Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using a scoring balloon to prepare the femoropopliteal (FP) segment before drug-coated balloon treatment works better than using a regular balloon (called plain old balloon angioplasty, or POBA). This study includes only people with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
A prospective, single-center clinical trial has been designed with two parallel intervention groups of consecutive CLI patients (Rutherford classification 4-5) with lesions in the F-P segment. It is a single-blind study, where the patient is unaware of their group allocation, but the operator knows the group of each patient.
Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either conventional balloon angioplasty or AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon angioplasty prior to drug-coated balloon (Luminor™) treatment.
PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION
Antithrombotic Therapy (Pre-, Intra-, and Post-Procedure):
All patients will be on at least single antiplatelet therapy prior to the procedure, receiving either aspirin (100-300 mg/day) or clopidogrel (75 mg/day).
During the procedure, an intravenous bolus of heparin (1 mg/kg body weight) will be administered.
The postprocedural antithrombotic regimen includes:
Clopidogrel: 75 mg/day starting immediately after the index procedure. Aspirin: 100-300 mg/day starting immediately after the index procedure. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) must be maintained for a minimum of 1 year following the index procedure.
Discontinuation is only permitted if a subsequent procedure requires temporary interruption of one or both antiplatelet agents. In such cases, therapy should be resumed as soon as clinically feasible.
Treatment of Non-Target Lesions:
All significant inflow-limiting lesions (≥50% stenosis) in the study limb must be treated successfully (i.e., ≤30% residual stenosis) prior to initiation of the study index procedure. Treatment should follow the institution's standard of care and reflect current evidence regarding the efficacy of available therapies.
Procedure Sequence of the Target Lesion Treatment:
Pre-dilatation of the lesion Pre-dilatation is mandatory and must be performed using either a standard balloon or an AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon, according to the patient's allocation group.
Dilatation with Luminor™ drug-coated balloon (DCB) Following pre-dilatation, lesion treatment is completed using the Luminor™ balloon catheter.
Definition of Procedural Success.
Treatment of the target lesion is considered successful when the final angiographic result meets both of the following criteria:
If the angiographic result is inconclusive, intraoperative duplex ultrasonography must be performed to evaluate lesion patency and result adequacy.
Bail-Out Stenting Criteria:
In cases where the result after DCB angioplasty is inadequate, bail-out stenting is permitted using the following guidelines:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| POBA | Active Comparator | Vessel preparation using plain old balloon (POBA) prior to using drug coated balloon (Luminor™; Manufacturer: iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) as definitve treatment. |
|
| Scoring balloon | Active Comparator | Vessel preparation using scoring balloon (AngioSculpt™; Manufacturer: Spectranetics Corporation, Fremont, California, USA) prior to using drug coated balloon (Luminor™; Manufacturer: iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) as definitve treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POBA | Device | The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a traditional/regular angioplasty balloon before using the DCB (Luminor™; Manufacturer: iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) as the definitive treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bailout stenting | The need for bailout stenting during the index procedure, defined as implantation due to residual stenosis >30% or flow-limiting dissection (type C according to the Kobayashi classification) | At index procedure |
| Primary patency | Defined by duplex ultrasound as absence of ≥50% restenosis (velocity peak ratio <2.5) and no clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary patency | Defined by duplex ultrasound as absence of ≥50% restenosis (velocity peak ratio <2.5) and no clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) | 1, 6, 18 and 24 months |
| Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Sirvent, PhD | FundaciĂł Privada Hospital Asil de Granollers | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FundaciĂł Privada Hospital Asil de Granollers | Granollers | Barcelona | 08402 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34217209 | Background | Yu X, Zhang X, Lai Z, Shao J, Zeng R, Ye W, Chen Y, Zhang B, Ma B, Cao W, Liu X, Yuan J, Zheng Y, Yang M, Ye Z, Liu B. One-year outcomes of drug-coated balloon treatment for long femoropopliteal lesions: a multicentre cohort and real-world study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02127-x. | |
| 36332764 |
Not provided
Not provided
Data collected within the DASBAD study will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request. Access to the data is controlled to ensure the protection of participant privacy and compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations. Data will be shared upon revision and approval based on scientific merit by the DASBAD management group (which includes a qualified statistician) of a detailed proposal for their use. The data required for the approved, specified purposes and the trial protocol will be provided after the completion of a data-sharing agreement that will be set up by the principal investigator and his team. All data provided will be anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial. Estimated timeframe for response will be within 30 days. Requests for data should be addressed to the corresponding author (M.S.G.; msirvent@fphag.org).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Scoring Balloon | Device | The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a scoring balloon (Angiosculpt™; Manufacturer: Spectranetics Corporation, Fremont, California, USA) before using the DCB (Luminor™; Manufacturer: iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) as the definitive treatment. |
|
|
Defined as any reintervention due to clinical deterioration*, to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5mm proximal and distal to the treated lesion edge respectively. *defined as a worsening of the patient's quality of life, reflected by the EQ5D-questionnaire, worsening of the Rutherford category with minimal 1 class or worsening of wound healing. |
| At 1 month, every 6 months up to 2 years post-procedure |
| Freedom from device and procedure-related death and freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE), including Major Adverse Clinical Events (MACE) and Major Adverse Limb Events(MALE) |
Major Adverse Clinical Events (MACE)
Freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) defined as absence of above-the-ankle target limb amputation or major re-intervention to the target lesion(s) (i.e. new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, thrombectomy/thrombolysis, endovascular reintervention…). | 1- Freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure 2- Freedom from MAE (MACE and MALE) at 1 month, every 6 months up to 2 years post-procedure. |
| Technical success | Technical success is defined as successful use of a device or technique to re-establish vessel patency with a residual stenosis of <30% by visual estimation and residual stenosis less than 50% by duplex imaging | During the procedure |
| Procedural success | Procedural success is defined as technical success and completion of the procedure without complications. This represents successful treatment of the vessels (technical success) in the absence of vessel rupture, distal embolization, thrombosis, access complications, and major adverse cardiovascular events. | Occurring <24 hours and <1 month of the procedure |
| Wound healing time | Wound healing time is defined as the number of days required for the wound to achieve complete healing following the index procedure. | The observation period extends from the date of randomization until the earliest of the following: wound healing, death from any cause, or study completion. |
| Procedural cost | Procedural cost is defined as the total price in euros of all balloons and stents used | Index procedure |
| Shishehbor MH, Scheinert D, Jain A, Brodmann M, Tepe G, Ando K, Krishnan P, Iida O, Laird JR, Schneider PA, Rocha-Singh KJ, Zeller T. Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloons vs Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jan 24;81(3):237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.016. Epub 2022 Nov 1. |
| 31724469 | Background | Karashima E, Yoda S, Yasuda S, Kajiyama S, Ito H, Kaneko T. Usefulness of the "Non-Slip Element" Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Lesions. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Feb;27(1):102-108. doi: 10.1177/1526602819887954. Epub 2019 Nov 14. |
| 32249658 | Background | Horie K, Tanaka A, Taguri M, Inoue N. Impact of Scoring Balloons on Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Outcomes in Femoropopliteal Lesions. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Jun;27(3):481-491. doi: 10.1177/1526602820914618. Epub 2020 Apr 6. |
| 35864209 | Background | Brodmann M, Lansink W, Guetl K, Micari A, Menk J, Zeller T. Long-Term Outcomes of the 150 mm Drug-Coated Balloon Cohort from the IN.PACT Global Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Sep;45(9):1276-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03214-y. Epub 2022 Jul 21. |
| 22192663 | Background | Tosaka A, Soga Y, Iida O, Ishihara T, Hirano K, Suzuki K, Yokoi H, Nanto S, Nobuyoshi M. Classification and clinical impact of restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 3;59(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036. |
| 42242352 | Derived | Sirvent M, Riera C, Gil M, Marti-Mestre X, Artigas V, Bellmunt-Montoya S. Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty after Plain or Scoring Balloon for Vessel Preparation for Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease (DASBAD): A Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2026 Jun 3:S1078-5884(26)00513-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2026.05.034. Online ahead of print. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000089802 | Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia |
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D007511 | Ischemia |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D035061 | Control Groups |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015340 | Epidemiologic Research Design |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D012107 | Research Design |
| D008722 | Methods |
Not provided
Not provided