Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of firsekibart versus anakinra in patients with AOSD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firsekibart group |
| ||
| Anakinra group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firsekibart | Biological | Firsekibart will be administered according to the protocol |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The proportion of subjects achieving clinical inactive disease (CID) at Week 24, where CID is defined as the absence of Still's disease-related symptoms with normal ESR or CRP levels. | At Week 24 from initiation of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥50% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range at Weeks 2, 4, and 8. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 2, 4, and 8 after treatment initiation |
| Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range at Week 12. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study participants will be patients with active Adult-Onset Still's Disease recruited from Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengde Yang | Contact | 13501717833 | yangchengde@sina.com | |
| Qiongyi Hu | Contact | 18317071395 | hugiongyi131@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine | Recruiting | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200025 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053590 | Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016207 | Cytokines |
| D036341 | Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Anakinra |
| Biological |
Anakinra will be administered according to the protocol |
|
Efficacy Endpoints |
| At Week 12 after treatment initiation |
| Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range, and glucocorticoid dose ≤0.2 mg/kg/day at Week 12. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Week 12 after treatment initiation |
| Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range, and glucocorticoid dose ≤0.1 mg/kg/day at Week 12. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Week 12 after treatment initiation |
| Proportion of subjects achieving clinical inactive disease (CID) with discontinuation of glucocorticoids | Efficacy Endpoints | At Week 24 after treatment initiation |
| Proportion of subjects without disease relapse at Weeks 12 and 24. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 12 and 24 after treatment initiation |
| ACR30, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation |
| Change from baseline in ferritin levels at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation |
| Change from baseline in cytokine levels (including sIL-2R) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation |
| Change from baseline in ESR at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation |
| Change from baseline in CRP levels at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation |
| Change from baseline in Pouchot score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. | Efficacy Endpoints. Pouchot score ranges from 0 to 12 points, with higher scores indicating a poorer outcome. | At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation |
| Change from baseline in glucocorticoid dose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. | Efficacy Endpoints | At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation |
| Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0 | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |