Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the ability of G8, CARG, and Frailty scales to predict chemotherapy-related toxicity and the need for G-CSF in elderly cancer patients. It also investigates their correlation with nutritional biomarkers (albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, CRP) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) test.
Background: Aging is associated with decreased physiological reserves, making elderly cancer patients more vulnerable to chemotherapy toxicity (CT). Traditional performance scales like ECOG may be insufficient for treatment decisions. Tools such as G8, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score are practical screening instruments recommended by ASCO and SIOG, yet their combined predictive accuracy for CT and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) usage remains underexplored.
Objectives: This prospective study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of the G8, CARG, and Frailty scales-alone and in combination with nutritional biomarkers (albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, CRP)-in forecasting chemotherapy-related toxicity and G-CSF need. It also investigates the correlation between these geriatric assessment tools and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores.
Methods: The study will be conducted at Çanakkale University Medical Faculty Oncology Outpatient Clinic. Patients aged 65 and above with a planned chemotherapy regimen will be recruited. Before the first chemotherapy cycle, patients will undergo G8, CARG, Frailty, and MNA assessments. Nutritional biomarkers will be extracted from pre-treatment routine lab tests. Chemotherapy toxicity and G-CSF requirement will be monitored across treatment cycles. ROC, correlation, and regression analyses will be conducted to evaluate predictive validity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The study group consists of cancer patients aged 65 and older who are scheduled to receive at least two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with hematological malignancies or receiving concurrent targeted, hormonal, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy are excluded. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Side effects of chemotherapy | From enrollment to 6 month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study group consists of cancer patients aged 65 and older who are scheduled to receive at least two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with hematological malignancies or receiving concurrent targeted, hormonal, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy are excluded.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Univercity | Çanakkale | 17020 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22250183 | Background | Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Mertens C, Delva F, Fonck M, Soubeyran PL. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):2166-2172. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr587. Epub 2012 Jan 16. | |
| 33028215 | Background | Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D000073496 | Frailty |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Background | Kenis, C., Bron, D., Libert, Y., et al., Relevance of a geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer: a systematic review, Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 2014, 5(2): 3-9. |
| 24936581 | Background | Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, Mohile S, Wedding U, Basso U, Colloca G, Rostoft S, Overcash J, Wildiers H, Steer C, Kimmick G, Kanesvaran R, Luciani A, Terret C, Hurria A, Kenis C, Audisio R, Extermann M. Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendationsdagger. Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):288-300. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu210. Epub 2014 Jun 16. |
| Background | Wildiers, H., Heeren, P., Puts, M., et al., Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients with cancer: facts and future, The Lancet Oncology, 2014, 15(5): e184-e192. |
| 21810685 | Background | Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, Owusu C, Klepin HD, Gross CP, Lichtman SM, Gajra A, Bhatia S, Katheria V, Klapper S, Hansen K, Ramani R, Lachs M, Wong FL, Tew WP. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3457-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7625. Epub 2011 Aug 1. |