digital therapeutic and publication of the primary efficacy manuscript, whichever occurs later. These supporting documents will remain available to qualified researchers for a period of 3 years from that start date. The informed consent documents used for this trial include explicit statements informing participants of these data- and document-sharing practices.
Access to individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents is controlled and limited to academic and clinical researchers engaging in independent, non-commercial scientific research. To request access, investigators must submit a formal, methodologically sound research proposal detailing the specific hypotheses and an independent statistical analysis plan (SAP). Requests will be reviewed and evaluated by Toivoa's leadership based on scientific merit, investigator qualifications, and ethical alignment. Approved requests will require the execution of a formal Data Use Agreement (DUA) that explicitly prohibits commercial exploitation, competitive asset weaponization, reverse-engineering of proprietary software or platform telemetry, or participant re-identification. Inquiries and proposals should be submitted directly to lranda@toivoa.us.
Not provided
Not provided
| FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The randomization allocation of UC+Toivoa-002 versus UC+Sham will be done in random blocks of 2, 4, 6, and 8 subjects. As the study progresses, the blocking will be reduced to 2 and 4. This will provide relative balance over the course of the study while minimizing study personnel ability to predict the next randomization assignment. Monthly balance of randomization assignments will be reported, although the randomization assignments will be coded as A versus B to maintain blinding. Each site will randomize independently from other sites & maintain its own randomization schedule.
The study will be conducted as a double-blind study where both the participant & evaluators will not be aware of which study arm they have been assigned. Blinding assignments and onboarding instructions will be generated by the Site Administrator for a particular location. Blinding assignments will be made per site using procedures outside of the Rauha data platform and visible only to the Site Administrator
| Toivoa-002 - A digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy program combined with NBHWC-certified coaching. | Device | A dual mental health treatment consisting of digitally-administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy combined with National Board Health and Wellness Coach (NBHWC) trained Coaches |
|
| Enrollment to 4 weeks after treatment (12 weeks) |
| HAM-A and PHQ-9 Baseline to Week 8 |
| New Jersey Department of Veterans Health | East Orange | New Jersey | 07018 | United States |
|
| Louis Stokes Cleveland VAMC | Cleveland | Ohio | 44016 | United States |
|
| South Texas Veterans Health Care System | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
|
| 15809408 | Background | DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, Young PR, Salomon RM, O'Reardon JP, Lovett ML, Gladis MM, Brown LL, Gallop R. Cognitive therapy vs medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):409-16. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.409. |
| 16881773 | Background | Dimidjian S, Hollon SD, Dobson KS, Schmaling KB, Kohlenberg RJ, Addis ME, Gallop R, McGlinchey JB, Markley DK, Gollan JK, Atkins DC, Dunner DL, Jacobson NS. Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Aug;74(4):658-70. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.658. |
| 20183399 | Background | Gallop R, Tasca GA. Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: II. The complexities. Psychother Res. 2009 Jul;19(4-5):438-52. doi: 10.1080/10503300902849475. |
| 8357299 | Background | Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, Elkin I, Waternaux C, Kraemer HC, Greenhouse JB, Shea MT, Imber SD, Sotsky SM, Watkins JT. Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Application to the NIMH treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;50(9):739-50. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820210073009. |
| 24274626 | Background | Gottfredson NC, Bauer DJ, Baldwin SA, Okiishi JC. Using a shared parameter mixture model to estimate change during treatment when termination is related to recovery speed. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;82(5):813-27. doi: 10.1037/a0034831. Epub 2013 Nov 25. |
| 19739238 | Background | Han B, Enas NH, McEntegart D. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation. Stat Med. 2009 Nov 30;28(27):3329-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3710. |
| 26453453 | Background | Hill KG, Woodward D, Woelfel T, Hawkins JD, Green S. Planning for Long-Term Follow-Up: Strategies Learned from Longitudinal Studies. Prev Sci. 2016 Oct;17(7):806-18. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0610-7. |
| 31441952 | Background | Katz I, Barry CN, Cooper SA, Kasprow WJ, Hoff RA. Use of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in a large sample of Veterans receiving mental health services in the Veterans Health Administration. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Feb;50(1):111-121. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12584. Epub 2019 Aug 23. |
| 11556941 | Background | Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. |
| 2963053 | Background | Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, Heuser I. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Affect Disord. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(88)90072-9. |
| 22193671 | Background | Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, Mann JJ. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704. |
| 9734550 | Background | Reimherr FW, Amsterdam JD, Quitkin FM, Rosenbaum JF, Fava M, Zajecka J, Beasley CM Jr, Michelson D, Roback P, Sundell K. Optimal length of continuation therapy in depression: a prospective assessment during long-term fluoxetine treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;155(9):1247-53. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.9.1247. |
| 34295161 | Background | Rush AJ, South C, Jain S, Agha R, Zhang M, Shrestha S, Khan Z, Hassan M, Trivedi MH. Clinically Significant Changes in the 17- and 6-Item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression: A STAR*D Report. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Jul 14;17:2333-2345. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S305331. eCollection 2021. |
| 18366819 | Background | Scott KM, Von Korff M, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bromet E, Fayyad J, de Girolamo G, Demyttenaere K, Gasquet I, Gureje O, Haro JM, He Y, Kessler RC, Levinson D, Medina Mora ME, Oakley Browne M, Ormel J, Posada-Villa J, Watanabe M, Williams D. Mental-physical co-morbidity and its relationship with disability: results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med. 2009 Jan;39(1):33-43. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003188. Epub 2008 Mar 26. |
| 31995132 | Background | Segal ZV, Dimidjian S, Beck A, Boggs JM, Vanderkruik R, Metcalf CA, Gallop R, Felder JN, Levy J. Outcomes of Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Patients With Residual Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):563-573. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4693. |
| 16717171 | Background | Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. |
| 9544529 | Background | Ten Have TR, Kunselman AR, Pulkstenis EP, Landis JR. Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out. Biometrics. 1998 Mar;54(1):367-83. |
| 8500309 | Background | Therneau TM. How many stratification factors are "too many" to use in a randomization plan? Control Clin Trials. 1993 Apr;14(2):98-108. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(93)90013-4. |
| 3395203 | Background | Williams JB. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):742-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007. |
| 11137194 | Background | Ahn C, Overall JE, Tonidandel S. Sample size and power calculations in repeated measurement analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2001 Feb;64(2):121-124. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2607(00)00095-x. |
| 29451967 | Result | Carpenter JK, Andrews LA, Witcraft SM, Powers MB, Smits JAJ, Hofmann SG. Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jun;35(6):502-514. doi: 10.1002/da.22728. Epub 2018 Feb 16. |
| 32914770 | Result | Cree RA, Okoro CA, Zack MM, Carbone E. Frequent Mental Distress Among Adults, by Disability Status, Disability Type, and Selected Characteristics - United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1238-1243. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a2. |
| 30994877 | Result | Cuijpers P, Noma H, Karyotaki E, Cipriani A, Furukawa TA. Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):700-707. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0268. |
| 36129711 | Result | Fan JQ, Lu WJ, Tan WQ, Liu X, Wang YT, Wang NB, Zhuang LX. Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Anxiety Among Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232133. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32133. |
| 14399272 | Result | HAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. No abstract available. |
| 33471111 | Result | Karyotaki E, Efthimiou O, Miguel C, Bermpohl FMG, Furukawa TA, Cuijpers P; Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses for Depression (IPDMA-DE) Collaboration; Riper H, Patel V, Mira A, Gemmil AW, Yeung AS, Lange A, Williams AD, Mackinnon A, Geraedts A, van Straten A, Meyer B, Bjorkelund C, Knaevelsrud C, Beevers CG, Botella C, Strunk DR, Mohr DC, Ebert DD, Kessler D, Richards D, Littlewood E, Forsell E, Feng F, Wang F, Andersson G, Hadjistavropoulos H, Christensen H, Ezawa ID, Choi I, Rosso IM, Klein JP, Shumake J, Garcia-Campayo J, Milgrom J, Smith J, Montero-Marin J, Newby JM, Breton-Lopez J, Schneider J, Vernmark K, Bucker L, Sheeber LB, Warmerdam L, Farrer L, Heinrich M, Huibers MJH, Kivi M, Kraepelien M, Forand NR, Pugh N, Lindefors N, Lintvedt O, Zagorscak P, Carlbring P, Phillips R, Johansson R, Kessler RC, Brabyn S, Perini S, Rauch SL, Gilbody S, Moritz S, Berger T, Pop V, Kaldo V, Spek V, Forsell Y. Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):361-371. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4364. |
| 37164067 | Result | Kavelaars R, Ward H, Mackie DS, Modi KM, Mohandas A. The burden of anxiety among a nationally representative US adult population. J Affect Disord. 2023 Sep 1;336:81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.069. Epub 2023 May 8. |
| 31646432 | Result | Konnopka A, Konig H. Economic Burden of Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jan;38(1):25-37. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00849-7. |
| 32775969 | Result | Luo C, Sanger N, Singhal N, Pattrick K, Shams I, Shahid H, Hoang P, Schmidt J, Lee J, Haber S, Puckering M, Buchanan N, Lee P, Ng K, Sun S, Kheyson S, Chung DC, Sanger S, Thabane L, Samaan Z. A comparison of electronically-delivered and face to face cognitive behavioural therapies in depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 27;24:100442. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100442. eCollection 2020 Jul. |
| 27060430 | Result | Newby JM, Twomey C, Yuan Li SS, Andrews G. Transdiagnostic computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016 Jul 15;199:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Mar 24. |
| 34047264 | Result | Pauley D, Cuijpers P, Papola D, Miguel C, Karyotaki E. Two decades of digital interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness. Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(2):567-579. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001999. Epub 2021 May 28. |
| 31753256 | Result | Zhao G, Okoro CA, Hsia J, Garvin WS, Town M. Prevalence of Disability and Disability Types by Urban-Rural County Classification-U.S., 2016. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):749-756. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.022. |
| Driessen E, \& Hollon SD. (2010). Cognitive behavioral therapy for mood disorders: Efficacy, moderators and mediators. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 33(3), 537-55. | View source |
| Guy W: Clinical Global Impression. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, revised National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD. (1976) | View source |
| Hedeker, D. \& Gibbons, R.D. (2006). Longitudinal data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. | View source |
| Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., \& Chicken, E. (2013). Nonparametric statistical methods (3rd ed., pp. xiii, 819 pages). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. | View source |
| Pasquini, G and Keeter, S. (2022) At least four in ten U.S. adults have faced high levels of psychological distress during COVID-19 pandemic. Pew Research Center Reports December 12, 2022 | View source |
| Van Buuren, S., and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn (2011), mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1-67. | View source |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided