Safety and Efficacy of New, Non-thermal Ablation Techniques for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation - A Comparison of Two Ablation Systems
Safety and Efficacy of New, Non-thermal Ablation Techniques for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation - A Comparison of Two Ablation Systems
Two non-thermal ablation techniques approved for routine clinical practice (CE-marked) for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are compared in a 1:1 randomization to investigate patient data, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety.
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to undergo pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) with either single-shot PFA (FARAPULSE) or single-tip PFA (Galvanize Therapeutics). Baseline characteristics, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were analyzed. In each group, a subset of consecutive patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging to assess silent cerebral lesions and was scheduled for biomarker assessment (blood sampling) to evaluate inflammation and troponin release after PFA.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: