Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial aims at testing a new intensive, personalized functional targeting, transcranial magnetic stimulation technique for elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) suffering from a current treatment resistant depressive episode to at least one antidepressant, and suffering from significant secondary cognitive impairment.
The intervention will be based on an accelerated neuromodulation technique using intermittent theta bursts (aiTBS) guided by a personalised funcitonal target within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), using the SAINT® technology, which was recently cleared by the FDA.
Depression in older adults is often associated with cognitive impairment. Executive dysfunction exposes patients to poor response to antidepressants, increased risk of relapse and suicide, and greater disability. Depression doubles the risk of developing dementia in later life.
Late-onset depression is considered more difficult to treat due to low tolerance to standard antidepressant treatments, which prevents dose optimisation. Late-onset depression is considered more difficult to treat due to poor tolerance to standard antidepressant treatments, which prevents dose optimisation.
Furthermore, antidepressants are not optimal for improving cognitive function. Thus, antidepressant therapies are limited in terms of efficacy or tolerance, leading to persistent depressive symptoms and cognitive deficits that impact daily functioning, quality of life, and even independence.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation, a focused non-pharmacological antidepressant therapy, is a promising alternative. Several meta-analyses have demonstrated its efficacy as an antidepressant treatment and its potential for treating mild cognitive impairment. However, these studies have encountered certain limitations, such as small sample sizes and heterogeneity. Recently, a randomised controlled trial testing an accelerated form of intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) in adults with treatment-resistant depression demonstrated a high remission rate of approximately 80% (with effect sizes ranging from [1.4-1.8]). This technique has a good tolerance profile.
Overall, aiTBS treatment has several potentially beneficial aspects for depression in older adults: efficacy, rapid onset of action, and good tolerability. Such a technique could prevent the negative impact of depression and cognitive impairment on the quality of life and independence of older adults with depression.
In this randomised controlled trial (RCT), the investigators aim to test the efficacy of aiTBS treatment guided by functional connectivity at rest in elderly patients suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) in a major depressive episode (MDE) and cognitive impairment. The investigators hypothesise that active aiTBS treatment will be superior to placebo aiTBS treatment in improving depressive and cognitive symptoms.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional Group | Experimental | active transcranial magnetic stimulation using accelerated (aiTBS) |
|
| Control group | Placebo Comparator | Placebo transcranial magnetic stimulation (Sham stimulation) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| transcranial magnetic stimulation by accelerated & high-dose theta-burst, functional imaging guided, i | Other | Participants will then be treated with 1,800 pulses of iTBS (3-pulse 50-Hz bursts at 5-Hz for 2-second trains, with trains every 10 seconds) per session at 90% resting motor threshold and depth-adjustment to the personalized functional target. Each session will last 10 min followed by a 50-minute intersession interval. Ten sessions will be applied per day (18,000 pulses/day) for 5 consecutive days (90,000 total pulses). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation, on depressive symptoms at one-month visit (35+/-3 days after the last day of treatment). | Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (min:0 / max:60) | at one-month visit (35+/-3 days after the last day of treatment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on depressive symptoms at two-month post-intervention | Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (min:0 / max:60) | at two-month post-intervention (F+65D (+/-3D) after the last day of treatment). |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on depressive symptoms at immediate post visit | Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (min:0 / max:60) | at immediate post visit (3 or 4 Day after the last day of treatment) |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on factors associated with treatment resistance at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention in depression and suicide risk - such as anhedonia |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Marie BATAIL, M.D.,Ph.D. | Contact | 0299333937 | jm.batail@ch-guillaumeregnier.fr | |
| Kristell COAT | Contact | 0299282555 | kristell.coat@chu-rennes.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jean-Marie BATAIL, M.D.,Ph.D. | C. H. GUILLAUME REGNIER RENNES | Principal Investigator |
| Bruno MILLET, PH-PD | APHP- LA PITIE | Principal Investigator |
| Ghina HARIKA GERMANEAU, MD |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Triple (participant, operator, investigator) Randomisation code sent to the administrator administering the treatment. Cool 865 Active/Placebo coil
|
Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (min:0 / max:60) |
| at six-month post-intervention (F+180D(+/-6D) after the last day of treatment) |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation | MATTIS (global cognitive functioning) score | at one month post-intervention (+35D (+/-3D) after the last day of treatment). |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation | MATTIS (global cognitive functioning) score | at two-month post-intervention (F+65D (+/-3D) after the last day of treatment) |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on global cognitive functioning, at six-month post-intervention visit. | MATTIS (global cognitive functioning) score | at six-month post-intervention(F+180D(+/-6D) after the last day of treatment) |
SHAPS - clinician rated (anhedonia scale) score (min:0 / max:14) |
| at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on factors associated with treatment resistance at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention in mental pain, loneliness | Visual Analogic Scale for Mental Pain (VAS-MP) (min: 0 =smallest possible - max:10 = largest possible) | at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on factors associated with treatment resistance at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention in oneliness | BHS (hopelessness) (min:0 / max:20) | at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on quality of life | SF - 36 (quality of life) | at two-month, and six-month post-intervention visit |
| To determine the effect of aiTBS, as compared to sham stimulation on autonomy at two-month, and six-month post-intervention visit | Independent Living Scale (ILS) (Tremblay et al., 2021) (min:0 / max:140) | at two-month, and six-month post-intervention visit |
| To determine the moderating effect of treatment resistance severity on the antidepressant effect of aiTBS at two-month post visit. | The treatment severity will be measured by the Maudsley Staging Model (min =0 ; max =15) | at two-month post visit. |
| To monitor any medication change that may occur during the follow-up period (at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention). | Medication change (yes/no) | at immediate, one-month, two-month, and six-month post-intervention) |
| Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit |
| Principal Investigator |
| Maud ROTHARMEL, MD | CHS DU ROUVRAY SOTTEVILLE-LES-ROUEN | Principal Investigator |
| Samuel BULTEAU, MD | Nantes University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Noomane BOUAZIZ, MD | EPS VILLE EVRARD | Principal Investigator |
| Moussa CHALAH, MD | GHU PARIS | Principal Investigator |
| David SZEKELY, MD | Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace | Principal Investigator |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061218 | Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided