Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethical committee | Other Identifier | 6 October university for Modern Sciences and Arts |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this (study type: RCT) is to learn if the use of the non-submerged de-epithelized FGG will result in better esthetic outcomes in adults. The main questions that it aims to answer are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ns-dFGG | Active Comparator | This arm will receive a Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft for for the Augmentation of The Keratinized Mucosa |
|
| FGG | Active Comparator | This arm will receive a Conventional Free Gingival Graft for for the Augmentation of The Keratinized Mucosa |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft | Procedure | The Free gingival graft will be de-epithelialized and fixed at the recipient site in a non-submerged manner to increase the keratinized mucosa |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Esthetic Evaluation of Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft (Ns-dFGG) Versus Conventional Free Gingival Graft (cFGG) for the Augmentation of The Keratinized Mucosa | The professional esthetic evaluation will be done using the root coverage esthetic score (RES) by(Cairo et al.,2009). Standardized Clinical photographs will be taken at 6 months, where they will evaluate: Color matching: Score 0, & Score 1: Regarding the color matching to the normal gingiva Soft tissue texture: Score 0, & Score 1: If there is scar formation or keloid appearance Muco-gingival junction (MGJ) alignment: Score 0, & Score 1:If the MGJ is or isn't aligned that of the adjacent teeth | 6 months |
| Esthetic Evaluation of Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft (Ns-dFGG) Versus Conventional Free Gingival Graft (cFGG) for the Augmentation of The Keratinized Mucosa | The patient esthetic evaluation will evaluated at 6 months during the follow-up based on the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS). They will select among 100 scores of color matching: Score 0(Very bad) 50(Average) 100(Excellent) | 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalia Khorshed, Masters candidate | Contact | +201097486667 | khorsheddalia12@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October University for modern sciences and arts (MSA University) | Recruiting | Giza | 11563 | Egypt |
collective data of the study groups will be available
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional FGG | Procedure | The Free gingival graft will be fixed at the recipient site to increase the keratinized mucosa |
|