Anal Cancer Prevention in High-Risk Categories of Men Who Have Sex With Men - A Danish Prospective Study
Anal Cancer Prevention in High-Risk Categories of Men Who Have Sex With Men - A Danish Prospective Study
The incidence of anal cancer is increasing, particularly among high-risk groups such as men who have sex with men (MSM), especially those living with HIV. The lack of comprehensive screening programs results in delayed diagnosis and higher mortality.
This project aims to establish a screening program for anal cancer in high-risk populations, with a specific focus on those most at risk. Using a prospective study design, the project will assess the effectiveness of early detection and prevention strategies to potentially reduce cancer incidence and improve survival rates. If an HPV-based screening method proves effective, it would serve as a potential implemention for high-risk groups in Denmark, further enhancing early detection and prevention efforts.
This study represents the first large-scale, prospective screening initiative for anal cancer in Denmark,specifically targeting MSM. It introduces a novel approach to cancer prevention in this population by building on research in other cancers and adapting it to anal cancer and its specific risk factors.
The project is a collaboration between clinical practitioners and academic researchers, ensuring that practical clinical insights guide the research and that research findings are rapidly translated into clinical practice. This partnership will enhance both the quality of the research and its direct application in healthcare.
The project is expected to lead to earlier diagnosis of anal cancer, reduced morbidity and mortality among high-risk populations, and the establishment of a screening model that can be applied nationwide. This could significantly reduce the overall healthcare burden associated with late-stage anal cancer and improve patient outcomes across Denmark.
Background:
Anal cancer can potentially be prevented by introducing screening in Denmark. This is in line with the existing cervical cancer screening program available to Danish women aged 23 to 64 since the 1990s.
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is rare in the general population, with an incidence of 1-2 cases per 100,000 (1). In Denmark, approximately 160 new cases of ASCC are diagnosed annually (2), with around 50 fatalities each year. For comparison, there are about 300 cases of cervical cancer in Denmark and 90 related deaths annually. However, the incidence of ASCC has been significantly increasing over the past decades (3) and is expected to rise markedly in the coming years.
More than 80% of the anal cancers are ASCCs. ASCC are preceded by precancerous lesions, anal highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (4). ASCC and anal HSIL are caused by persistent infection with high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV), found in more than 90% of anal HSIL and ASCC cases, with HPV type 16 being the far most carcinogenic type (5, 6).
Certain populations, including people with HIV and men who have sex with men (MSM), have a significantly higher risk of ASCC and its precancerous lesions (7-10). MSM with HIV constitutes the highest risk of anal cancer with an incidence of anal cancer >70/100,000(1) which is more than 50-times the risk of the general population (10). Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is the use of antiviral drugs to protect high-risk populations from acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (11). In Denmark, this treatment is offered to people at increased risk of HIV, with the majority being HIV-negative MSM who are engage in high-risk behaviors, such as having multiple sex partners and unprotected anal intercourse and having had recent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (12).
A recent Danish registry-based study showed a 5-year risk of anal cancer following anal HSIL of 14.1% among people with HIV compared with 3.2% among HIV negative individuals (7). A significant proportion of MSM harbor anal hrHPV. The reported prevalence of anal hrHPV among MSM with HIV and HIV negative MSM on preexposure prophylaxis (MSMonPrEP) is 74-85% (13, 14). The 5-year survival rate after anal cancer is 80% for patients with tumor size < 2 cm and 45-65% with tumor size >2 cm(15). A Danish registry-based study found that only one third of patients diagnosed with ASCC were diagnosed in a local stage, while 6.5% exhibited distant metastasis (16). It is therefore pivotal to prevent the development of ASCC or to diagnose in an early stage.
Therefore, with a targeted effort among high-risk populations in Denmark by examination for precancerous lesions in the anal canal and perianal area most cases of anal cancer could be prevented or detected early, thereby decreasing the risk of cancer spreading and associated mortality. HPV vaccination is expected to be another major long-term solution to ASCC prevention in both men and women(17-19). However, the full impact will not be seen for decades, and many high-risk individuals are already infected with hrHPV, making the vaccine's effectiveness in this group unclear. The ANCOR study (20), a large American multicenter study including more than 4,000 people living with HIV and with histologically confirmed anal HSIL, compared active monitoring with active treatment of anal HSIL using high-resolution anoscopy (HRA). The study found a 57% reduction in risk of progression to ASCC in the treatment arm. The cumulative incidence of progression to anal cancer at 48 months was 0.9% in the treatment group and 1.8% in the active-monitoring group. The risk of progression from anal/perianal HSIL to ASCC increased with size and extent of the lesions. Therefore, missed opportunities likely exist in preventing anal cancer progression from treatable precursor lesions. Consequently, there is an unmet need to clarify whether screening and treatment of anal HSIL in Danish risk-populations is beneficial and to evaluate the necessity of implementing national screening protocols for anal cancer among high-risk populations, especially MSM and people with HIV. Systematic data collection within the Danish population is crucial to identify the high-risk groups that should be offered screening interventions and to test the effectiveness of screening methods before proposing suitable national screening algorithms. With the introduction of a new method in the form of DNA methylation analysis and plasma HPV analysis (pHPV), we hope to predict those individuals who should be offered closer follow-up in the long term, thereby limiting overtreatment/over-testing and all that this entails.
Screening Modalities Since the 1990s, a secondary prevention tool for anal cancer has emerged: high-resolution anoscopy (HRA). This procedure is akin to colposcopy for the cervix, as both HSIL lesions in these areas typically arise in the transformation zone where the columnar and squamous epithelium meets(21, 22).
In November 2023, the International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS) released their consensus guidelines on anal cancer screening for high-risk groups(10). Individuals with a more than 10-fold increased risk of anal cancer are advised to be screened. This aligns with the European guidelines for HIV cancer screening from the European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS)(23). Despite these recommendations, there are currently no Danish guidelines for screening for anal ASCC in high-risk populations.
Screening Tests Anal cytology, HPV testing (genotyping), and hrHPV-cytology co-testing are all currently used strategies for anal cancer screening with acceptable results. hrHPV alone may also be used. Triage using hrHPV testing can reduce the need for referral to HRA. As both sensitivity and specificity of anal cytology is limited, co-testing for anal hrHPV has shown to increase the sensitivity of anal cytology, but the high prevalence of hrHPV in MSM with HIV compromise sensitivity(22). There is a need for prognostic markers to improve screening algorithms for HRA referral. Promising biomarkers, including p16/Ki 67 dual staining, and DNA methylation analysis, are demonstrating potential for future triage testing approaches(5, 24-30). Circulating plasma HPV (pHPV) is being evaluated as a biomarker in a phase III study (NOAC9)(31) for early treatment failure or recurrence in anal cancer patients, showing promising preliminary results. Recent technological advances have enabled the sensitive and reliable identification and quantification of low copy number HPV gene expression in blood. This project will be the first to investigate whether circulating pHPV in participants with biopsy confirmed anal HSIL can serve as a future biomarker in anal cancer screening.
AIM:
The overall aim in a prospective cohort study is:
Additionally, the study aims to:
Materials and Methods:
The study is designed as a prospective observational multicenter study. The investigators aim to include 350 MSM with HIV from the Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, and Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, where they attend regular HIV follow-up (typically one or twice annually), as well as from the Clinic for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, where they undergo STI screening. Additionally, the investigators will include a control group of 350 HIV negative MSMonPrEP from the same departments. Participants will be asked to participate when they are attending for regular outpatient follow-up appointments or STI screening.
Questionnaire All participants will be asked to complete a lifestyle and sexual behavior questionnaire at time of inclusion and after 1-year follow-up visit.
Anal samples for Anal Cytology, Biomarkers, and DNA Methylation Analysis The study includes HPV-based anal cancer screening. Anal samples for HPV will be performed by the two High-resolution anoscopy providers at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Additionally, 80 participants, equivalent to 10-15%, will be asked to perform an anal self-test for HPV analysis at baseline and at 1-year follow-up.
The anal liquid-based cytology is collected using a standard cytobrush, which is inserted into the anal canal rotating while withdrawing. Histologically confirmed HSIL, will have methylation analysis performed. In addition, a blood sample will be collected from participants with biopsy-confirmed anal HSIL to analyze circulating plasma HPV (pHPV blood sample). The blood samples will be analyzed at Department of Pathology, Vejle Hospital. Anal samples for HPV testing, cytology, and p16/Ki67 dual stain cytology analysis will be analyzed at the Department of Pathology, Vejle Hospital and DNA methylation at Randers Hospital.
HPV genotyping will be conducted using the INNO-LiPA test (Fujirebio) to detect DNA from 32 HPV types. This includes 13 high-risk types. Through HPV genotyping, participants will be tested for the persistence of specific genotypes. Anal samples will be tested consecutively, with results communicated to participants.
High-resolution anoscopy All participants will have high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) performed. HRA differs from standard anoscopy by the application of acetic acid 5% and iodine-based Lugol's solution, and visualization under magnification of lesions that would otherwise be invisible. During the procedure the anal canal and the perianal area will be examined for warts and precancerous lesions. The procedure is preceded by a digital anal rectal examination using a water-soluble lubricant mixed with 2-5% lidocaine gel or cream. The anoscope is inserted and a Q-tip wrapped in gauze soaked in 5% acetic acid is inserted and left for 2 minutes, the whole transformation zone is visualized during magnification of a colposcope. The perianal area is likewise visualized after acetic acid application for 2 minutes. Lesions indicative for HSIL or warts will be biopsied and send for histopathological examination at a highly specialized department of Pathology. The biopsies will be taken using biopsy forceps. Digital photos will be taken for documentation during HRA using a digital camara connected to the colposcope.
Participants with biopsy proven anal HSIL by HRA will be offered treatment according to gold standard by either topical (aldara, topical 5-flourouracil or topical cidofovir 2%) or ablative treatment (electrocautery). After treatment the participants will be followed every 6 months with HRA until no signs of anal HSIL and then continue study flow as scheduled.
Statistical analyses:
The prevalence and incidence of anal HPV infection and HSIL will be calculated with descriptive statistics. Prevalence will be calculated overall and separately for low- and high-risk HPV types.
Comparisons between MSM with HIV and MSMonPrEP will be analyzed using chi-squared test and regression models. Associations between outcomes (anal HPV infection, anal HSIL, anal warts) and exposure variables will be evaluated by means of regression models, e.g. Cox regression models or logistic regression models providing hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (Ors), respectively, both with 95% confidence limits. Analyses will be performed overall and separately for the MSM with HIV and MSMonPrEP.
Power calculation and sample size The study is designed to have sufficient statistical power to determine a difference in anal hrHPV, anal warts, and anal HSIL prevalence and incidence in MSM with HIV and MSMonPrEP. The power calculation was performed using a two-sided likelihood ratio test with a significance level of ɑ=0.05. Based on data from the metaanalysis published in Lancet HIV (14), the investigators expect that approximately 74% of the MSM with HIV and 84% of the MSMonPrEP will have incident anal hrHPV infection at the one-year follow-up visit, yielding a power of 88.6%. Additionally, with an expected HSIL prevalence of 22.4% in MSM with HIV and 11.3% in MSMonPrEP (13), and a sample size of 350 in each group, the power to detect the expected difference is 97.6%.
Ethical requirements:
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (2002) after approval by the Regional Scientific Ethical Committee. A RedCap database will be established for the study. All participants will be throughly informed about the purpose and content of the study.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria