Efficacy of Liberal Versus Restricted IV Fluid Approach in the Management of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Crisis

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT07188766

Lead Sponsor

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityOTHER

Overall Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

Not Applicable

Enrollment

394Estimated

Last Update Posted

Mar 18, 2026Actual

Start Date

Oct 5, 2025Actual

Primary Completion Date

Aug 2028Estimated

Completion Date

Oct 2028Estimated

Official Title

Fluid Management in Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis: Restrictive Versus Liberal Strategies: A Randomized Controlled Trial (FLASC Trial)

Brief Summary

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a prevalent inherited blood disorder characterized by vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), which lead to severe pain and complications. Despite hydration being a cornerstone of VOC management, the optimal fluid strategy remains uncertain. This study evaluates restrictive versus liberal fluid management strategies in patients with acute VOC.

This multi-center, open-label, non-inferiority RCT will enroll patients with SCD presenting with acute VOC. Participants will be randomized to either a restrictive or liberal intravenous fluid management protocol. Primary outcome is pain score reduction. Secondary outcomes include time to pain resolution, ED length of stay, hospital admission rate, cumulative opioid dose, adverse events (incidence of fluid overload, pulmonary congestion), acute chest syndrome, incidence of acute kidney injury, revisit rates within 72 hours of ED discharge, need for intensive care or high-dependency unit admission, need for additional interventions, and 28 days overall mortality. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principles.

We hypothesize that a restrictive fluid strategy will achieve non-inferior pain control compared to a liberal strategy, while minimizing fluid-related complications. This study will provide evidence to inform clinical guidelines for fluid management in SCD patients experiencing VOCs.

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, non-inferiority, open-label, multicenter randomized-controlled trial (RCT) conducted in the emergency departments (EDs) of tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The primary objective is to compare two fluid management strategies- restrictive (intervention) vs. liberal (control) in adult sickle cell disease (SCD) patients hospitalized for VOC. The study evaluates whether a restrictive fluid approach is non-inferior to a liberal strategy in terms of pain resolution, hospitalization duration, and other clinical outcomes.

Patients will be randomized upon ED admission, and their assigned fluid regimen will be administered within the first hour. Clinical teams will monitor outcomes throughout hospitalization or up to 28 days post-enrollment.

Study Population

1. Recruitment Screening: All patients admitted to the ED with VOC will be screened for eligibility.

   Consent Model: A priori informed written consent will be obtained from conscious, coherent patients or substitute decision-makers.

2. Inclusion Criteria Age >18 years with confirmed SCD diagnosis.

   Presenting with VOC requiring hospitalization.

   Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) >5

   Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

3. Exclusion Criteria Requiring specialized IVF management per the physician's discretion.

Cardiac/Renal Conditions:

Congestive heart failure (CHF) or symptomatic systolic heart failure.

Patients with ESRD on chronic dialysis.

Hemodynamic Instability:

Shock (SBP <100 mmHg or MAP <65) with hypoperfusion signs.

Other Exclusions:

Known/suspected pregnancy.

Prior enrollment in this trial within the last 30 days.

Concurrent enrollment in another trial affecting fluid management.

Inability to obtain IV access.

Trial Intervention

1. Screening & Randomization Screening occurs upon ED admission; evaluations must precede randomization.

   A screening log will track eligible vs. randomized patients.

2. Informed Consent An a priori consent model is used due to the conscious-coherent state of most SCD patients in VOC.

   Efforts will be made to obtain consent immediately from the patient or surrogate.

3. Intervention Arms A. Intervention (Restrictive)Keep-vein-open (KVO) rate only (minimal fluids to maintain IV patency). No additional IV fluids administered.

B. Control (Liberal) 20 mL/kg IV bolus (NS or LR over 1 hour) + maintenance fluids (1.5-2 mL/kg/day).

Initiation: Both regimens starts within 1 hour of ED admission and continue until ED discharge.

Hospitalized Patients:

Pain scores (NPRS) recorded at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Total fluid intake documented at hospital discharge.

• SCD
• Vaso Occlussive Crisis

• Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

Ages Eligible for Study

Adult (18-64)

Sexes Eligible for Study

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients >18 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of SCD.
2. Presenting with a VOC.
3. NPRS >5
4. Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patient requiring specialized IVF management as per the treating physician discretion.
2. Patients with congestive heart failure, and /or acute or chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure
3. Patients with ESRD on chronic dialysis
4. Patients with signs of shock (low SBP <100 or MAP < 65) and signs of hypo perfusion
5. Known or suspected pregnancy
6. Previously enrolled in this trial within the last 30 days
7. Enrolled in another trial study that interfered with fluid management
8. Unable to obtain IV access.

Primary Purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional Model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open Label)

Lead Sponsor

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityOTHER

hassan.m.alshaqaq@gmail.com966544509443

• Lidocaine Intravenous in the Emergency Department For Sickle Cell Crisis

  NCT04614610

  Unknown statusInterventionalPhase 2Updated Aug 29, 2023
• Lidocaine for Opioid Sparing in Vaso-occlusive Crisis of Sickle Cell Disease

  NCT07274254

  RecruitingInterventionalPhase 3Updated Sep 9, 2026
• Treatment of Sickle Cell Patients Hospitalized in Pain Crisis With Prophylactic Dose Low-molecular-weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Placebo

  NCT01419977

  CompletedInterventionalPhase 2Updated Feb 16, 2015
• The Use of Warmed Saline in Vaso-occlusive Episodes

  NCT02316366

  CompletedInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Oct 31, 2018
• Different Treatment Modalities in the Management of the Painful Crisis in Pediatric Sickle- Cell Anemia

  NCT04301336

  CompletedInterventionalPhase 2Phase 3Updated Jan 27, 2021
• A Study of Intravenous L-Citrulline in Patients Aged 6-21 Years Old With Sickle Cell Disease Presenting to Emergency Departments in Acute Vaso-Occlusive Crisis

  NCT06989567

  Not yet recruitingInterventionalPhase 3Updated May 29, 2025