Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The high incidence of breast cancer is increasing the need for oncologic breast surgery. The optimal acute postoperative pain management after breast surgery is not yet clear. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer and may be potentially safer alternative other regional analgesia techniques. We will investigate the effectiveness of ESP for managing acute pain after breast cancer surgery. Patients will randomise to receive either ESP block (Group1)or no ESP block (Group II). The primary outcome is postoperative pain scores used Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the secondary outcomes include intraoperative opioid consumption postoperative total opioid consumption and patient satisfaction.
Anesthesia induction was achieved with propofol (2-3 mg kg-1), fentanyl (2 mcg kg-1), and rocuronium (0.6 mg kg-1). Anesthesia was maintained with Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) used remifentanil (0.25-0.5 mcg kg-1 min-1) and propofol (150 mcg kg-1 min-1). During maintenance, a fresh gas flow of 3 L with a mixture of 50% oxygen and 50% air was used. The BIS value was kept between 30-50.
Patients were divided into two groups according to a computer-based simple randomization method. Those who received a preoperative ESP block at the T4 vertebra level under ultrasound guidance were designated as Group I, while those who underwent surgery without the block were designated as Group II.
The ESP block was performed unilaterally in the direction of the surgery by the same anesthetist. Blocks were performed using an Esaote ultrasound device (Esaote My Lab 6 US machine, Florence, Italy), a multifrequency convex probe (1-8 MHz), and a 22-gauge, 50 mm facet needle (B. Braun Sonoplex, Melsungen, Germany) The block needle was placed at the level of the T4 spinal process using the in-plane approach, approximately 3 cm lateral to the T4 spinous process in the parasagittal plane. After visualizing the transverse process with the in-plane approach, the 50 mm facet needle (B. Braun Sonoplex, Melsungen, Germany) was inserted through the skin, and a test dose of 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl was injected between the fascia of the trapezius, rhomboid, and erector spinae muscles and the transverse vertebral process to confirm the location. A total of 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine was used as a local anesthetic. The cranial and caudal spread of the local anesthetic was monitored.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Active Comparator | The group with ESP block was defined as Group 1. The ESP block was performed unilaterally in the direction of the surgery. |
|
| Group II | No Intervention | The group without ESP block was defined as Group II. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESP (erector spinae plane)block | Procedure | The ESP block was performed unilaterally in the direction of the surgery by the same anesthetist. Blocks were performed using an Esaote ultrasound device (Esaote My Lab 6 US machine, Florence, Italy), a multifrequency convex probe (1-8 MHz), and a 22-gauge, 50 mm facet needle (B. Braun Sonoplex, Melsungen, Germany). The block needle was placed at the level of the T4 spinal process using the in-plane approach, approximately 3 cm lateral to the T4 spinous process in the parasagittal plane. After visualizing the transverse process with the in-plane approach, the 50 mm facet needle (B. Braun Sonoplex, Melsungen, Germany) was inserted through the skin, and a test dose of 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl was injected between the fascia of the trapezius, rhomboid, and erector spinae muscles and the transverse vertebral process to confirm the location. A total of 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine was used as a local anesthetic. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Remifentanil Consumption | The primary aim of our study was to compare perioperative remifentanil consumption between Group I patients who received a preoperative ESP block and Group II patients who underwent surgery without the block. | From beginning of anesthesia to finished the surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative morphine consumption | After extubation, a patient-controlled analgesia device containing morphine (0.5 mg/ml, 1 mg bolus, 8-minute lockout interval, maximum dose of 6 mg in 1 hour) was installed. The amount of morphine consumed in the postoperative 24 hours was measured. | from the end of the surgery to 24 hours of postoperative |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Since patients were required to undergo breast surgery, only female gender was included in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mukadder Sanli, Associate Professor | Inonu University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| İnonu University Medicine Faculty Turgut ozal Medical Center | Malatya | 44100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28564673 | Background | Wick EC, Grant MC, Wu CL. Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Pain Management With Nonopioid Analgesics and Techniques: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):691-697. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0898. |
Not provided
Not provided
We do not want our data to be used by others.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010268 | Parapsychology |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001525 | Behavioral Sciences |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| The VAS scores | Postoperative pain assessment was conducted using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates unbearable pain) at rest and during movement at the 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes, as well as at 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 24 hours post-surgery. | from the end of the surgery to 24 hours of postoperative |
| patient satisfaction | a four-point patient satisfaction score (1: poor, 2: fair, 3: good, 4: excellent) were evaluated by an anesthetist who was unaware of the study groups. | at the 24th postoperative hour |