Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-A01531-48 | Other Identifier | IDRCB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer therapy, providing unprecedented responses in a wide range of malignancies. However, they induced various immune-related adverse events (iRAE) that can be life-threatening. About 20% of patients treated with an ICI monotherapy, and up to 60% of patients treated with a combination of ICIs, experienced a severe iRAE. Most side effects are reversible if managed early, but can affect survival and quality of life, leading to treatment interruptions or hospitalization. Some of these irAEs, particularly those affecting hormonal functions, may be irreversible and persist even after treatment discontinuation.
The development of predictive biomarkers of such toxicities is an unmet medical need. The variety of mechanisms involved in iRAE, and the lack of effective animal models, could probably explain why the topic remains largely unexplored. To date, some biomarkers predictive of the occurrence of iRAE, irrespective of the type of organ affected, have been identified by state-of-the-art techniques on small cohorts prior to treatment initiation, but none is individually robust enough to be used in daily practice.
We hypothesize that a signature derived from the integrative analysis of various biological parameters (immunomonitoring, auto-immunity features, viral monitoring, microbiota monitoring, fragmentome analysis, pharmacokinetics, radiomics and genetics), available in routine hospital practice, could answer this question, and thus enable the development of specific prevention strategies
The objectives are :
Primary objective:
Identify a baseline predictive signature for severe iRAE, irrespective of the type of organ affected.
Secondary objectives:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood, Throat and skin swabs and Stool additional samples | Experimental | Blood, Throat and skin swabs and Stool additional samples are collected in parallel of treatment administration throughout visits 1 to 4. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloodsampling | Other | Blood will be sampled At Visit 1, 2, 3 and 4. For patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs), an additionnal visit V tox will be planned will a blood sampling. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Identification of a predictive baseline signature who maximize the rate of prediction of severe iRAE | The primary endpoint is the identification of a predictive baseline signature who maximize the rate of prediction of severe iRAE among patients who had a severe iRAE (iRAE + patients) and minimize the rate of prediction of severe iRAE among patients who had not a severe iRAE (iRAE- patients), we choose a minimum of 70% of prediction in iRAE + population and a maximum of 15% of prediction in iRAE- population. | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assesment of safety according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0 criteria | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months | |
| Identification of signatures for severe iRAEs | Predictive performance of baseline + T1 signatures for severe iRAEs |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausicaa Malissen, dr | Contact | 0491435817 | 33 | promotion.interne@ap-hm.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de marseille | Marseille | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Pharyngeal swab sampling | Other | Pharyngeal swab will be sampled at visit 4 for patients without immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs) Pharyngeal swab will be sampled at visit Tox for patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs) |
|
| Cuteanous swab sampling | Other | Cuteanous swab will be sampled at visit 1, 2, 3 and 4 for patients without immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs). Cuteanous swab will be sampled at visit 1, 2, 3 and tox for patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs). |
|
| Stools sample collection | Other | Stools sample will be collected at visit 1, 2, 3 and 4 for patients without immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs). Stools sample will be collected at visit 1, 2, 3 and tox for patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs). |
|
| From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Identification of signatures for organ-specific severe iRAEs | Predictive performance of baseline signatures for organ-specific severe iRAEs using the same performance thresholds. | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Identification of signatures for organ-specific severe iRAEs at baseline and T1 | Predictive performance of baseline + T1 signatures for organ-specific severe iRAEs. | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Identification of signatures for severe iRAEs in patients receiving anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy. | Performance of baseline signatures for severe iRAEs in patients receiving anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy. | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Identification of signatures in patients receiving combination immunotherapy | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Identification of baseline signatures for each specific immunotherapy class. | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Comparison of predictive signatures between responders and non-responders (RECIST 1.1). | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Rate of biological parameter variation between severe and non-severe iRAE patients | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Assessment of PRO-CTCAE | NCI-PRO-CTCAE (Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events): which is a 81-item instruments designed to measure symptoms and side effects for patients through treatment for their cancer. Items are constructed on a 5-point Likert scale with the following response options: 1 "Not at all" / 2 "A little" / 3 "Quite a bit" / 4 "severe" / 5 "Extremely severe". | From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months |
| Evaluation of quality of life via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire | EORTC QLQ-C30 : European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, which is a 30-item instrument designed to measure quality of life in all cancer patients. 28 items are constructed on a 4-point Likert scale with the following response options: 1 "Not at all" / 2 "A little" / 3 "Quite a bit" / 4 "A lot." The last two items are constructed on a 7-point response scale. These two items assess the patient's physical condition and overall quality of life, respectively, with response 1 corresponding to a "very poor" condition and response 7 to an "excellent". | From enrollement to the end of following after 12 months |
| Evaluation of quality of life via EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | EQ-5D-5L, which is descriptive system EuroQol comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Scale frome 1 to 100, where 0 is the worst possible condition and 100 is the best. | From enrollement to end of the following after 12 months |