Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Koc University Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Literature suggests that suction toothbrushes may improve oral care in intubated patients by facilitating secretion removal and reducing microaspiration. This could decrease the need for endotracheal suctioning and lower the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effect of a suction toothbrush on the development of VAP in intubated patients.
in the literature examining the superiority of a suction toothbrush over another regarding the frequency of oral care practices, appropriate solution and material use in intubated patients. It is believed that a suction toothbrush will both facilitate oral care and clear oral secretions. By minimizing secretion accumulation in the mouth, it will prevent microaspiration and reduce the need for endotracheal suctioning in patients. Determining the most effective oral care method is expected to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and positively impact patient mortality. Considering all this information, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of a suction toothbrush on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suction tootbrush + distilled water | Experimental | All tooth surfaces, oral mucosa, and the tongue and surrounding area were cleaned every 8 hours (3x1) with distilled water and a suction toothbrush. The aspiration feature of the suction toothbrush enabled oral care and simultaneous aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions. |
|
| Suction toothbrush + 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral solution | Active Comparator | Every 8 hours (3x1) 15 ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral solution (Adıgüzel, 2015) will be used with a suction toothbrush to clean all tooth surfaces, the oral mucosa, and the tongue. The aspiration feature of the suction toothbrush allows for the aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions during oral care. |
|
| oral care sponge + 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral solution | Active Comparator | All tooth surfaces, oral mucosa, and the tongue and surrounding tongue were cleaned with 15 ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral solution (Adıgüzel, 2015) every 8 hours (3x1) with an oral care sponge used in oral care. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suction tootbrush and distiled water | Other | All tooth surfaces, oral mucosa, and the tongue and surrounding area were cleaned every 8 hours (3x1) with distilled water and a suction toothbrush. The aspiration feature of the suction toothbrush enabled oral care and simultaneous aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The ventilatory associated pneumonia (VAP) | The development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) after entubation in the intensive care unit (Yes / no). If a patient presents signs and symptoms of VAP with both clinical Findings and laboratory findings, researchers will diagnose it as a VAP. | Patients were included 48 hours after admission to the intensive care unit and intubation. After 48 hours of intubation, the development of VAP will be considered as a positive. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Zeliha Genç, PhD | Koc University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koç University hospital Intensive care unit | Istanbul | 34010 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| suction tootbrush and .12% chlorhexidine gluconate | Other | Every 8 hours (3x1) 15 ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral solution (Adıgüzel, 2015) will be used with a suction toothbrush to clean all tooth surfaces, the oral mucosa, and the tongue. The aspiration feature of the suction toothbrush allows for the aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions during oral care. |
|
| Oral care sponge and with 15 ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral solution | Other | All tooth surfaces, oral mucosa, and the tongue and surrounding tongue were cleaned with 15 ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral solution (Adıgüzel, 2015) every 8 hours (3x1) and an oral care sponge used in oral care in the intensive care unit. After oral care, oropharyngeal secretions were aspirated. |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C010882 | chlorhexidine gluconate |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided