Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the MiA-Study is to address the current lack of effective treatment options to reduce cognitive and physical long-term problems in children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Through the use of the Mio-Training, cognitive development will be strengthened and metacognitive thinking and awareness will increase.
The MiA-Study is conducted additionally to the Mio-study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mio-Training specifically within the ADHD population.
The Mio-Training for children and adolescence with ADHD includes a combination of cognitive and coordinative training tasks and prospective as well as retrospective metacognitive questions. In a randomized controlled trial, the Mio-Training will be analysed for its efficacy on metacognitive thinking and executive functions. In particular, the investigators are interested in factors that affect the efficacy of the training program such as compliance, age, sex or the severity of the ADHD. This study will give insight into the role of metacognition in cognitive performance and will foster the development of children and adolescents with ADHD in the long-term.
In the MiA-Study, the investigators investigate a newly developed Training program at the interface between neuropsychology and sports science - the Mio-Training - for its efficacy. The aim of the Mio-Training is to strengthen the cognitive development of children and adolescents with ADHD in the long-term. The Mio-Training contains a combination of cognitive and coordinative training tasks and metacognitive questions to promote knowledge and awareness of one's own thinking. In order to counteract the shortage of skilled workers and the increasing specialization of individual specialist areas, solutions are needed that can be implemented without a lot of staff. From today's perspective, there are hardly any trainings for children and adolescents that show long-term effects on cognitive development and can also be transferred to non-trained tasks in school and everyday life.
The investigators are testing the effectiveness of the Mio-Training in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and expect a strengthening of metacognition and core cognitive functions (i.e. executive functions). The MiA-Study will provide information about the role of metacognition in cognitive performance and, ideally, provide evidence for a novel, interdisciplinary rehabilitation strategy for children and adolescents with ADHD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training group | Active Comparator | Training with Mio-Training for 5 weeks, three times per week. |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | Waiting control group. Participants may use the Mio-Training after completion of the last follow-up assessment. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mio-Training | Behavioral | The Mio-Training aims to increase metacognitive knowledge, teaches mnemonic skills, trains the working memory capacity and coordinative skills to strenghten cognitive development in children and adolescents with ADHD. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Jr.MAI) | Total score of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory over the three timepoints (baseline, immediate followup & 3-months follow-up). Raw values ranging 18-90. Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children: 5th Ed (WISC-V) | Indices ranging from 0 to 155. Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period. |
| Color-Word Interference Test (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System; D-KEFS) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ-S) | Short version, Likert scale ranging from 1 to 6. Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up. |
| Conners-3 short form |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regula Everts, Prof. Dr. phil. | Contact | +41 31 632 84 97 | regula.everts@insel.ch | |
| Saskia Salzmann, MSc | Contact | +41 31 664 59 84 | saskia.salzmann@insel.ch |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Regula Everts, Prof. Dr. phil. | Division of Neuropaediatrics, Development and Rehabilitation, Department of Paediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insespital, University Hospital Bern | Recruiting | Bern | 3010 | Switzerland |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Webpage MiA-study (german) | View source |
Not provided
Data can be shared upon reasonable request
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001289 | Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019958 | Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Scaled Scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean better outcome. |
| At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period. |
| Tower of Hanoi (D-KEFS) | Scaled Scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period. |
| Verbal learning and memory test (VLMT) | Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period. |
| Pattern learning (Memory and Learning Test; Basic-MLT) | Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period. |
| Test Battery for Attention Assessment (TAP) | T-scores ranging from 20 to 80 (M = 50, SD = 10). Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period. |
| German Motor Performance Test (DMT) | Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period. |
| Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) | T-scores ranging from 20 to 80 (M = 50, SD = 10). Higher scores mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up. |
T-scores ranging from 20 to 80 (M = 50, SD = 10). Higher scores mean better outcome.
| At baseline |
| Questionnaire for the Assessment of Resources and Competencies in Childhood and Adolescence (FRKJ) | Stanine rank from 1-9. Higher score mean better outcome. | At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up. |