Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Interlay vs Underlay Graft in Tympanoplasty

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Interlay vs Underlay Graft in Tympanoplasty

Chronic otitis media is a long-term ear infection that may cause a hole in the eardrum, leading to repeated ear discharge and hearing loss. When such perforations do not heal on their own, surgery called tympanoplasty is performed to repair the eardrum and improve hearing.

There are different surgical techniques for tympanoplasty. In the underlay technique, the graft (a small piece of tissue used to repair the hole) is placed beneath the layers of the eardrum. This approach is simpler and commonly used, but it carries risks such as displacement of the graft. In the interlay technique, the graft is positioned between specific layers of the eardrum, which may allow more natural healing and better hearing results, but it is technically more demanding.

This clinical study will compare the postoperative outcomes of these two techniques-interlay and underlay-among adults with large central perforations of the eardrum caused by chronic otitis media. The main outcomes assessed will include hearing improvement (measured by closure of the air-bone gap on hearing tests).

We hypothesize that the placement of the graft significantly influences surgical success and hearing recovery. By comparing interlay versus underlay techniques, the study aims to identify which method provides better results for patients. The findings may help refine surgical approaches and improve the overall quality of life for individuals undergoing tympanoplasty.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients aged l6-60 years, of any gender.
• individuals with chronic otitis media characterized by inactive mucosal disease (absence of discharge) accompanied by a large central perforation persisting for at least 6 weeks and exhibiting pure conductive hearing loss as established through pure-tone audiometry.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Presence of active otitis media manifesting acute infection or discharge.
• Patients diagnosed with tympanosclerosis or ossicular necrosis, adversely affecting ossicular chain mobility, as identified in preoperative assessments.
• History of ear surgeries, excluding myringotomy, that could potentially impact tympanoplasty outcomes, such as ossiculoplasty or mastoidectomy.
• Individuals with sensorineural or mixed hearing loss, as determined by pure-tone audiometry, indicating a possible alternate or additional source of hearing impairment.
• Conditions potentially hindering wound healing or compliance with postoperative care, including but not limited to uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or immunodeficiency disorders.
• Patients exhibiting eustachian tube dysfunction, as confirmed through clinical evaluation or medical records.
• Patients with an active focus of infection in the throat, nose, paranasal sinuses, or oral cavity, as determined by medical records.