Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) often results in persistent emotional, cognitive, and somatic symptoms-such as headaches and dizziness. These symptoms impose a significant burden, yet their underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
Predictive processing theories suggest that persistent symptoms may result from learned perceptual errors, particularly in individuals with high negative affectivity. This framework may help explain ongoing persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) in the absence of identifiable pathology, which have been linked to various psychological factors.
Mental imagery (MI) is thought to engage similar predictive processes. There is evidence that MI of symptom-triggering movements may exacerbate symptoms in individuals with chronic somatic conditions. However, this phenomenon has not been studied in PPCS patients. Investigating symptom provocation through MI may yield novel insights into the neuropsychological mechanisms sustaining PPCS and potentially contribute to the development of therapeutic tools for this population.
Objectives:
Methods: A cross-sectional study will be conducted on adult patients experiencing PPCS following mTBI. Participants will be recruited through convenience sampling from a computerized hospital database of Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.
After signing an informed consent form, participants will be invited to attend 2 to 3 sessions, each lasting 1 to 2 hours. During these sessions, a licensed physiotherapist will conduct a comprehensive clinical assessment, including: Completion of self-report questionnaires; A vestibular examination; Anamnestic interview and clinical assessment of individual movement- and scenario-related triggers for dizziness and headaches; Symptom provocation testing using mental imagery of the identified triggers.
Study Procedure
Phase 1 - Recruitment A sample will be drawn from the hospital's computerized database based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Phase 2 - Patient Enrollment Potential patients will be contacted by phone and given an extensive overview of the study. They will be invited to participate in the study, and will have to arive to Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital in Tel Aviv in order to sign an informed cosent form in front of a physician that will give them an additional explanation about the study and will answer all their questions and conserns. Current patients of Reut Rehabilitation Hospital will be invited to attend research sessions during their regular treatment days. Patients who have been discharged from the hospital will be invited to participate in research sessions at their convenience, with the option to schedule the first session shortly after signing the informed consent form.
Phase 3 - Medical Record Data Collection Data extraction from patients' medical records, including demographic information, injury date and mechanism, physical and cognitive consequences, additional symptoms, imaging findings, medical history, medication use, previous treatments, and social, psychological, or psychiatric status.
Phase 4 - Clinical Assessments Assessment Session 1
Assessment Session 2
Completion of the vestibular assessment and questionnaires (if not completed in Session 1).
Symptom provocation test using mental imagery in a randomized order:
Assessment Session 3
• Completion of pending assessments.
Phase 5 - Study Completion
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mental Imagery Provocation Testing | Experimental | Provocation Test for Symptoms Using Mental Imagery:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provocation Test for Symptoms Using Mental Imagery | Other | • The mental imagery task will be guided by the examiner through continuous verbal instruction (the examiner will provide ongoing instructions throughout the entire task, not just at the beginning). During the instruction, the examiner will direct the participant's attention to visual, auditory, and proprioceptive aspects of the imagined movement or scenario. Example: "Close your eyes, and without moving your head or body at all, try to imagine that you are moving your head from side to side quickly and easily, while noticing the sensation of motion, seeing the rotation through your eyes, and feeling the acceleration of your head as it moves from side to side..." |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Headache intensity Change | Measured on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale from 0 ("no Pain") to 100 ("most severe Pain") | Immediately before and after the intervention at assessment session 2 |
| Dizziness intensity change | Measured on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale from 0 ("no dizziness") to 100 ("most severe dizziness") | Immediately before and after the intervention at assessment session 2 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Headache Impact on Daily life | Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6): A brief assessment tool used to measure the impact of headaches on daily life. The questionnaire includes six questions addressing the frequency of functional impairment, pain intensity, and quality of life related to headaches | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Withdrawal Criteria:
1. Oculomotor dysfunction affecting multiple oculomotor functions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yotam Yanai, BPT | Contact | 972523993918 | yanayot@gmail.com | |
| Gali Pinsky, BPT | Contact | 972546326566 | galipinsky95@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Keren Sivan-Speier, MD | Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital | Recruiting | Tel Aviv | Israel |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30619066 | Background | Polinder S, Cnossen MC, Real RGL, Covic A, Gorbunova A, Voormolen DC, Master CL, Haagsma JA, Diaz-Arrastia R, von Steinbuechel N. A Multidimensional Approach to Post-concussion Symptoms in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 19;9:1113. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01113. eCollection 2018. | |
| 36708085 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Post-Concussion Symptoms |
Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ): A questionnaire assessing the severity of post-concussion symptoms. It includes 16 items where participants rate their symptoms compared to their pre-injury state on a Likert scale from 0 ("not experienced at all") to 4 ("severe problem"). |
| Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| Perceived disability due to dizziness | Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI): A questionnaire assessing the level of disability caused by dizziness. It consists of 25 items and provides a score in percentages, where 100% indicates a high level of perceived self-disability. | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| Pain Catastrophizing | Pain Catastrophizing Scale - A questionnaire assessing catastrophic thoughts related to pain, consisting of 13 items rated on a scale from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Very much"). A high score indicates a tendency toward catastrophizing-exaggerated negative thoughts, helplessness, and magnification in response to pain. | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| Anxiety | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): A 14-item questionnaire assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) in medical patients. Each subscale consists of 7 items rated on a 0-3 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| Depression | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): A 14-item questionnaire assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) in medical patients. Each subscale consists of 7 items rated on a 0-3 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| Positive and Negative Affect | Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): A questionnaire assessing positive and negative emotions, consisting of 20 items divided into two subscales: positive affect and negative affect. Participants rate the intensity of emotions they experienced over a specified period on a Likert scale from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very much"). | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| PTSD symptom levels | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): A questionnaire assessing PTSD symptoms, including 20 items where participants rate symptom severity on a Likert scale from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| Somatization | Somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): A questionnaire that assesses the presence and severity of somatic symptoms. It includes 12 items related to physical complaints such as pain, gastrointestinal issues, and cardiopulmonary symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0-4 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater levels of somatization. | Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention |
| de Neeling M, Liessens D, Depreitere B. Relationship between psychosocial and psychiatric risk factors and poor long-term outcome following mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2023 May;30(5):1540-1550. doi: 10.1111/ene.15713. Epub 2023 Feb 15. |
| 30876729 | Background | Dijkstra N, Bosch SE, van Gerven MAJ. Shared Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Imagery. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):423-434. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 12. |
| 28108416 | Background | Van den Bergh O, Witthoft M, Petersen S, Brown RJ. Symptoms and the body: Taking the inferential leap. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Mar;74(Pt A):185-203. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 17. |
| 18438892 | Background | Moseley GL, Zalucki N, Birklein F, Marinus J, van Hilten JJ, Luomajoki H. Thinking about movement hurts: the effect of motor imagery on pain and swelling in people with chronic arm pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):623-31. doi: 10.1002/art.23580. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001924 | Brain Concussion |
| D038223 | Post-Concussion Syndrome |
| D051298 | Post-Traumatic Headache |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070642 | Brain Injuries, Traumatic |
| D001930 | Brain Injuries |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D016489 | Head Injuries, Closed |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D014949 | Wounds, Nonpenetrating |
| D051271 | Headache Disorders, Secondary |
| D020773 | Headache Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided