Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Treatment-Resistant Psychotic Forensic Patients: A Comparative Study

Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Treatment-Resistant Psychotic Patients in a Forensic Psychiatric Setting: A Comparative Study

This study employs a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the effectiveness of a 6-month multidisciplinary rehabilitation program integrating psychodynamic group therapy, art therapy, music therapy, and cognitive stimulation compared to standard rehabilitation (physiotherapy and occupational therapy). It will be done between a group of a total of 20 patients are divided into an intervention group and a control group from the forensic psychiatric department in Al Masarra Hospital.

Forensic psychiatric patients with treatment-resistant psychotic symptoms often experience persistent cognitive, functional, and social deficits, posing significant challenges to rehabilitation. Traditional approaches may not adequately address these complex needs, highlighting the importance of innovative, multidisciplinary interventions. This study employs a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the effectiveness of a 6-month multidisciplinary rehabilitation program integrating psychodynamic group therapy, art therapy, music therapy, and cognitive stimulation compared to standard rehabilitation (physiotherapy and occupational therapy). A total of 20 patients are divided into an intervention group (n=10) and a control group (n=10) using convenience sampling from the forensic psychiatric department in Al Masarra Hospital. Data is collected using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to assess psychotic symptoms and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to evaluate cognitive function, administered at baseline and post-intervention. Data is analyzed using descriptive statistics (median, interquartile range) and non-parametric tests, including the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for within-group comparisons and the Mann-Whitney U Test for between-group comparisons. Effect sizes are calculated using Cliff's Delta to assess the practical significance of the findings. The null hypothesis states that there will be no significant difference in PANSS and MoCA scores between the intervention and control groups post-intervention. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the findings will provide evidence for integrating creative and psychotherapeutic interventions into forensic psychiatric rehabilitation, offering a scalable model for similar settings.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Diagnosis of chronic psychotic disorder (e.g., schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder) confirmed by psychiatric assessment and medical records.
2. Presence of residual psychotic symptoms (positive symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions; and/or negative symptoms such as blunted affect, social withdrawal) despite ongoing psychotropic treatment.
3. Medically stable and deemed suitable for participation by the treating psychiatrist or healthcare team.
4. Patients who provide informed consent to participate in the rehabilitation program and research study.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Acute medical or psychiatric conditions requiring immediate intervention.
2. Developmental or intellectual disabilities that significantly impair participation in the rehabilitation program or assessments.
3. Current substance dependence that would interfere with participation.
4. Significant risk of harm to self or others, based on clinical assessment or history of violence/aggression.
5. Contraindications to specific rehabilitation program components (e.g., physical exercise, group activities) as determined by medical evaluation.
6. Inability to comprehend study requirements or provide informed consent due to language barriers, cognitive impairment, or other factors.