Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to develop a typology-based intervention delivered by smoking cessation (SC) counsellors to prevent smoking relapse in ex-smokers who recently quit. The two main research questions include (1) Can a typology-based smoking relapse prevention intervention be feasible and accepted by the smokers and SC counsellors who deliver the new intervention? (2) What is the preliminary evidence on the efficacy of the typology-based smoking relapse prevention to increase tobacco abstinence in ex-smokers who have recently quit? If the intervention shows at least a small effect size (i.e. risk ratio>1.3), or the intervention is feasible while modifications can potentially increase the efficacy, a future definitive RCT is warranted.
Phase 1 Q-method outcomes The outcomes of Phase 1 of this study will be Q-sorts completed by participants which will be inter-correlated producing a matrix for factor rotation and automatic flagging, and the z-score and the factor of the Q-sorts will be calculated.
The tobacco epidemic remains a pressing global health challenge, with tobacco-related illness contributing significantly to a high death rate worldwide. Smoking is the predominant mode of tobacco consumption worldwide and serves as the driving force behind this epidemic. According to the World Health Organization, there are an estimated 1.3 billion tobacco users worldwide currently. In Hong Kong, the smoking rate is estimated to be around 9.5%, with approximately 580 000 daily smokers in 2021. Despite the rate has decreased significantly from 23.3% in 1982, the Hong Kong government aims to further reduce the prevalence from 9.5% to 7.8% in 2025. The high prevalence of smoking imposes a significant public health burden worldwide, with tobacco use killing up to 50% of its users. Additionally, smoking causes cancers, stroke, cardiovascular diseases and respiratory diseases, with around 7000 deaths reported each year. One approach to reduce the smoking prevalence is to promote smoking cessation (SC) treatment among current smokers.
Young smokers constitute a large cohort of new smokers every year. It is estimated that up to 90% of daily smokers first tried smoking before 18 years old. Published studies consistently highlight the concerning prevalence of youth smoking within Hong Kong's community. Data from the recent school survey highlighted that despite only 1.2% of secondary school engages in smoking, a significant portion (7.4%, equivalent to around 24 000 students) of the youth population have previously engaged in smoking behaviour. The rate of youth ever smokers remain high at 7.4% in Hong Kong, equivalent to approximately 24 000 secondary school students, suggesting that youths are eagerly experimenting. This is also evident in the high prevalence of youths trying other tobacco products such as e-cigarettes or heated tobacco products, from 57.4% (178/310) in 2017 to 2018 to 85.9% (243/283) in 2019 to 2020. The shift from occasional smoking to dependency in youth is a crucial stage, making the adolescent years a key period for understanding and addressing smoking behaviours. It represents a key window for targeted interventions to prevent the progression towards regular smoking habits.
Smoking imposes severe health risks and long-term consequences. Effects of tobacco are well demonstrated including the effects of nicotine on brain development. The prevalence of tobacco use among youths not only jeopardizes their immediate health but negatively impacts their future well-being. Moreover, observations from Hong Kong further emphasize the pressing need for effective SC initiatives tailored to the unique needs of youths. The multifaceted challenges such as peer pressure and social influences are faced by struggling youths.
In response to these identified needs, it is imperative to develop comprehensive youth-orientated SC programs that encompass various aspects of prevention, intervention and support. Evidence-based strategies such as counselling services have shown promising outcomes in promoting smoke-free lifestyles among youths. Additionally, collaborations among healthcare institutions, government agencies and community organizations are crucial for maximizing the reach and effectiveness of cessation efforts. By addressing the health needs of local community through targeted youth SC initiatives, the investigators can significantly mitigate the adverse health effects of tobacco use among Hong Kong's young population.
Phase 3 Randomized control trial outcomes The primary outcomes of Phase 3 of this study will be smokers' (1) self-reported abstinence in the past 30 days at 2-month follow-up; (2) iScreen OFD Cotinine Saliva Test Kit (<30ng/ml) biochemical validated tobacco abstinence; (3) the difference of the feasibility and acceptability score of the typology-based intervention between the intervention and control group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typology-based Intervention (Intervention group) | Experimental | In the Typology-based intervention group, in addition to routine counselling, counsellors will apply typological counselling protocol for the participants. The counselling protocol includes 12 distinguishing statement in Q-methodology. Counsellor will discuss these statements with participants and collect their viewpoints on these statements. After the counselling session, participant can chat with the AI chatbot in WhatsApp for 30 days. The chatbot is specially designed and able to read the content of typological counselling of each participant and provide instant response. In addition to incoming message, the AI chatbot will sent personalized e-messages automatically to encourage participants to engage in discussion with chatbot. The frequency of messages will be one message per week, total 4 for 4 weeks. |
|
| Routine Treatment (Control Group) | Active Comparator | In the Routine Treatment group, the routine smoking cessation counselling, including generic advice on preventing smoking relapse, will be retained. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| typology-based intervention | Behavioral | The typology-based intervention includes: (1) a typology-based counselling, (2) instant response from a specially designed AI Chatbot for 30 days (3) Chatbot initiated AI message for 4 weeks (one message per week). All interventions and materials are delivered by smoking counselling. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| self-reported abstinence in the past 30 days at 2-month follow-up | 2 mouths | |
| iScreen OFD Cotinine Saliva Test Kit (<30ng/ml) biochemical validated tobacco abstinence | Participants who report tobacco abstinence will be invited for a biochemical validation to test if his/her saliva cotinine is less than 30ng/ml measured by the iScreen OFD Cotinine Saliva Test Kit. | 2 months |
| the difference of the feasibility and acceptability score of the typology-based intervention between the intervention and control group. | The investigators will have 4 feasibility questions and 4 appropriateness questions for counsellor to answer from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree). Also, the investigators will have 4 acceptability questions for ex-smokers to answer. The investigators would like to observe if there is a difference between the intervention group and the control group | 2 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time required for the counselling | The average time required for the typological counselling in minutes | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Compliance rate of the SC counsellors in following the intervention protocol |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria (Phase 1):
Inclusion Criteria (Phase 3):
Exclusion Criteria (Phase 1 & 3):
Inclusion Criteria (Phase 2) (for SC counsellors) :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Hor Yine Cheung, Dr. | Contact | +852 39103198 | chycheun@hku.hk |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKS Faculty of Medicine | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26845694 | Background | Zabala A, Pascual U. Bootstrapping Q Methodology to Improve the Understanding of Human Perspectives. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0148087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148087. eCollection 2016. | |
| Background | Watts S, Stenner P. Doing the fieldwork: participants, materials and procedure. 2012 2022/03/11. In: Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation . London: SAGE Publications Ltd | ||
| 22477813 |
Not provided
Not provided
Research data and documentation will be available upon request
3 years after the completion of the relevant publications
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012907 | Smoking |
| D016739 | Behavior, Addictive |
| D016540 | Smoking Cessation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D003192 | Compulsive Behavior |
| D007175 | Impulsive Behavior |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
two arms: typology-based intervention (intervention group) & routine treatment (control group)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Routine Treatment | Behavioral | The routine smoking cessation intervention includes: (1) Routine counselling generic advice on preventing smoking relapse |
|
There were 26 questions in the counselling protocol. SC counsellors have to record the number of questions asked during the typological counselling. The rate is calculated by "number of questions asked"/26
| End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Proportion of screened clients who participate in the RCT | The proportion is calculated by "Number of enrolled participants" / "Total number of participant screened" | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Dropout rate of the participants who consent to the RCT | The dropout rate is calculated by "Number of participants dropout from study" / "Total number of enrolled participant" | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Satisfaction on the SC counsellors | Satisfaction on the SC counsellors is measured by a 5 point Likert scale reported by the enrolled participants, from 1: Very Dissatisfied to 5: Very Satisfied. | 2 months |
| Satisfaction on the AI chatbot and the chatbot initiated e-messages | Satisfaction on AI chatbot and the chatbot initiated is measured by a 10 point Likert scale reported by the enrolled participants, from 1: Very Dissatisfied to 10: Very Satisfied. | 2 months |
| Frequency of reading the chatbot initiated e-messages | The Frequency of reading the e-messages is measured by 5 point Likert scale, that indicate the number of e-messages that the participant had read, from 1 (indicate the participant had read none of the e-messages), to 5 (indicate the participant had read all of the e-messages). | 2 months |
| Perceived effectiveness on the intervention | The perceived effectiveness on the intervention is measured by a 10 point likert scale. Participant will rate the usefulness of the intervention received in helping them to maintain smoking abstinence (10: Very useful | 0: Useless). | 2 months |
| Satisfaction on the enrolment procedures | Satisfaction on the enrolment procedures is measured by a 10 point Likert scale reported by the participants (0: The enrollment procedure is slow and complicated | 10: the enrollment procedure is fast and simple). | 2 months |
| Intention to recommend the intervention to other smokers | Intention to recommend the intervention to other smokers is measured by a 10 point Likert scale, 10: strongly recommended to other smokers | 0: not recommended to other smoker | 2 months |
| Satisfaction about the intervention from SC counsellor | Satisfaction about the intervention from SC counsellor is measured by a 5 point Likert scale. SC counsellor will rate the effectiveness of the typological counselling in helping their client to quit smoking, from 1: very ineffective to 5: very effective. | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Perceived appropriateness of the intervention length from SC counsellor | The perceived appropriateness of the intervention length from SC counsellor is measured by a 5 point Likert scale. SC counsellor will be asked if they agreed that the length of the typological counselling is suitable for their client, from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Satisfaction on the enrolment and counselling procedures from SC counsellors | The satisfaction on the enrolment procedures from SC counsellors is measured by a 5 point Likert scale. Counsellors will be asked if they agreed that enrolment and counselling procedures is simple and could be easily done in the SC clinics, from 1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree. | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Perceived effectiveness of the counselling protocol from SC counsellor | The perceived effectiveness of the counselling protocol from SC counsellor is measured by a 5 point Likert scale. SC counsellor will be asked if they agreed that the typological intervention can help them screen out smokers who are prone to relapse, from 1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree. | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Perceived clients' acceptance of the intervention from SC counsellor | The Perceived clients' acceptance of the intervention from SC counsellor is measured by a 5 point Likert scale. Participants are asked if they agreed that counselling content provided the SC counselling gain their trust and acceptance, from 1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree. | 2 months |
| Intention to apply this intervention in other clients from SC counsellors | Intention to apply this intervention in other clients from SC counsellors is measured by a 5 point Likert scale. SC counsellors are asked if they want to apply the typological intervention to other clients in future, from 1: SC counsellors will not apply it to their client in the future, to 5: SC counsellors want to apply it their client in the future. | End of all follow-up (approximately 6 month) |
| Background |
| Karpinski JP, Timpe EM, Lubsch L. Smoking cessation treatment for adolescents. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Oct;15(4):249-63. |
| 22248234 | Background | Bailey SR, Crew EE, Riske EC, Ammerman S, Robinson TN, Killen JD. Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapies to aid smoking cessation in adolescents. Paediatr Drugs. 2012 Apr 1;14(2):91-108. doi: 10.2165/11594370-000000000-00000. |
| 35609957 | Background | Duncan Millar J, Mason H, Kidd L. What is Q methodology? Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Jul;25(3):77-78. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103568. Epub 2022 May 24. No abstract available. |
| 21709821 | Background | Bowen NK, Lee JS, Weller BE. SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RISK AND PROTECTION: A TYPOLOGY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS. Child Sch. 2007;29(4):229-242. doi: 10.1093/cs/29.4.229. |
| 25622078 | Background | Tombor I, Shahab L, Herbec A, Neale J, Michie S, West R. Smoker identity and its potential role in young adults' smoking behavior: A meta-ethnography. Health Psychol. 2015 Oct;34(10):992-1003. doi: 10.1037/hea0000191. Epub 2015 Jan 26. |
| 15119521 | Background | Jarvelaid M. Adolescent tobacco smoking and associated psychosocial health risk factors. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Mar;22(1):50-3. doi: 10.1080/02813430310000988. |
| 29527597 | Background | Tombor I, Vangeli E, West R, Shahab L. Progression towards smoking cessation: Qualitative analysis of successful, unsuccessful, and never quitters. J Subst Use. 2017 Oct 5;23(2):214-222. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2017.1378746. eCollection 2018. |
| 17624981 | Background | Rose JS, Chassin L, Presson C, Sherman SJ, Stein MD, Col N. A latent class typology of young women smokers. Addiction. 2007 Aug;102(8):1310-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01889.x. |
| 26767340 | Background | Thomas JL, Luo X, Bengtson J, Wang Q, Ghidei W, Nyman J, Lust K, An L, Wetter DW, Epstein L, Ahluwalia JS. Enhancing Quit & Win contests to improve cessation among college smokers: a randomized clinical trial. Addiction. 2016 Feb;111(2):331-9. doi: 10.1111/add.13144. Epub 2015 Nov 11. |
| 32418800 | Background | Villanti AC, West JC, Klemperer EM, Graham AL, Mays D, Mermelstein RJ, Higgins ST. Smoking-Cessation Interventions for U.S. Young Adults: Updated Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 May 14. |
| 27288378 | Background | Chaiton M, Diemert L, Cohen JE, Bondy SJ, Selby P, Philipneri A, Schwartz R. Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 9;6(6):e011045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011045. |
| 26584272 | Background | Rosa JD, Aloise-Young P. A Qualitative Study of Smoker Identity Among College Student Smokers. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(12):1510-7. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1018549. Epub 2015 Nov 19. |
| Background | Davey, G. and Zhao, X. (2020), Turning Points to Becoming a Tobacco Smoker: Smoking Initiation and Identity Change among Chinese Youth. Symbolic Interaction, 43: 308-331 |
| 37648287 | Background | Bitar S, Collonnaz M, O'Loughlin J, Kestens Y, Ricci L, Martini H, Agrinier N, Minary L. A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies on Factors Associated With Smoking Cessation Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Jan 1;26(1):2-11. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad167. |
| 33021650 | Background | Barrington-Trimis JL, Braymiller JL, Unger JB, McConnell R, Stokes A, Leventhal AM, Sargent JD, Samet JM, Goodwin RD. Trends in the Age of Cigarette Smoking Initiation Among Young Adults in the US From 2002 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019022. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19022. |
| 18565577 | Background | An LC, Klatt C, Perry CL, Lein EB, Hennrikus DJ, Pallonen UE, Bliss RL, Lando HA, Farley DM, Ahluwalia JS, Ehlinger EP. The RealU online cessation intervention for college smokers: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2008 Aug;47(2):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.04.011. Epub 2008 May 2. |
| 38329816 | Background | Cho ER, Brill IK, Gram IT, Brown PE, Jha P. Smoking Cessation and Short- and Longer-Term Mortality. NEJM Evid. 2024 Mar;3(3):EVIDoa2300272. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300272. Epub 2024 Feb 8. |
| 28111012 | Background | Li WHC, Chan SSC, Wang MP, Ho KY, Cheung YTY, Chan VWF, Lam TH. An Evaluation of the Youth Quitline Service Young Hong Kong Smokers. J Adolesc Health. 2017 May;60(5):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.022. Epub 2017 Jan 19. |
| 31122545 | Background | Ho SY, Chen J, Leung LT, Mok HY, Wang L, Wang MP, Lam TH. Adolescent Smoking in Hong Kong: Prevalence, Psychosocial Correlates, and Prevention. J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jun;64(6S):S19-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.003. |
| 24021991 | Background | McClure LA, Arheart KL, Lee DJ, Sly DF, Dietz NA. Young adult former ever smokers: the role of type of smoker, quit attempts, quit aids, attitudes/beliefs, and demographics. Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Sep 8. |
| 22983224 | Background | Goriounova NA, Mansvelder HD. Short- and long-term consequences of nicotine exposure during adolescence for prefrontal cortex neuronal network function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(12):a012120. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012120. |
| Background | School of Public Health of the University of Hong Kong. School-based survey on smoking among students in 2020/21. |
| Background | US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012. |
| 35133411 | Background | Rigotti NA, Kruse GR, Livingstone-Banks J, Hartmann-Boyce J. Treatment of Tobacco Smoking: A Review. JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):566-577. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0395. |
| Background | World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2019: Offer help to quit tobacco use. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 |
| 16565461 | Background | McGhee SM, Ho LM, Lapsley HM, Chau J, Cheung WL, Ho SY, Pow M, Lam TH, Hedley AJ. Cost of tobacco-related diseases, including passive smoking, in Hong Kong. Tob Control. 2006 Apr;15(2):125-30. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013292. |