Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective cohort study of outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient colorectal surgery at a single institution to study outpatient colectomy as a viable treatment option for a select group of patients requiring colon and rectal surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Same Day Colectomy | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same-Day Colectomy | Other | study, they will undergo extensive education during their preoperative visit. Perioperative education includes management of perioperative medications, bowel prep and perioperative antibiotics. Perioperative education will include that of the patient and their designated caregiver. Perioperative nursing staff will go over postoperative discharge instructions again. A custom discharge instruction sheet will be made and given to all patients upon discharge. On days 1 and 3 postoperatively, patients will receive a phone call or virtual visit from a member of the research team. Questions will be asked of patients based on a script made. Patients will then be seen in the clinic between postoperative day 5-7. Patients' medical record will be followed for six months postoperatively to track emergency department visits, readmissions, and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications will include surgical site infection, deep surgical infection, bleeding requiring transfusion, ana |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital Readmission | The primary outcome of this study is the 30-day rate of readmission to the hospital following same day colectomy | 30-Days post-procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| rate of surgical site infection | 30-days Post Procedure | |
| rate of deep surgical infection | 30-days Post Procedure | |
| rate of anastomotic leak |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eugene Kim, MD | University of Arizona | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banner University Medical Center Phoenix | Recruiting | Phoenix | Arizona | 85006 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33349570 | Background | Bourgouin S, Monchal T, Schlienger G, Franck L, Lacroix G, Balandraud P. Eligibility criteria for ambulatory colectomy. J Visc Surg. 2022 Feb;159(1):21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 19. | |
| 33094353 | Background | Studniarek A, Borsuk DJ, Kochar K, Park JJ, Marecik SJ. Feasibility assessment of outpatient colorectal resections at a tertiary referral center. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):501-508. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03782-w. Epub 2020 Oct 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to show that outpatient colectomy is safe and feasible for patients that were rigorously screened preoperatively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 30-days Post-procedure |
| rate of bleeding requiring transfusion | 30-Days Post-Procedure |
| rate of postoperative ileus | 30-Days Post-Procedure |
| rate of reoperation | 30-Days Post-Procedure |
| reintervention | 30-Days Post-Procedure |
| rate of acute kidney injury or renal failure | 30-Days Post-Procedure |
| rate of reintubation or need for prolonged ventilation | 30-Days Post-Procedure |
| Rate of mortality | 30-Days Post Procedure |
| 34970026 | Background | Campbell S, Fichera A, Thomas S, Papaconstantinou H, Essani R. Outpatient colectomy-a dream or reality? Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2021 Sep 16;35(1):24-27. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1973327. eCollection 2022. |
| 35419638 | Background | Lee L, Eustache J, Tran-McCaslin M, Basam M, Baldini G, Rudikoff AG, Liberman S, Feldman LS, McLemore EC. North American multicentre evaluation of a same-day discharge protocol for minimally invasive colorectal surgery using mHealth or telephone remote post-discharge monitoring. Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9335-9344. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09208-8. Epub 2022 Apr 13. |
| 25661787 | Background | Gignoux B, Pasquer A, Vulliez A, Lanz T. Outpatient colectomy within an enhanced recovery program. J Visc Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7. |
| 35570059 | Background | Curfman KR, Poola AS, Blair GE, Kosnik CL, Pille SA, Thilo EL, Hawkins ME, Rashidi L. Ambulatory colectomy: A pilot protocol for same day discharge in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2022 Aug;224(2):757-760. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.039. Epub 2022 May 11. |
| 29727328 | Background | Gignoux B, Gosgnach M, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Blanchet MC, Frering V, Faucheron JL, Chasserant P. Short-term Outcomes of Ambulatory Colectomy for 157 Consecutive Patients. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):317-321. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002800. |
| 28097305 | Background | Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. |
| 27451872 | Background | Papageorge CM, Zhao Q, Foley EF, Harms BA, Heise CP, Carchman EH, Kennedy GD. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open colectomy for colon cancer. J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 22. |
| 24781574 | Background | Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, Mantyh C, Migaly J, Jin J, Roche AM, Eisenstein EL, Edwards R, Anstrom KJ, Moon RE, Gan TJ; Enhanced Recovery Study Group. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):1052-61. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000206. |