The Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation Bioabsorbable Scaffolds Versus Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of De Novo Lesions in Large Coronary Arteries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
The Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation Bioabsorbable Scaffolds Versus Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of De Novo Lesions in Large Coronary Arteries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
This study plans to enroll 150 patients who are candidates for "intervention without implantation" therapy and they will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the new-generation Firesorb scaffold group (BRS group, N=75) or the drug-coated balloon group (DCB group, N=75). All enrolled patients will undergo angiographic follow-up at 1 year post-procedure, and serial follow-up (via telephone or outpatient visit) will be performed at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years post-procedure. The primary study endpoint was percentage diameter stenosis at 1 year post-procedure.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Radiography inclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
1. in-stent lesions; 2. For the left main disease, chronic total occlusive lesions; 3. bifurcation lesion (reference vessel diameter of side branch vessels > 2.0 mm); 4. Severely calcified lesions and tortuous lesions; lesions that have failed pretreatment; lesions unsuitable for balloon delivery and dilatation; 5. Previous use of any brand of drug-coated balloon in the target vessel. General inclusion criteria
mts0207@163.com0516-85786383