Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a microteaching-supported advanced life support simulation on students' teamwork skills and satisfaction.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | No Intervention | The following interventions were applied to the control group;
| |
| Microteaching | Experimental | In the experimental group, unlike the control group, simulation training was supported by microteaching. Microteaching: Students in the experimental group watched the "Advanced Life Support Team Dynamics Video." The video was uploaded to the university's education management system, and a student monitoring report was generated, ensuring that all students could watch it. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microteaching | Other | Students in the experimental group watched the "Advanced Life Support Team Dynamics Video." The video was uploaded to the university's education management system, and a student monitoring report was generated, ensuring that all students could watch it. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Teamwork level measured by Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale after simulation training | Teamwork was assessed using the Turkish version of the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHP-TS). The scale evaluates 16 aspects of team functioning, with each item rated on a 3-point scale: 0 (never), 1 (inconsistent), and 2 (consistent). Total scores range from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating better teamwork. The scale was administered immediately after the simulation-based advanced life support training supported by microteaching. | Immediately after the completion of the simulation training session. |
| Student satisfaction and self-confidence levels measured by the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale after simulation training | Student satisfaction and self-confidence were assessed using the Turkish version of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SSSCLS). The scale includes two subscales: Satisfaction (5 items) and Self-confidence (8 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and confidence. The scale was administered immediately after the simulation-based advanced life support training supported by microteaching. | Immediately after the simulation training session |
Not provided
Not provided
Being a senior nursing student and willing to participate in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acibadem Universty | Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28084900 | Background | Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, Gaioso V, Moss J, Tastan S, Iyigun E, Tosun N. The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire. Contemp Nurse. 2017 Feb;53(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1282319. Epub 2017 Feb 10. | |
| 19088602 |
Not provided
Not provided
Because I did not receive consent from the participants on this matter.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | May 4, 2025 | Jul 31, 2025 | Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Malec JF, Torsher LC, Dunn WF, Wiegmann DA, Arnold JJ, Brown DA, Phatak V. The mayo high performance teamwork scale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills. Simul Healthc. 2007 Spring;2(1):4-10. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31802b68ee. |
| Background | INACSL Standards Committee, Bowler, F., Klein, M. & Wilford, A. (2021, September). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM Professional Integrity. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.014. |