Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if sub-threshold dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo in adults with chronic neuropathic pain who already have an implanted DRG stimulator. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare active sub-threshold DRG stimulation to sham (device switched off) to see if stimulation has a genuine effect on pain and wellbeing.
Participants will:
Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of adults and is often resistant to conventional drug therapy. The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) has emerged as an important therapeutic target, as abnormal firing in DRG neurons contributes to peripheral and central sensitization. DRG stimulation (DRGS) delivers mild electrical pulses through implanted leads placed near the DRG. Compared with traditional spinal cord stimulation, DRGS provides highly targeted pain relief with fewer unwanted sensations.
Over the past decade, DRGS has become an established treatment for conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), causalgia, chronic low back pain, and post-surgical neuropathic pain. Modern programming favors sub-threshold settings, in which stimulation is delivered below the level that causes tingling sensations (paresthesias). Although widely adopted, the specific contribution of sub-threshold stimulation has never been confirmed in a sham-controlled trial.
This study is the first randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to directly evaluate whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo. Adults with an implanted DRG stimulator who have shown sustained pain relief will be randomized in a two-period crossover design to receive either active sub-threshold stimulation or sham stimulation, each for 5 days, with a washout period in between.
The primary objective is to determine whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduces mean daily pain intensity compared with sham. Secondary objectives include assessing sleep quality, mood, daily activity, and safety/tolerability. Exploratory measures include device logs and rescue medication use.
The findings of this trial will provide critical evidence on the efficacy of sub-threshold DRG stimulation, helping to inform clinical guidelines, payer decisions, and neuromodulation programming strategies worldwide.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subtreshhold DRG-S | Active Comparator | Active Sub-threshold DRG Stimulation Participants receive sub-threshold dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation. Device amplitude is individually titrated to 80% of the perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is felt. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from each participant's established clinical settings. Stimulation is delivered continuously for 5 days. |
|
| Sham | Sham Comparator | Sham Stimulation Participants receive sham stimulation. The implanted DRG stimulator is switched off, with device interrogation logs masked to maintain blinding. The sham condition lasts for 5 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subtreshhold DRG-S | Device | Continuous electrical stimulation delivered through an implanted DRG neurostimulator. Amplitude is set individually to 80% of each participant's perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is produced. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from the participant's established therapeutic settings. This sub-threshold programming distinguishes the intervention from suprathreshold (paresthesia-based) DRG stimulation used in earlier studies. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average daily pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10) | Self-reported pain intensity recorded twice daily (morning and evening) using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Daily scores will be averaged across each treatment and washout period. | Twice daily (morning and evening) from Day 0 through Day 11 (includes both 5-day treatment periods and the two 24-hour washout periods on Day 0 and Day 6). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep quality (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC) | Self-reported sleep quality rated each morning using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better sleep. | Daily in the morning from Day 0 through Day 11. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pedram Tabatabaei Tabatabaei, M.D, Ph.D | Univeristy hospital of northern sweden | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurokirurgiska kliniken. Neuromodulationsenheten | Umeå | Västerbotten County | 90185 | Sweden |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31730273 | Background | Huygen FJPM, Kallewaard JW, Nijhuis H, Liem L, Vesper J, Fahey ME, Blomme B, Morgalla MH, Deer TR, Capobianco RA. Effectiveness and Safety of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Pooled Analysis. Neuromodulation. 2020 Feb;23(2):213-221. doi: 10.1111/ner.13074. Epub 2019 Nov 15. | |
| 35994195 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the published results will be made available. This will include outcome data reported in the manuscript. Data will be available beginning 12 months after publication, with no end date. Access will be granted to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to approval of a proposal and completion of a data use agreement. Data and statistical code will also be deposited in an open repository (OSF)
12 months after publication, with no end date.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the published results, along with the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code, will be made available. Access will be provided to qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or non-profit entities. Requests must include a research proposal and be approved by the study investigators. Access will be granted under a data use agreement that ensures compliance with GDPR and institutional policies. Data will be hosted in an open-access repository (OSF) 12 months after publication of the primary results.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 4, 2025 | Sep 4, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009437 | Neuralgia |
| D020918 | Complex Regional Pain Syndromes |
| D002422 | Causalgia |
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| D017699 | Pelvic Pain |
| D055111 | Failed Back Surgery Syndrome |
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C005703 | salicylhydroxamic acid |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomised, double blinded, sham study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham | Other | The implanted DRG stimulator remains switched off for the entire 5-day period. Device interrogation logs are masked to maintain blinding. No electrical stimulation is delivered, allowing a placebo-controlled comparison with active sub-threshold stimulation. |
|
| Mood (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC) |
Self-reported mood rated each evening using the PGIC scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better mood. |
| Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11. |
| Daily activity (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC) | Self-reported daily activity rated each evening using the PGIC scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better activity. | Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11. |
| Adverse events | Number and type of adverse events, documented with onset, severity, relatedness to treatment, and resolution. | From day 0 through end of study (day 11). |
| D'Souza RS, Kubrova E, Her YF, Barman RA, Smith BJ, Alvarez GM, West TE, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4440-4473. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02244-9. Epub 2022 Aug 22. |
| 28030470 | Background | Deer TR, Levy RM, Kramer J, Poree L, Amirdelfan K, Grigsby E, Staats P, Burton AW, Burgher AH, Obray J, Scowcroft J, Golovac S, Kapural L, Paicius R, Kim C, Pope J, Yearwood T, Samuel S, McRoberts WP, Cassim H, Netherton M, Miller N, Schaufele M, Tavel E, Davis T, Davis K, Johnson L, Mekhail N. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial. Pain. 2017 Apr;158(4):669-681. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000814. |
| 36942306 | Background | Chapman KB, Sayed D, Lamer T, Hunter C, Weisbein J, Patel KV, Dickerson D, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Amirdelfan K, Deer T, Chakravarthy K. Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 14;16:839-879. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S364370. eCollection 2023. |
| 36705762 | Background | Piedade GS, Gillner S, McPhillips PS, Vesper J, Slotty PJ. Effect of low-frequency dorsal root ganglion stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):947-952. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05500-1. Epub 2023 Jan 27. |
| 42128597 | Derived | Tabatabaei P, Wanman J, Awad A, Eriksson M, Salomonsson J, Bredemo L, Sjoberg R, Hariz MI, Blomstedt P. Subperception dorsal root ganglion stimulation versus sham stimulation in established responders: a randomized, double-blind crossover clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2026 May 13:rapm-2026-107906. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2026-107906. Online ahead of print. |
| D009461 |
| Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001342 | Autonomic Nervous System Diseases |
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |