Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Direct MS Canada | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the effects of combining balance training with electrical stimulation techniques in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). MS commonly impairs leg strength, coordination, and balance, increasing the risk of falls and reducing independence. The interventions include:Balance training only, Balance training with Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), and Balance training with FES and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (TSCS). FES delivers small electrical pulses to leg muscles, while TSCS delivers electrical signals through the skin to stimulate the spinal cord and enhance motor control.
The study will enroll up to 24 participants over a 3-year period. This trial is funded by MS Canada. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) balance training only, (2) balance training with FES, or (3) balance training with FES and TSCS. All participants will complete 12 supervised training sessions over 6 weeks. During each session, participants will engage in interactive balance games while standing in a safety harness.Outcome assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline (prior to training), post-intervention (after 6 weeks), and follow-up (8 weeks after training).
Assessments will include:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance training only | Sham Comparator | Participants in this group complete the standardized balance training program with sham electrical stimulation. |
|
| Balance training with FES | Active Comparator | This group will receive active FES+ sham TSCS (FES only group) duing balance training |
|
| Balance training wiith combined neuromodulation (TSCS+FES) | Active Comparator | This group will receive both TSCS & FES (combined neuromodulation) during balance training |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance training with FES | Other | Participants assigned to this group complete a standardized balance training program while receiving FES to the lower limb muscles. Training sessions involve standing in a safety harness and performing interactive, game-based balance tasks on a force plate that provides real-time visual feedback of body sway. FES will be applied bilaterally to specific leg muscles (e.g., tibialis anterior, quadriceps, gastrocnemius) using surface electrodes. Stimulation parameters (pulse width, frequency, and amplitude) are individually adjusted to produce visible yet comfortable muscle contractions that support functional standing and balance activities. Stimulation is delivered in synchrony with balance exercises to augment muscle activation during postural adjustments. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Timed Up and Go (TUG) | Participants begin seated in a standard chair with their back against the chairrest and arms on the armrests. On the command "go," they stand up, walk 3 meters at a comfortable and safe pace, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. The time to complete the task is recorded in seconds, with shorter times indicating better mobility. For the dual-task cognitive TUG, participants perform the same procedure while simultaneously completing a cognitive task (counting backward by threes). The score is the time in seconds to complete the task, with shorter times indicating better mobility. | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| Timed 25 feet walk test (T25FWT) | The Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FWT) is a standardized clinical measure of walking speed. Participants are instructed to walk a distance of 25 feet at their usual comfortable pace. Timing is recorded over the middle 6 meters to minimize the effects of acceleration and deceleration, with 2-meter lead-in and 2-meter lead-out zones. The test is performed twice, and the average walking speed (m/s) is calculated, with higher speeds indicating better mobility. | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| Berg Balance Scale (BBS): | BBS is a 14-item clinical assessment of static and dynamic balance. Each item evaluates performance on a functional task such as standing unsupported, reaching forward, turning, or standing on one leg. Tasks are scored on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (unable to perform) to 4 (independent performance), with a maximum total score of 56. Higher scores indicate better balance | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Neurophysiological assessment:corticospinal excitability | The strength of the connection between the brain and muscles will be measured using TMS. During this test, the participant sits comfortably in a chair while a small device placed over the head delivers brief magnetic pulses. These pulses activate specific brain areas and the responses in the muscles are recorded, providing information about brain-muscle communication.The MEP (motor evoked potential) score is the amplitude of the muscle response in microvolts (µV or mV), with larger amplitudes indicating stronger corticospinal excitability and smaller or absent responses reflecting weaker or impaired brain-muscle connectivity. |
Not provided
Participants will be eligible if they meet the following conditions:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Lyndhurst Center | Recruiting | Toronto | Ontario | m4g3v9 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41990010 | Derived | Tajali S, Scandiffio J, Ali-Hassan Y, Lim D, Ghosh R, Atputharaj S, Musselman K, Simpson R, Masani K. A pilot randomized controlled trial of neuromodulation-augmented balance training in people with multiple sclerosis: STIM-Balance Protocol. PLoS One. 2026 Apr 16;21(4):e0346491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346491. eCollection 2026. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a pilot, assessor-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Balance training wiith combined neuromodulation (TSCS+FES) | Other | Participants in this group complete the standardized balance training program while receiving both FES and TSCS. Training sessions take place in a safety harness and involve interactive, game-based balance exercises performed on a force plate with real-time visual feedback of body sway.FES is delivered bilaterally to lower limb muscles (e.g., tibialis anterior, quadriceps, gastrocnemius) through surface electrodes. Stimulation parameters (pulse width, frequency, amplitude) are individualized to produce visible, comfortable contractions that facilitate muscle activation during postural tasks.TSCS is applied simultaneously via electrodes placed over the thoracolumbar spinal region to modulate spinal excitability and enhance neuromuscular control. Standardized stimulation parameters are used across participants, with adjustments made to ensure tolerance and safety. |
|
| Balance training only | Other | Participants in this group complete the standardized balance training program without electrical stimulation. Sessions are conducted in a safety harness and consist of interactive, game-based balance exercises performed on a force plate, which provides real-time visual feedback of body sway. Tasks are designed to challenge postural control by requiring weight shifting in multiple directions, maintaining stability during perturbations, and progressively increasing task difficulty. |
|
| Static & Dynamic balance tests | For the static balance test, participants will stand for 100 seconds on a force plate under two conditions: (1) eyes open and (2) eyes closed. For the dynamic balance test, participants will stand on the force plate and lean as far as possible in the forward, backward, and sideways directions. During these tasks, body sway, postural movements will be recorded. Visual feedback of calculated body sway will be displayed on a monitor, and participants will be instructed to shift their body toward the indicated directions. | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) | MSWS-12 is a self-reported questionnaire that measures the impact of Multiple Sclerosis on walking ability. It consists of 12 items in which participants rate, on a 5-point scale (from 1 = not at all to 5 = extremely), how much MS has affected various aspects of their walking during the past two weeks (e.g., walking distance, running, climbing stairs, balance while walking). Scores are summed, transformed to a 0-100 scale, and higher values indicate greater perceived walking limitation. The MSWS-12 is widely used in MS research and clinical practice and has demonstrated strong reliability and validity. | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) | FES-I is a self-report questionnaire that assesses concern about falling during everyday activities. It includes 16 items rated on a 4-point scale (1 = not at all concerned to 4 = very concerned), covering a range of indoor and outdoor tasks such as getting dressed, bathing, walking on uneven surfaces, or going out sociall | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale | ABC Scale is a 16-item self-report questionnaire that measures an individual's confidence in maintaining balance during common daily activities. Participants rate their confidence for each activity (e.g., standing on tiptoes, walking on icy sidewalks, reaching, or using an escalator) on a scale from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence). | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| Acceptability Outcomes | TAM-2 questionnaire is a validated self-report tool used to assess user acceptance of new technologies. It measures key domains including perceived usefulness (the extent to which the technology improves task performance), perceived ease of use (the degree to which the technology is user-friendly), attitudes toward use, and behavioral intention to use. Items are typically rated on a Likert-type scale, and higher scores indicate greater acceptance. Participants will also take part in semi-structured qualitative interviews guided by a previously developed framework based on TAM-2. The guide consists of open-ended questions and encourages participants to share their thoughts and experience regarding perceived benefits of the training program across different domains aligned with the TAM-2 framework (behavioral intention, perceived ease of use, usefulness, and usage behavior) | -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) |
| Feasibility and Safety Outcomes | Feasibility outcomes will include recruitment rate, retention rate, and adherence. Recruitment rate refers to the percentage of eligible participants who enrolled relative to the number screened. Retention is defined as the proportion of participants who completed all three assessment time points, and adherence is measured by how many of the 12 training sessions each participant completed. | - All adverse events will bereported throughout the study period - Feasibility metrics at Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) and Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| Neurophysiological Measures :Spinal excitability (SMEPs) | Spinal motor evoked potentials (SMEPs) will be assessed with double-pulse stimulation (Digitimer, Model DS7A, Welwyn Garden City, UK) delivered over L1-L2 (two monophasic pulses with 1ms pulse width and a 50 ms inter-stimulus interval). Surface EMG will be recorded from the more affected side or dominant side in case of symmetrical involvement from four lower-limb muscles: soleus, tibialis anterior, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris. The same amplifier will be used to both amplify and band-pass-filter the data, as described above. Recruitment curves will be generated by increasing stimulation intensity from 5 mA to the participant's maximal tolerable level in 5-mA increments. At each intensity, five paired-pulse stimulations were delivered with 5-second inter-trial intervals. | -Baseline (Week 0, prior to intervention start) -Post-intervention (Week 6, within 1 week after completion of the 12 training sessions) - Follow-up (Week 8 post-intervention, approximately Week 14 from baseline) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009103 | Multiple Sclerosis |
| D051346 | Mobility Limitation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020278 | Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS |
| D020274 | Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D003711 | Demyelinating Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C052602 | proto-oncogene protein c-fes-fps |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided