Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Spaulding Clinical Research LLC | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
With the increasing prevalence and use of cannabis products by the public, there exists a need to better understand the safety impact of cannabis use, particularly when it comes to subjective perceptions of drug effect and driving impairment. This study aims to evaluate the dose-dependent effects of oral Δ9-THC alone and in combination with alcohol (0.08% BAC [Blood Alcohol Concentration]) on driving performance and subjective feeling in healthy adults. The results of this study will address current knowledge gaps on the effects of oral Δ9-THC on driving impairment across a clinically relevant dose range.
The cannabis plant contains bioactive compounds known as cannabinoids, with delta-9 tetrahydrocannabidiol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) being the most well-known cannabinoids in varieties of cannabis. With the increasing prevalence and use of cannabis products by the public, there exists a need to better understand the safety impact of cannabis use, particularly when it comes to subjective perceptions of drug effect and driving impairment. Studies have evaluated the effects of Δ9-THC on perception and driving capacity, however they have largely focused on inhaled routes of administration in experienced users and at relatively high doses. Research on the impact of oral Δ9-THC use in occasional users at lower doses (10 mg and below) on driving capacity is limited. Furthermore, despite the increasing prevalence of concurrent cannabis and alcohol use, there also remains a significant gap in research examining the combined effects of oral THC and alcohol on driving performance. This study aims to evaluate the dose-dependent effects of oral Δ9-THC alone and in combination with alcohol (0.08% BAC [Blood Alcohol Concentration]) on driving performance and subjective feeling in healthy adults. These effects will also be compared to the established alcohol-related impairment benchmark of blood alcohol content (0.08% BAC). The inclusion of an alcohol-only arm targeting 0.08% BAC will serve as a relevant positive control, representing the legal intoxication threshold in most states in the USA and providing a well-characterized impairment baseline against which THC and THC/alcohol combination effects can be measured. The results of this study will address current knowledge gaps on the effects of oral Δ9-THC on driving impairment across a clinically relevant dose range.
In this randomized, double-blind, 6-period crossover study, 48 healthy adult volunteers with driving experience and previous cannabis exposure will receive single oral doses across six treatment conditions: 5 mg THC, 10 mg THC, 5 mg THC combined with alcohol (target BAC of 0.08%), 10 mg THC combined with alcohol (target BAC of 0.08%), alcohol alone (target BAC of 0.08%), and matched placebo, with washout periods between treatments. The study will evaluate the dose-dependent effects of Δ9-THC (with and without alcohol) on both objective driving performance and subjective participant experience. Objectives primarily include standardized driving simulator assessments measuring standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) and standard deviation of speed (SDSP), as well as subjective effects measured through use of Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Assessments will be conducted at baseline and predetermined intervals post-dose over 24 hours.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment A - 5 mg Δ9-THC + Placebo beverage | Experimental | Subjects in this arm will receive one 5 mg oral dose of THC and a placebo beverage |
|
| Treatment B - 10 mg Δ9-THC + Placebo beverage | Experimental | Subjects in this arm will receive one 10 mg oral dose of THC and a placebo beverage |
|
| Treatment C - 5 mg Δ9-THC + Alcohol beverage with BAC target of 0.08% | Experimental | Subjects in this arm will receive one 5 mg oral dose of THC and an alcohol beverage targeting a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% |
|
| Treatment D - 10 mg Δ9-THC + Alcohol beverage with BAC target of 0.08% | Experimental | Subjects in this arm will receive one 10 mg oral dose of THC and an alcohol beverage targeting a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% |
|
| Treatment E - Placebo capsule + Alcohol beverage with BAC target of 0.08% | Active Comparator | Subjects in this arm will receive one placebo capsule and an alcohol beverage targeting a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% as a positive control |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mg Dronabinol (Marinol®) + Placebo Beverage | Drug | Subjects in this arm will receive one dose of 5 mg THC (Dronabinol) with a placebo beverage in one of the assigned treatment days. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Simulated driving performance as measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to alcohol alone. | Simulated driving performance will be measured by the endpoint standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) using a STISIM (model M4000-R) driving simulator after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to active control (alcohol alone). | Up to 8 hours after study drug administration. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Simulated driving performance as measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Simulated driving performance will be measured by the endpoint standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) using a STISIM (model M4000-R) driving simulator after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trupti Indurkar | Contact | 3475740355 | trupti.indurkar@spauldingclinical.com | |
| Karrielyn Gerlach | Contact | 9205172167 | karrielyn.gerlach@spauldingclinical.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Melanie Fein, MD | Spaulding Clinical Research LLC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spaulding Clinical Research | Recruiting | West Bend | Wisconsin | 53095 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Cleveland Clinic. Blood Alcohol Content (BAC). https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22689-blood-alcohol-content-bac | ||
| Background | Dronabinol (Marinol®) capsule label obtained from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/018651s033lbl.pdf | ||
| 36147331 | Background | Zamarripa CA, Novak MD, Weerts EM, Vandrey R, Spindle TR. The effects of oral and vaporized cannabis alone, and in combination with alcohol, on driving performance using the STISIM driving simulator: A two-part, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover clinical laboratory protocol. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 6;13:964749. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.964749. eCollection 2022. | |
| 36322184 |
Not provided
Not provided
Plan is to make data from the study publicly available as part of a manuscript publication. In addition, the protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available online at this site as well as with any eventual publications.
The data will become available at the time of manuscript publication.
No restrictions
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, double-blind, 6-period crossover study in 48 healthy adult volunteers. This study has six 1-day treatment periods with at least 7-day washout between each period.
Not provided
Not provided
The study will be double-blind, and the blind will be maintained through a randomization schedule held by the dispensing pharmacist. The pharmacist (and designated staff member responsible for confirmation of study drug dose and measurement of blood alcohol concentration) will be unblinded to subject treatment assignment; however, the pharmacist and any unblinded staff will not perform any study procedures other than study drug preparation, and dispensing, and measuring blood alcohol concentration. An unblinded staff will have no communication of results to any blinded study personnel during the study assessments. Blinded staff will not have access to participants' BAC results until all study assessments are complete before the checkout procedure begins.
|
| Treatment F - Placebo capsule + Placebo beverage | Placebo Comparator | Subjects in this arm will receive one placebo capsule and a placebo beverage |
|
| 10 mg Dronabinol (Marinol®) + Placebo Beverage | Drug | Subjects in this arm will receive one dose of 10 mg THC (Dronabinol) with a placebo beverage in one of the assigned treatment days. |
|
| 5 mg Dronabinol (Marinol®) + Alcohol Beverage | Drug | Subjects in this arm will receive one dose of 5 mg THC (Dronabinol) with an alcoholic beverage (to achieve a target BAC of 0.08%) in one of the assigned treatment days. |
|
| 10 mg Dronabinol (Marinol®) + Alcohol Beverage | Drug | Subjects in this arm will receive one dose of 10 mg THC (Dronabinol) with an alcoholic beverage (to achieve a target BAC of 0.08%) in one of the assigned treatment days. |
|
| Placebo Capsule + Alcohol Beverage | Drug | Subjects in this arm will receive placebo capsule with an alcoholic beverage (to achieve a target BAC of 0.08%) in one of the assigned treatment days. |
|
| Placebo Capsule + Placebo Beverage | Drug | Subjects in this arm will receive a placebo capsule with a placebo beverage in one of the assigned treatment days. |
|
| Up to 8 hours after study drug administration. |
| Simulated driving performance as measured by Standard Deviation of Speed Position (SDSP) after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Simulated driving performance will be measured by the endpoint standard deviation of speed position (SDSP) using a STISIM (model M4000-R) driving simulator after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo. | Up to 8 hours after study drug administration. |
| Simulated driving performance as measured by Standard Deviation of Speed Position (SDSP) after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to alcohol alone. | Simulated driving performance will be measured by the endpoint standard deviation of speed position (SDSP) using a STISIM (model M4000-R) driving simulator after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to alcohol alone. | Up to 8 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective self-rated driving impairment after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective self-rated driving impairment after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS "drug driving impairment"): "How much did the study drug affect your driving?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Drug Effect" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Drug Effect" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS "Drug Effect"): "Are you feeling a drug effect right now?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Willingness to Drive" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Willingness to Drive" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS "Willingness to Drive"): "Would you drive in your current state right now?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Confidence in Driving" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Confidence in Driving" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS Confidence in Driving): "How confident are you in your driving ability?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Liking" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Liking" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS Liking): "How much do you like the drug effects right now?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "High" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "High" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS High): "How high do you feel right now?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Bad Effects" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Bad Effects" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS Bad Effects): "Are you feeling any bad effects right now?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Drowsy" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Drowsy" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS Drowsy): "How drowsy do you feel right now?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Take Drug Again" after Δ9-THC administration alone or in combination with alcohol compared to placebo. | Maximum subjective feeling state of VAS "Take Drug Again" after Δ9-THC administration (5 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg with alcohol, 10 mg with alcohol) compared to placebo will be measured by the VAS question (VAS Take Drug Again): "How likely are you to take this drug again?" | Up to 24 hours after study drug administration. |
| Spaulding Clinical | Recruiting | West Bend | Wisconsin | 53095 | United States |
|
| Background |
| Garrisson H, Scholey A, Verster JC, Shiferaw B, Benson S. Effects of alcohol intoxication on driving performance, confidence in driving ability, and psychomotor function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Dec;239(12):3893-3902. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06260-z. Epub 2022 Nov 2. |
| 28376280 | Background | Weerts EM, Wand GS, Maher B, Xu X, Stephens MA, Yang X, McCaul ME. Independent and Interactive Effects of OPRM1 and DAT1 Polymorphisms on Alcohol Consumption and Subjective Responses in Social Drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;41(6):1093-1104. doi: 10.1111/acer.13384. Epub 2017 Apr 26. |
| 3690446 | Background | Fisher HR, Simpson RI, Kapur BM. Calculation of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) by sex, weight, number of drinks and time. Can J Public Health. 1987 Sep-Oct;78(5):300-4. No abstract available. |
| 25957748 | Background | Veldstra JL, Bosker WM, de Waard D, Ramaekers JG, Brookhuis KA. Comparing treatment effects of oral THC on simulated and on-the-road driving performance: testing the validity of driving simulator drug research. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Aug;232(16):2911-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3927-9. Epub 2015 May 10. |
| 34403895 | Background | Brooks-Russell A, Brown T, Friedman K, Wrobel J, Schwarz J, Dooley G, Ryall KA, Steinhart B, Amioka E, Milavetz G, Sam Wang G, Kosnett MJ. Simulated driving performance among daily and occasional cannabis users. Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;160:106326. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106326. Epub 2021 Aug 14. |
| 23220273 | Background | Hartman RL, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving skills. Clin Chem. 2013 Mar;59(3):478-92. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.194381. Epub 2012 Dec 7. |
| 22553980 | Background | Bosker WM, Kuypers KP, Theunissen EL, Surinx A, Blankespoor RJ, Skopp G, Jeffery WK, Walls HC, van Leeuwen CJ, Ramaekers JG. Medicinal Delta(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (dronabinol) impairs on-the-road driving performance of occasional and heavy cannabis users but is not detected in Standard Field Sobriety Tests. Addiction. 2012 Oct;107(10):1837-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03928.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12. |
| 37045988 | Background | Schnakenberg Martin AM, Flynn LT, Sefik E, Luddy C, Cortes-Briones J, Skosnik PD, Pittman B, Ranganathan M, D'Souza DC. Preliminary study of the interactive effects of THC and ethanol on self-reported ability and simulated driving, subjective effects, and cardiovascular responses. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Jun;240(6):1235-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06356-0. Epub 2023 Apr 12. |
| 37129083 | Background | Manning B, Hayley AC, Catchlove S, Shiferaw B, Stough C, Downey LA. Effect of CannEpil(R) on simulated driving performance and co-monitoring of ocular activity: A randomised controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol. 2023 May;37(5):472-483. doi: 10.1177/02698811231170360. Epub 2023 May 2. |
| 26144593 | Background | Hartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Pierce RS, Gorelick DA, Gaffney G, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving lateral control with and without alcohol. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Sep 1;154:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jun 23. |
| 38074719 | Background | Hartley S, Simon N, Cardozo B, Larabi IA, Alvarez JC. Can inhaled cannabis users accurately evaluate impaired driving ability? A randomized controlled trial. Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 22;11:1234765. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1234765. eCollection 2023. |
| 33258890 | Background | Arkell TR, Vinckenbosch F, Kevin RC, Theunissen EL, McGregor IS, Ramaekers JG. Effect of Cannabidiol and Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on Driving Performance: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Dec 1;324(21):2177-2186. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21218. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002189 | Marijuana Abuse |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013759 | Dronabinol |
| D000431 | Ethanol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002186 | Cannabinoids |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
Not provided
Not provided