Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima | OTHER |
| IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo | OTHER |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Villa Sofia | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if a non-invasive procedure called focused ultrasound can safely and effectively treat limb dystonia in adults who have not improved with medications or botulinum toxin injections.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare people who receive focused ultrasound treatment to those who receive a sham procedure (a look-alike procedure without active treatment) to see if the treatment works.
Focused ultrasound works by producing a very small (millimeter-size) lesion in a deep brain region. In this study, the lesion is located in a region called globus pallidus, which helps control movement.
Participants will:
This study may offer a new non-surgical treatment option for people with dystonia affecting the arm or leg, whose pharmacological control is unsatisfactory.
The FUTURE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter national clinical trial aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of unilateral MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) pallidotomy in patients with limb dystonia that is refractory to standard pharmacological treatments.
Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions, causing abnormal movements or postures. In many cases, focal or segmental dystonias affecting the limbs can be managed with oral medications and botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections. However, a subset of patients does not respond adequately to these treatments. For such individuals, surgical intervention may offer relief, yet it remains underutilized due to concerns about invasiveness and complications.
Recent advancements in non-invasive neurosurgical techniques have introduced MRgFUS pallidotomy, a procedure that uses focused ultrasound beams under real-time MRI guidance to precisely ablate small brain targets-in this case, the globus pallidus internus (GPi). The FUTURE study specifically explores this technique as a less invasive alternative to deep brain stimulation, especially for patients with focal or segmental limb dystonia who are ineligible or reluctant to undergo conventional surgery.
The trial will enroll 34 adult patients with idiopathic or genetic limb dystonia that has proven resistant to pharmacologic and BoNT treatment. These patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either:
At three months post-randomization, all patients in the sham group will cross over to receive the active MRgFUS treatment, allowing within-subject comparisons while ensuring ethical access to the therapeutic intervention. The follow-up period for each patient will last six months after active treatment, totaling a maximum of nine months of participation.
The primary endpoint is the change in motor severity as measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) at three months post-treatment. Secondary endpoints include adverse event frequency, patient and clinician global impressions of change, disability assessments (e.g., QuickDASH), quality of life (SF-36), and neurocognitive testing.
Additionally, the study will incorporate neurophysiological (TMS) and neuroimaging (resting-state fMRI) techniques to investigate treatment-induced changes in cortical excitability, plasticity, and functional connectivity, providing insight into the neural mechanisms underlying clinical improvement.
The FUTURE study is coordinated by the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy with participation from other three major Italian neurological institutes. It represents a pioneering effort to evaluate focused ultrasound as a non-invasive therapeutic option for patients with disabling and treatment-resistant forms of limb dystonia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Pallidotomy (MRgFUS) | Experimental | Patients undergo unilateral pallidotomy using Exablate system under MRI guidance. |
|
| Sham Procedure | Sham Comparator | Identical setup without thermal lesioning. Participants cross over to active Pallidotomy after 3 months. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exablate MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Pallidotomy | Device | Active Pallidotomy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Chenge in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) | The BFMDRS has a maximum score of 120 for the movement subscale and 30 for the disability subscale. Higher scores indicating more severe dystonia. | Baseline to Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of treatment-related adverse events | Assessment of any treatment-related adverse events throughout the whole study period | Baseline to Week 24 |
| Changes in the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand (Quick-DASH) score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Eleopra | Contact | +390223942552 | roberto.eleopra@istituto-besta.it | |
| Giovanna Zorzi | Contact | +390223942712 | giovanna.zorzi@istituto-besta.it |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima | Recruiting | Mestre | (Venice) | 30174 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10590980 | Background | Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W. Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:97-103. No abstract available. | |
| 15455393 | Background | Sohn YH, Hallett M. Disturbed surround inhibition in focal hand dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2004 Oct;56(4):595-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.20270. |
Not provided
Not provided
Data will be shared upon reasonable request with appropriate safeguards for privacy and confidentiality
Not provided
Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis
Access to trial individual participant data can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement. For more information or to submit a request, please contact the P.I. of the study
Not provided
Not provided
34 adult patients (17 per arm) will be randomized to receive either active MRgFUS pallidotomy or a sham procedure. Patients in the sham group will cross over to active treatment at 3 months. The follow-up period for all patients will be 6 months post-treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blind (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
| Sham Sham Exablate MRgFUS Pallidotomy | Device | Sham procedure. Identical setup without thermal lesioning. Participants cross over to Active Pallidotomy after 3 months. |
|
The QuickDASH is a shortened, 11-item version of the DASH Outcome Measure, designed to assess physical function and symptom severity related to the arm, shoulder, and hand. Maximum score 100; the greater the score the grear the disability.
| Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24 |
| Changes in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) score | The CGIC is a 7-point scale used to assess the degree of change in a patient's condition since the start of treatment or another defined baseline. Lower scores indicates improvement and higher scores indicating worsening of the patient's condition. | Baseline, week 12 and week 24 |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | The maximum score of the PGIC is 7: the higher the score the higher the improvement reported by a patient. | Baseline, Week 12 and week 24 |
| Change in the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) score | The SF-36 questionnaire has a maximum score of 100 for each of its eight scaled scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health). The higher the scores the more favorable is health state within that specific dimension. | Baseline, week 12 and week 24 |
| Changes in the Short-Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) | This is a neurophysiological measure of inhibitory processes within the motor cortex, assessed using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, which is measured as the relative amplitude reduction of motor evoked potentials from the test stimulus when it is preceded by the conditioning stimulus. The greater the change in SICI, the greater the pallidotomy-induced changes in motor cortex intracortical inhibitory circuits | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Changes in intracortical facilitation (ICF) | This is a neurophysiological measures of cortical excitability, assessed using paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, which describes an increase in the magnitude of a motor evoked potential in a target muscle when a suprathreshold test pulse is preceded by a subthreshold conditioning pulse at specific interstimulus intervals. The greater the change in ICF, the greater the pallidotomy-induced changes in intracortical excitatory circuits | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Changes in Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) | This is a neurophysiological measure of cortical plasticity assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. The greater the change in PAS, the greater the pallidotomy-induced changes in motor cortex synaptic plasticity | Baseline and week 24 |
| Changes in brain activity (using functional connectivity) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) | The investigators will conduct a region-of-interest analysis to calculate changes of fMRI functional connectivity between baseline and post-pallidotomy. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Changes in pallidotomy lesion morphology via contrast MRI | To evaluate the morphological changes of the lesion after 24 hours, 3 months and 6 months from pallidotomy using contrast-enhanced brain MRI and their relationship with clinical changes including adverse events. | 24-hour after the procedure, week 12 and week 24 |
| Changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score | Changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, a 30-point test of global cognitive functions. Score range: 0-30, with lower scores indicating worse cognitive function and higher scores indicating better cognitive function. | Baseline, week 12 and week 24 |
| Change in Digit Span test score | Change in Digit Span test score, a cognitive test assessing memory functions. Score range: 0-[insert maximum score for the test], with lower scores indicating greater memory impairment and higher scores indicating better memory function. | Baseline, week 12 and week 24] |
| Change in the Stroop Test score | Change in Stroop Test scores, a neuropsychological test assessing frontal-lobe executive cognitive function. Score range: [insert minimum]-[insert maximum], with higher scores or slower reaction times indicating worse executive cognitive function. | Baseline, week 12 and week 24 |
| IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" | Recruiting | Messina | 98124 | Italy |
|
| Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta | Recruiting | Milan | 20133 | Italy |
|
| Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia | Recruiting | Palermo | 90146 | Italy |
|
| 3966004 | Background | Burke RE, Fahn S, Marsden CD, Bressman SB, Moskowitz C, Friedman J. Validity and reliability of a rating scale for the primary torsion dystonias. Neurology. 1985 Jan;35(1):73-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.1.73. |
| 34050695 | Background | Horisawa S, Yamaguchi T, Abe K, Hori H, Fukui A, Iijima M, Sumi M, Hodotsuka K, Konishi Y, Kawamata T, Taira T. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Focal Hand Dystonia: A Pilot Study. Mov Disord. 2021 Aug;36(8):1955-1959. doi: 10.1002/mds.28613. Epub 2021 May 29. |
| 35844284 | Background | Stieglitz LH, Mahendran S, Oertel MF, Baumann CR. Bilateral Focused Ultrasound Pallidotomy for Parkinson-Related Facial Dyskinesia-A Case Report. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2022 May 9;9(5):647-651. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13462. eCollection 2022 Jul. |
| 36812432 | Background | Krishna V, Fishman PS, Eisenberg HM, Kaplitt M, Baltuch G, Chang JW, Chang WC, Martinez Fernandez R, Del Alamo M, Halpern CH, Ghanouni P, Eleopra R, Cosgrove R, Guridi J, Gwinn R, Khemani P, Lozano AM, McDannold N, Fasano A, Constantinescu M, Schlesinger I, Dalvi A, Elias WJ. Trial of Globus Pallidus Focused Ultrasound Ablation in Parkinson's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb 23;388(8):683-693. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2202721. |
| 36906335 | Background | Hariz M. Pros and Cons of Ablation for Functional Neurosurgery in the Neurostimulation Age. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2023 Apr;34(2):291-299. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2022.11.006. Epub 2023 Jan 30. |
| 33720521 | Background | Horisawa S, Fukui A, Takeda N, Kawamata T, Taira T. Safety and efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pallidotomy for primary dystonia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Apr;8(4):857-865. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51333. Epub 2021 Mar 15. |
| 33215750 | Background | Centen LM, Oterdoom DLM, Tijssen MAJ, Lesman-Leegte I, van Egmond ME, van Dijk JMC. Bilateral Pallidotomy for Dystonia: A Systematic Review. Mov Disord. 2021 Mar;36(3):547-557. doi: 10.1002/mds.28384. Epub 2020 Nov 20. |
| 23893456 | Background | Jankovic J. Medical treatment of dystonia. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):1001-12. doi: 10.1002/mds.25552. |
| 19103214 | Background | Hallett M, Benecke R, Blitzer A, Comella CL. Treatment of focal dystonias with botulinum neurotoxin. Toxicon. 2009 Oct;54(5):628-33. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.12.008. Epub 2008 Dec 13. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004421 | Dystonia |
| D020821 | Dystonic Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020820 | Dyskinesias |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided