Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R21HD118383 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Northwestern University | OTHER |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
| Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this research study is to examine the effect of a brain stimulation training to improve the function of brain-spinal cord- muscle connections. Because brain-to-muscle pathways are very important in our movement control, restoring function of these pathways may improve movement problems after injuries. Spinal cord injury causes damage to the brain-to-muscle connection. However, when the injury is "incomplete", there is a possibility that some of the brain-to-muscle pathways are still connected and may be trained to improve movement function. For examining brain-to-muscle pathways, investigators use a transcranial magnetic stimulator. Investigators hope that the results of this research study will help us develop new treatments for people who have movement disabilities. This study will require about 42 visits over the first 14 weeks, and another 6 visits over an additional 3 months. Each visit will take about 1 ½ hours.
Regaining arm/hand function is one of the top priorities of individuals with tetraplegia and is a challenging problem, partly due to the complex nature of upper limb motor function. Through mass practice and conventional therapy, functions can be restored partially, likely through compensation rather than induction of relevant corticospinal plasticity. In such cases, corticospinal recruitment of motoneurons and resulting muscle activation could remain impaired and continue to limit function recovery. In people with incomplete SCI, voluntary activation of the muscles below the injury level is often diminished, due at least partly to impaired motor unit behaviors. Abnormal motoneuron recruitment and motor unit firing, also found in other CNS disorders, would certainly hinder effective production of motor functions. Thus, to enhance upper limb motor rehabilitation beyond what conventional therapy has been able to achieve, a method to improve corticospinal recruitment of a targeted pool of motoneurons would be needed. Here, investigators hypothesize that wrist extensor MEP up-conditioning can improve forearm motor functions in people with cervical SCI by increasing the corticospinal excitability and improving corticospinal recruitment of wrist extensor motoneurons.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Operant Conditioning | Experimental | This intervention requires 6 baseline visits and 24 intervention visits, each of which is approximately 1.5 hours. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Operant Conditioning | Behavioral | Operant conditioning is a method to induce behavioral learning based on the consequence (reward) of the behavior. With operant conditioning of the motor evoked potential (MEP), the neuronal excitability and behavior of the corticospinal pathway that involves production of MEP is targeted and trained (i.e., up-trained with up-conditioning). The individual is rewarded only for changing the target muscle's MEP size without changing background muscle activity. Since MEP size reflects the corticospinal excitability at or just before the time of stimulation, during MEP up-conditioning trials, the individual is urged to increase the corticospinal excitability for the target muscle. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent change in the size of the Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) from baseline to final conditioning sessions. | MEP from each session is expressed as the percent of the initial MEP size (average MEP size from the 6 baseline sessions). The final MEP size is the fitted estimate of the MEP size at the end of 24 intervention sessions. MEP size is a measurement of the integrity of the corticospinal tract. | Baseline (average of 6 sessions over 2 weeks) and final phase (average of sessions 19-24 over weeks 7-8 of intervention) |
| Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure--version III (SCIM III) score | To measure basic functional independence, we will use the most recent version of the SCIM (SCIM III), which is self-reported and comprises 19 items in three sub-scales: (1) self-care (6 items, subscore 0-20); (2) respiration and sphincter management (4 items, sub-score 0-40); and (3) mobility (9 items, subscore 0-40). The total score ranges from 0-100. The items are weighted in terms of their presumed clinical relevance. SCIM score will be used for calculation of MCID. | Baseline (Week 0), mid-intervention (Week 5, after session 12), post-intervention (Week 9, after session 24), and follow-up at 1 month (Week 13) and 3 months (Week 21) post-intervention. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult (≥18 yrs old)
a history of injury to spinal cord at or above C6
neurologically stable (>1 year post SCI)
medical clearance to participate
weak wrist extension at least unilaterally
expectation that current medication will be maintained without change for at least 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupational Therapist | Contact | (843) 792-6313 | stecb@musc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aiko Thompson, PhD | Medical University of South Carolina | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of South Carolina | Recruiting | Charleston | South Carolina | 29407 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| D004194 | Disease |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019054 | Evoked Potentials, Motor |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005071 | Evoked Potentials |
| D000071080 | Cortical Excitability |
| D055724 | Electrophysiological Phenomena |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |
| D009424 | Nervous System Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided