Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Feasibility study
As robotic surgery advances, the emergence of new platforms such as the Hugoâ„¢ Robotic-Assisted Surgery System calls for robust training frameworks. Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP) provides a structured method to ensure skill acquisition through clearly defined, measurable benchmarks. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing a PBP curriculum to train urologists in nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Hugoâ„¢ system.
Twelve urologists and urology residents will participate, divided into three groups based on experience:
Robotic-naïve Intermediate (Da Vinci experience only) Expert RARP surgeons (Da Vinci experience without prior Hugo exposure)
The PBP training pathway comprises:
Cognitive modules (e-learning with MCQ validation) Psychomotor skills training (device familiarization and basic surgical skills) Procedural training (nerve-sparing RARP on porcine models)
Performance will be evaluated both in real time and via blinded video review.
Primary endpoints include the time to reach proficiency in basic skills and procedural steps, analyzed by prior experience. Secondary endpoints encompass error profiles, participant and instructor feedback, and the feasibility of standardizing proficiency metrics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Robotic-naive participants | urology residents | ||
| Group 2: Intermediate participants | Urologists or urology residents with generic robotic experience using the Intuitive platform, but no exposure to the Hugo system | ||
| Group 3: Experienced participants | Experienced robotic consultants in RARP using the Intuitive platform, but no prior experience with the Hugo system. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| time-to-proficiency for basic skills and procedural steps |
| 9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Error patterns and feasibility of PBP RARP training on the Hugo system | Identification of challenging steps/phases in the PBP RARP procedure based on: Number of errors committed Feedback from trainers Participant feedback on the training process (structured questionnaire) | 9 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior experience with the Hugo robotic system. Participants unable to attend all training days. Non-urology residents or consultants
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
urology residents and urologists
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Van Herzeele, Professor | Orsi Academy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orsi Academy | Melle | 9090 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided