Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Health Institutes of Türkiye | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This observational study evaluates cervical proprioception using a computer vision-based system developed with OpenCV and MediaPipe. Healthy adults will perform a series of head movements while their nose tip is tracked by a camera. The primary objective is to assess the accuracy of neck position and movement perception. Data will be analyzed to determine the reliability of the tracking system. The study is non-invasive, involves no interventions, and poses minimal risk to participants. Findings may support the development of accessible diagnostic tools for clinical and research applications.
This study aims to assess the test-retest reliability of computer-based cervical proprioception evaluations in healthy adults using OpenCV and MediaPipe for motion tracking. Participants will be seated in a controlled environment with a computer screen at eye level. The following four evaluations will be conducted:
Cervical Joint Position Sense (Head Relocation Error): Participants attempt to reposition their head to a perceived neutral position after flexion, extension, and rotation movements. The software records the deviation in pixels between actual and perceived head positions. Six trials per movement direction will be performed, with retesting after one hour.
Cervical Movement Sense - Patterned Tracking: Participants trace on-screen shapes (e.g., F8, ZZ) with their nose tip to evaluate movement accuracy. The total deviation from the ideal path in pixels will be measured. One practice trial and recorded attempts will be conducted, with retesting after one hour.
Cervical Movement Sense - Target Tracking: Participants follow a moving on-screen target with their nose tip. Tracking accuracy and time spent inside the target will be recorded. Three trials will be performed, with retesting after one week.
Sensorimotor Control Assessment: Participants align their head with randomly appearing visual targets for one minute. Performance will be evaluated based on the number of correct alignments and response accuracy. Three trials will be conducted, with retesting after one hour.
All data will be anonymized and analyzed for reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC). This non-invasive, computer-based methodology aims to provide a reliable and low-cost approach to assessing cervical joint position sense, movement perception, and sensorimotor control, contributing to future clinical and research applications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Volunteer Cohort | A single cohort of 74 healthy adult volunteers will undergo an observational test-retest reliability study of four cervical proprioception assessments using computer-vision tracking. No medical interventions will be administered. Two distinct assessment protocols control for learning effects and follow literature-based retest intervals: Protocol A (n=37): Cervical Movement Sense Target Tracking at baseline and again after one week to assess longer-term reliability. Protocol B (n=37): Head Relocation Test in 32 participants at baseline and again after one hour. Cervical Movement Sense Patterned Tracking and Cervical Proprioceptive Function Test in all 37 participants at baseline and again after one hour to minimize short-term learning effects. Separate participant groups prevent cross-test learning, and retest intervals (1 hour vs. 1 week) align with prior studies. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Joint Position Sense (Head Relocation Error) | With the help of algorithms, the initial position of the participant's nose tip on the screen will be recorded. Following flexion, extension, or rotation movements, the final position will be obtained, and the difference between the initial and final positions will be calculated in pixels and reported as the error score. While the primary output will be in pixels, this difference can also be expressed in degrees with the necessary conversions. Rotational movements performed during the measurement will be simultaneously recorded using the CROM device, and the values from the screen will be compared with those from the CROM to assess criterion validity, which provides the error magnitude directly in degrees. Measurements performed on the same group at two different time points will be analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman methods. | The test will be repeated at 1-hour intervals. |
| Cervical Movement Sense - Patterned Tracking | During the test, an F8 or ZZ shaped pattern will be displayed on the screen, and the participant will trace the pattern starting from the center using their nose tip. The algorithm will track the nose tip's position in each camera frame throughout the test: if the nose tip remains within the shape, the error score will be 0; if it moves outside, the distance to the nearest point of the shape will be calculated in pixels and recorded as the instantaneous error score. At the end of the test, all instantaneous error scores will be summed to obtain the total error score. The start and finish times of the test will also be recorded to determine the total test duration. Total error scores from measurements performed on the same group at different time points will be analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman methods. | The test will be repeated at 1-hour intervals. |
| Cervical Movement Sense - Target Tracking: | During the test, a rectangle will appear on the screen and move at a constant speed along the ZZ or F8 paths. The participant will attempt to keep their nose tip inside this moving rectangle. Since the speed is fixed, the test duration is the same for all participants. Scoring Methods Time-Based Score: The total time the nose tip remains inside the rectangle is divided by the total test duration. The resulting ratio ranges from 0 to 1: 1 → Best score (nose tip always inside) 0 → Worst score (nose tip never inside) Distance-Based Score: For each frame, the algorithm calculates the distance from the nose tip to the rectangle: Inside = 0 Outside = distance in pixels to the nearest edge At the end, all distances are summed to obtain the total deviation score. Both scores from measurements performed on the same group at different time points will be analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman methods. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will consist of healthy adult volunteers aged 18 years and older, without any history of neck pain, spinal disorders, or other conditions affecting cervical mobility. Participants will be recruited from the general population.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mustafa GÜVEN, Master of Science | Contact | 0 384 471 45 75 | 31002 | mguven1389@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| ismail Saraçoğlu, Associate Professor | Kütahya University of Health Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University | Nevşehir | Kozakli | 50600 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22764084 | Background | Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3972-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.5466. Epub 2012 Jul 4. | |
| 38320802 | Background | Mondal D, Vanbelle S, Cassese A, Candel MJ. Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model. Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):532-553. doi: 10.1177/09622802231224657. Epub 2024 Feb 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| The test will be repeated at 1-week intervals. |
| Sensorimotor Control Assessment | The test duration is 60 seconds. During this time, individual points will appear on the screen at random locations. The participant's task is to move their nose tip over these points. When the nose tip correctly reaches a point: The point will disappear, A new point will appear at a different location on the screen. At the end of the test, the number of points the participant successfully matched with their nose tip within the 60 seconds will be counted, and this value will be recorded as the test score. The test score obtained from measurements performed on the same group at different time points will be analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman methods. | The test will be repeated at 1-hour intervals. |
| 27161883 | Background | Basteris A, Pedler A, Sterling M. Evaluating the neck joint position sense error with a standard computer and a webcam. Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:231-234. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 23. |
| 33464539 | Background | Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):143-164. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00230-z. Epub 2021 Jan 12. |
| 19404177 | Background | Sarig-Bahat H, Weiss PL, Laufer Y. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 1;34(10):1018-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819b3254. |
| 18821444 | Background | Pinsault N, Fleury A, Virone G, Bouvier B, Vaillant J, Vuillerme N. Test-retest reliability of cervicocephalic relocation test to neutral head position. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008 Sep-Oct;24(5):380-91. doi: 10.1080/09593980701884824. |
| 16311191 | Background | Strimpakos N, Sakellari V, Gioftsos G, Kapreli E, Oldham J. Cervical joint position sense: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study. Gait Posture. 2006 Jan;23(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.019. |
| 30290759 | Background | Werner IM, Ernst MJ, Treleaven J, Crawford RJ. Intra and interrater reliability and clinical feasibility of a simple measure of cervical movement sense in patients with neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 5;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2287-0. |
| 20975484 | Background | Kristjansson E, Oddsdottir GL. "The Fly": a new clinical assessment and treatment method for deficits of movement control in the cervical spine: reliability and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):E1298-305. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e7fc0a. |
| 15031839 | Background | Kristjansson E, Hardardottir L, Asmundardottir M, Gudmundsson K. A new clinical test for cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility: "the fly". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):490-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00619-1. |
| 19783494 | Background | Hage R, Ancenay E. Identification of a relationship between cervical spine function and rotational movement control. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;52(9):653-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Sep 10. English, French. |
| 31376618 | Background | Goncalves C, Silva AG. Reliability, measurement error and construct validity of four proprioceptive tests in patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Oct;43:103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 28. |
| 36270904 | Background | English DJ, Zacharias A, Green RA, Weerakkody N. Reliability of Cervicocephalic Proprioception Assessment: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022 Jun;45(5):346-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Oct 19. |
| 26831536 | Background | Sarig Bahat H, Sprecher E, Sela I, Treleaven J. Neck motion kinematics: an inter-tester reliability study using an interactive neck VR assessment in asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2139-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4388-5. Epub 2016 Jan 30. |