Effectiveness of Early Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes in Non-intubated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients: A Quasi-experimental Study
Effectiveness of Early Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes in Non-intubated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients: A Quasi-experimental Study
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early prone positioning in improving clinical outcomes among non-intubated patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Prone positioning, which involves placing patients on their stomachs, has been shown to improve outcomes in patients on mechanical ventilation. However, limited evidence exists for its use in non-intubated patients. The researchers conducted a quasi-experimental study at Jenin Governmental Hospital in Palestine, involving two groups: one received early prone positioning in addition to standard care, and the other received standard care alone. Key clinical outcomes included respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, need for intubation, length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, and mortality. This study adds to the growing evidence supporting non-invasive interventions for managing ARDS and may help inform future clinical guidelines in low-resource settings.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by rapid-onset respiratory failure, low blood oxygen levels (hypoxemia), and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates. While prone positioning has become an established part of care for intubated patients with moderate to severe ARDS, its role in non-intubated, spontaneously breathing patients remains underexplored, particularly in resource-limited settings.
This quasi-experimental study assessed the clinical effectiveness of early implementation of prone positioning in non-intubated ARDS patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Jenin Governmental Hospital, Palestine. The study was conducted from January to April 2024. A total of 100 adult patients who met the Berlin definition of ARDS and did not require immediate intubation were enrolled and divided into two groups of 50: the intervention group received early prone positioning alongside standard medical care, while the control group received only standard care without prone positioning.
The primary clinical endpoints included changes in oxygen saturation (SpO₂), respiratory rate, need for mechanical ventilation, and length of ICU stay. Additional variables such as arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters, hemodynamic stability, and patient tolerance to prone positioning were monitored throughout the ICU admission. Patients were followed until ICU discharge or in-hospital mortality.
The early prone positioning protocol was implemented within 24 hours of ARDS diagnosis. Patients were assisted to maintain the prone position for multiple daily sessions, each lasting 2-4 hours, depending on tolerance and clinical stability. Standardized nursing assessments and physician evaluations were performed to monitor safety and efficacy.
Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods to compare outcomes between groups. Ethical approval was obtained from the Arab American University Institutional Review Board (IRB reference: R-2024/B/84/N). The study provides insight into the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical benefit of prone positioning as a low-cost, non-invasive intervention for managing ARDS in non-intubated patients, with implications for ICU protocols in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: