Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Since 2014, suicide prevention has been a national priority and is one of the 3 priority areas of the mental health plan's roadmap .
Hospitalization offers a crucial opportunity for life-preserving intervention . Brief health interventions and contacts are reputed to be easy to implement, effective and inexpensive .
The Hope Box is a practical emotional management tool that aims to encourage the expression of reasons for living by materializing them in a customizable box, filled with objects, photos, writings and memories in order to find comfort and hope .
Peer support use their experiential knowledge of disorders and recovery to accompany people and help humanize care . They can play a decisive role in suicide prevention .
In contrast to an approach focusing only on risk factors, peer support and the Hope Box are both focus on protective factors, the strengths of the people concerned and hope.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the HOPAIR intervention (peer-support and Hope Box, completed by a reminder postcard) with suicidal people hospitalized in psychiatric crisis units. Its secondary objective is to assess the potential effectiveness on intensity of hopelessness, sense of self-efficacy, reasons for living, perceived social support and suicidal recurrence at 3 months.
This is a mixed-methods study involving 40 patients and 2 peer support in two crisis hospitalization units.
Around 703,000 people die by suicide each year worldwide, with suicide prevention being a national priority in France since 2014. The period after a patient is discharged from the hospital is a particularly high-risk time for suicide, especially for those with a history of suicide attempts.
This study proposes a new intervention called HOPAIR, which combines three key components:
The primary objective of the HOPAIR study is to evaluate the feasibility of this combined intervention for suicidal patients hospitalized in a psychiatric crisis unit. The study also aims to assess the potential effectiveness of HOPAIR on several factors after three months, including:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOPAIR Intervention: Meeting between Peer helper and Concerned Individual in Psychiatric Crisis Unit | Other | This intervention begins with an initial discussion focused on the individual's lived experience, followed by an explanation of the Hope Box's principle, utility, and use. After each intervention, the peer supporter will complete a satisfaction self-questionnaire to provide feedback. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOPAIR Intervention: Meeting between Peer Helper and Concerned Individual in Psychiatric Crisis Unit | Other | This intervention begins with an initial discussion focused on the individual's lived experience, followed by an explanation of the Hope Box's principle, utility, and use. After each intervention, the peer supporter will complete a satisfaction self-questionnaire to provide feedback. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility Evaluation of the Combined HOPAIR Intervention (Peer Support, Hope Box, and Postcard Reminder) for Suicidal Inpatients in Psychiatric Crisis Units at 3-Month Post-Intervention. | It will be assessed by :
| 37 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of the HOPAIR intervention on indicators of well-being at 3 months post-intervention. | The potential effectiveness of the HOPAIR system will be assessed by comparing the differences in scores and responses to questions at inclusion, during a face-to-face interview and at 3 months after the HOPAIR intervention during a telephone interview by the IPA using the following scales and questions. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara VERNET, IPA | Contact | 00334 37 91 52 10 | Tamara.vernet@ch-le-vinatier.fr | |
| Veronique VIAL | Contact | 00334 37 91 55 22 | veronique.vial@ch-le-vinatier.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tamara VERNET, IPA | Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier | Recruiting | Bron | AURA | 69678 CEDEX | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000092864 | Suicide Prevention |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013405 | Suicide |
| D016728 | Self-Injurious Behavior |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Mixed bi-centric
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 37 months |
| Effectiveness of the HOPAIR intervention on indicators of suicidality at 3 months post-intervention. | The potential effectiveness of the HOPAIR system will be assessed by comparing the differences in scores and responses to questions at inclusion, during a face-to-face interview and at 3 months after the HOPAIR intervention during a telephone interview by the IPA using the following scales and questions | 37 months |